Targeting Pancreatic Cancer Cells and Stellate Cells Using Designer Nanotherapeutics in vitro

Introduction and Objective Pancreatic cancer (PC) is characterized by a robust desmoplastic environment, which limits the uptake of the standard first-line chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine. Enhancing gemcitabine delivery to the complex tumor microenvironment (TME) is a major clinical challenge. Molecular crosstalk between pancreatic cancer cells (PCCs) and pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) plays a critical role in desmoplastic reaction in PCs. Herein, we report the development of a targeted drug delivery system to inhibit the proliferation of PCCs and PSCs in vitro. Using gold nanoparticles as the delivery vehicle, the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (C225/C) as a targeting agent, gemcitabine as drug and polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a stealth molecule, we created a series of targeted drug delivery systems. Methods Fabricated nanoconjugates were characterized by various physicochemical techniques such as UV-Visible spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, HPLC and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). Results and Conclusion Targeted gemcitabine delivery systems containing mPEG-SH having molecular weights of 550 Da or 1000 Da demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing the viability of both PCCs and PSCs as compared to their non-targeted counterparts. EGFR-targeted pathway was further validated by pre-treating cells with C225 followed by determining cellular viability. Taken together, in our current study we have developed a PEGylated targeted nanoconjugate ACG44P1000 that showed enhanced selectivity towards pancreatic cancer cells and pancreatic stellate cells, among others, for gemcitabine delivery. We will investigate the ability of these optimized conjugates to inhibit desmoplasia and tumor growth in vivo in our future studies.

[1]  Resham Bhattacharya,et al.  Gold nanoparticle transforms activated cancer-associated fibroblasts to quiescence. , 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[2]  H. Kocher,et al.  Pancreatic Cancer , 2019, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[3]  R. Turkington,et al.  Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes , 2018, World journal of gastroenterology.

[4]  Lucía Gutiérrez,et al.  Effect of Surface Chemistry and Associated Protein Corona on the Long-Term Biodegradation of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles In Vivo. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[5]  Kai Shi,et al.  Cleavable PEGylation: a strategy for overcoming the “PEG dilemma” in efficient drug delivery , 2017, Drug delivery.

[6]  S. Gill,et al.  Eligibility of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients for First-Line Palliative Intent nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Versus FOLFIRINOX , 2017, American journal of clinical oncology.

[7]  J. Hubbuch,et al.  Effect of PEG molecular weight and PEGylation degree on the physical stability of PEGylated lysozyme. , 2017, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[8]  Rachel A. Kudgus,et al.  Gold Nanoparticle Reprograms Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment and Inhibits Tumor Growth. , 2016, ACS nano.

[9]  C. Xie,et al.  An in vitro and in vivo study of gemcitabine-loaded albumin nanoparticles in a pancreatic cancer cell line , 2015, International journal of nanomedicine.

[10]  M. Swierczewska,et al.  What is the future of PEGylated therapies? , 2015, Expert opinion on emerging drugs.

[11]  Caroline H. Diep,et al.  Desmoplasia in Primary Tumors and Metastatic Lesions of Pancreatic Cancer , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  P. Ross,et al.  FOLFIRINOX – a new paradigm in the treatment of pancreatic cancer , 2014, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[13]  Rachel A. Kudgus,et al.  Tuning Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of a Targeted Drug Delivery System Through Incorporation of a Passive Targeting Component , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[14]  S. Lai,et al.  Evading immune cell uptake and clearance requires PEG grafting at densities substantially exceeding the minimum for brush conformation. , 2014, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[15]  H. Harashima,et al.  The polyethyleneglycol dilemma: advantage and disadvantage of PEGylation of liposomes for systemic genes and nucleic acids delivery to tumors. , 2013, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[16]  Rachel A. Kudgus,et al.  Inhibiting the Growth of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma In Vitro and In Vivo through Targeted Treatment with Designer Gold Nanotherapeutics , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  J. Benoit,et al.  Gemcitabine versus Modified Gemcitabine: a review of several promising chemical modifications. , 2013, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[18]  Seung‐Mo Hong,et al.  Unlike Pancreatic Cancer Cells Pancreatic Cancer Associated Fibroblasts Display Minimal Gene Induction after 5-Aza-2′-Deoxycytidine , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  K. Joshi,et al.  Molecular evidence for increased antitumor activity of gemcitabine in combination with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, P276-00 in pancreatic cancers , 2012, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[20]  Sheng Cao,et al.  Designing Nanoconjugates to Effectively Target Pancreatic Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  Justin Hanes,et al.  Biodegradable nanoparticles composed entirely of safe materials that rapidly penetrate human mucus. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  Manuela Semmler-Behnke,et al.  Biodistribution of PEG-modified gold nanoparticles following intratracheal instillation and intravenous injection. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[23]  Seung‐Mo Hong,et al.  Overexpression of Smoothened Activates the Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Pancreatic Cancer–Associated Fibroblasts , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  N. Steinmetz,et al.  PEGylated viral nanoparticles for biomedicine: the impact of PEG chain length on VNP cell interactions in vitro and ex vivo. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.

[25]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Micro- and macrorheology of mucus. , 2009, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[26]  J. S. Suk,et al.  Addressing the PEG mucoadhesivity paradox to engineer nanoparticles that "slip" through the human mucus barrier. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[27]  Leaf Huang,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of nanoparticles. , 2008, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[28]  Seung‐Mo Hong,et al.  Pancreatic cancer associated fibroblasts display normal allelotypes , 2008, Cancer biology & therapy.

[29]  D. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Targeted delivery of gemcitabine to pancreatic adenocarcinoma using cetuximab as a targeting agent. , 2008, Cancer research.

[30]  Michael J Yaszemski,et al.  Potential therapeutic application of gold nanoparticles in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (BCLL): enhancing apoptosis , 2007, Journal of nanobiotechnology.

[31]  Justin Hanes,et al.  Rapid transport of large polymeric nanoparticles in fresh undiluted human mucus , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  S. Stainmesse,et al.  Freeze-drying of nanoparticles: formulation, process and storage considerations. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[33]  Nicholas A Peppas,et al.  Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. , 2006, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[34]  H. Lane,et al.  ERBB Receptors and Cancer: The Complexity of Targeted Inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  Siu-Fun Wong,et al.  Cetuximab: an epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody for the treatment of colorectal cancer. , 2005, Clinical therapeutics.

[36]  M. R. Aberturas,et al.  Stability and freeze-drying of cyclosporine loaded poly(D,L lactide-glycolide) carriers. , 1999, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[37]  F Franks,et al.  Freeze-drying of bioproducts: putting principles into practice. , 1998, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[38]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  N. Peppas,et al.  Enhanced hydrogel adhesion by polymer interdiffusion: use of linear poly(ethylene glycol) as an adhesion promoter. , 1997, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[40]  V. Heinemann,et al.  Gemcitabine: metabolism, mechanisms of action, and self-potentiation. , 1995, Seminars in oncology.

[41]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[42]  H. Maeda,et al.  A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. , 1986, Cancer research.