Use of Inverse Spatial Conservation Prioritization to Avoid Biological Diversity Loss Outside Protected Areas

Globally expanding human land use sets constantly increasing pressure for maintenance of biological diversity and functioning ecosystems. To fight the decline of biological diversity, conservation science has broken ground with methods such as the operational model of systematic conservation planning (SCP), which focuses on design and on-the-ground implementation of conservation areas. The most commonly used method in SCP is reserve selection that focuses on the spatial design of reserve networks and their expansion. We expanded these methods by introducing another form of spatial allocation of conservation effort relevant for land-use zoning at the landscape scale that avoids negative ecological effects of human land use outside protected areas. We call our method inverse spatial conservation prioritization. It can be used to identify areas suitable for economic development while simultaneously limiting total ecological and environmental effects of that development at the landscape level by identifying areas with highest economic but lowest ecological value. Our method is not based on a priori targets, and as such it is applicable to cases where the effects of land use on, for example, individual species or ecosystem types are relatively small and would not lead to violation of regional or national conservation targets. We applied our method to land-use allocation to peat mining. Our method identified a combination of profitable production areas that provides the needed area for peat production while retaining most of the landscape-level ecological value of the ecosystem. The results of this inverse spatial conservation prioritization are being used in land-use zoning in the province of Central Finland.

[1]  Piero Visconti,et al.  Future hotspots of terrestrial mammal loss , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Spatial marine zoning for fisheries and conservation , 2010 .

[3]  K. Gaston,et al.  Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns , 2008 .

[5]  P. Kareiva,et al.  How Much Is Enough? The Recurrent Problem of Setting Measurable Objectives in Conservation , 2005 .

[6]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Value of Biodiversity in Reserve Selection: Representation, Species Weighting, and Benefit Functions , 2005 .

[7]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Use of many low-level conservation targets reduces high-level conservation performance , 2012 .

[8]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts , 2006, Nature.

[9]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Setting conservation targets under budgetary constraints , 2011 .

[10]  Robert L Pressey,et al.  Opportunism, Threats, and the Evolution of Systematic Conservation Planning , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  Beyond Reserves: A Research Agenda for Conserving Biodiversity in Human‐modified Tropical Landscapes , 2009 .

[13]  G. Wilhere The How‐Much‐Is‐Enough Myth , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Zonation: Spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.0 user manual , 2011 .

[15]  Rebecca Weeks,et al.  Incorporating local tenure in the systematic design of marine protected area networks , 2010 .

[16]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Site‐Selection Algorithms and Habitat Loss , 2003 .

[17]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Persistence and vulnerability: Retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas , 2002, Journal of Biosciences.

[18]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[19]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Fine-scale conservation planning outside of reserves: Cost-effective selection of retention patches at final harvest , 2011 .

[20]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Empirical evidence for reduced protection levels across biodiversity features from target-based conservation planning , 2012 .

[21]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  Global patterns of fragmentation and connectivity of mammalian carnivore habitat , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Replacement cost: A practical measure of site value for cost-effective reserve planning , 2006 .

[23]  Carlo Rondinini,et al.  Quantitative methods for defining percentage area targets for habitat types in conservation planning , 2010 .

[24]  Karin Frank,et al.  A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[25]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Aligning Conservation Priorities Across Taxa in Madagascar with High-Resolution Planning Tools , 2008, Science.

[26]  C. Tovar,et al.  Determining the ecological value of landscapes beyond protected areas , 2012 .

[27]  C. Revelle,et al.  Counterpart Models in Facility Location Science and Reserve Selection Science , 2002 .

[28]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Biodiversity conservation planning tools , 2006 .

[29]  Janne S. Kotiaho,et al.  Woodland key habitats evaluated as part of a functional reserve network , 2010 .

[30]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[31]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[32]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Size-dependent resistance of protected areas to land-use change , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Kristine N. Stewart,et al.  Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas , 2012, Nature.

[34]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Conserving biodiversity in production landscapes. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  H. Possingham,et al.  Hitting the target and missing the point: target‐based conservation planning in context , 2009 .

[36]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  N. Ban,et al.  Beyond Marine Reserves: Exploring the Approach of Selecting Areas where Fishing Is Permitted, Rather than Prohibited , 2009, PloS one.

[38]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in urban landscapes , 2009 .

[39]  P. Mathur,et al.  Looking Beyond Protected Area Networks: A Paradigm Shift in Approach for Biodiversity Conservation , 2008 .

[40]  R. Cuperus,et al.  Ecological Compensation in Dutch Highway Planning , 2001, Environmental management.

[41]  Aldina M. A. Franco,et al.  Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[43]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A comparison of zoning analyses to inform the planning of a marine protected area network in Raja Ampat, Indonesia , 2013 .

[44]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Small patches can be valuable for biodiversity conservation: two case studies on birds in southeastern Australia , 2002 .

[45]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[47]  Alan Wade,et al.  Mind the sustainability gap. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[49]  S. Polasky,et al.  CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES , 2005 .

[50]  Leona K. Svancara,et al.  Policy-driven versus Evidence-based Conservation: A Review of Political Targets and Biological Needs , 2005 .

[51]  H. Kujala,et al.  Costs of Integrating Economics and Conservation Planning , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  Magnus Nyström,et al.  Reserves, Resilience and Dynamic Landscapes , 2003, Ambio.

[53]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies , 2007 .

[54]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Protected areas: Goals, limitations, and design , 2006 .