Bare phrase structure, label-less trees, and specifier-less syntax. Is Minimalism becoming a dependency grammar?

Abstract Due to the programmatic nature of Minimalism, there are many directions that variations of this formalism can take. This paper demonstrates that one trend in Minimalism is steering toward Dependency Grammar (DG): bare phrase structure, label-less trees, and specifier-less syntax are all aspects/developments of/within Minimalism that are steering toward a dependency-based (as opposed to a constituency based) understanding of syntax and grammar. With this trend in mind, a version of Merge is introduced that completes the development. This version generates dependency-based structures in a strictly left-to-right manner, i.e., in the manner that all natural language is spoken and processed. The particular innovation that makes this concept of Merge possible is the catena. The catena is a novel unit of syntactic analysis that is unique to dependency-based structures. A number of empirical considerations support catena-based left-to-right Merge, e.g., garden path sentences, restrictions on center embeddings, aspects of coordinate structures, subject-auxiliary inversion, the distribution of pronouns, etc.

[1]  Klaus Schubert Metataxis: Contrastive Dependency Syntax for Machine Translation , 1987 .

[2]  Donna Jo Napoli Syntax: Theory and Problems , 1993 .

[3]  Jan-Wouter Zwart,et al.  Prospects for top-down derivation , 2009 .

[4]  M. Pickering,et al.  Dependency categorial grammar and coordination , 1993 .

[5]  Lucien Tesnière Éléments de syntaxe structurale , 1959 .

[6]  Jamal Ouhalla Introducing Transformational Grammar: From Rules to Principles and Parameters , 1994 .

[7]  M. Brody,et al.  Mirror Theory: Syntactic Representation in Perfect Syntax , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[8]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Transformational Grammar: A First Course , 1988 .

[9]  Igor Mel’čuk,et al.  Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice , 1987 .

[10]  Robert A. Chametzky,et al.  Phrase Structure: From Gb to Minimalism , 2000 .

[11]  Sam Gutmann,et al.  Crash‐Proof Syntax , 2008 .

[12]  Richard Hudson,et al.  English word grammar , 1995 .

[13]  James D. McCawley,et al.  The syntactic phenomena of English , 1988 .

[14]  Michael T. Putnam,et al.  Traveling without moving: The conceptual necessity of Survive-minimalism , 2009 .

[15]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  English Grammar: A Generative Perspective , 1998 .

[16]  Naoki Fukui Theory of Projection in Syntax , 1995 .

[17]  Richard Hudson,et al.  The difficulty of (so-called) self-embedded structures * , 1996 .

[18]  Michael T. Putnam,et al.  Catenae: Introducing a Novel Unit of Syntactic Analysis , 2012 .

[19]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Aspects of the Theory of Syntax , 1970 .

[20]  Hans Jürgen Heringer Deutsche syntax dependentiell , 1996 .

[21]  Noam Chomsky Three Factors in Language Design , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[22]  Elizabeth Cowper,et al.  A concise introduction to syntactic theory : the government-binding approach , 1992 .

[23]  T. Stroik The numeration in Survive-minimalism , 2009 .

[24]  Andrew Radford,et al.  English Syntax: An Introduction , 2004 .

[25]  Hirofumi Mikame Hans-Werner Eroms: Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 2000 , 2002 .

[26]  Beatrice Kroch Anthony Santorini,et al.  The syntax of natural language: An online introduction using the Trees program , 2007 .

[27]  Noam Chomsky Approaching UG from Below , 2006 .

[28]  Jan-Wouter Zwart,et al.  On the format of dependency relations , 2003 .

[29]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[30]  Jim Miller,et al.  Syntax: A Linguistic Introduction to Sentence Structure , 2020 .

[31]  Željko Bošković,et al.  A–movement and the EPP , 2002 .

[32]  C. Phillips Linear Order and Constituency , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[33]  J. V. Dam Syntax der Deutschen Sprache , 1972 .

[34]  William O'grady,et al.  The Syntax of Idioms , 1998 .

[35]  Adrian Akmajian,et al.  Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication , 1979 .

[36]  Cedric Boeckx A tale of two minimalisms: Reflections on the plausibility of crash-proof syntax, and its free-merge alternative , 2010 .

[37]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[38]  K. A. Jayaseelan Bare Phrase Structure and Specifier-less Syntax , 2008, Biolinguistics.

[39]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[40]  Thomas S. Stroik,et al.  Locality in Minimalist Syntax , 2009 .

[41]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[42]  M. Brody,et al.  Projection and Phrase Structure , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[43]  Wha-Young Jung Syntaktische Relationen im Rahmen der Dependenzgrammatik , 1995 .

[44]  Sam Gutmann,et al.  Cyclic Computation, A Computationally Efficient Minimalist Syntax , 1999 .

[45]  J. Zwart Structure and order: asymmetric merge , 2011 .

[46]  Günther Grewendorf,et al.  Phases and cycles. Some problems with Phase Theory , 2009 .

[47]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Principles of diachronic syntax , 1979 .

[48]  András Kornai,et al.  The X-bar theory of phrase structure , 1990 .

[49]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach , 1997 .

[50]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Thinking Syntactically: A Guide to Argumentation and Analysis , 2005 .

[51]  Jane J. Robinson Dependency Structures and Transformational Rules , 1970 .

[52]  J. Hawkins A parsing theory of word order universals , 1990 .

[53]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory , 2000 .

[54]  Rui P. Chaves Crash-free syntax and crash phenomena in model-theoretic grammar , 2010 .

[55]  Timothy Osborne,et al.  The Weight of Predicates: A Dependency Grammar Analysis of Predicate Weight in German , 2007, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.

[56]  Michael T. Putnam,et al.  Syntactic relations in Survive-minimalism , 2010 .

[57]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Remarks on Nominalization , 2020, Nominalization.

[58]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[59]  D. G. Hays Dependency Theory: A Formalism and Some Observations , 1964 .

[60]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[61]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program , 2002 .

[62]  Timothy Osborne Beyond the Constituent - A Dependency Grammar Analysis of Chains , 2006 .

[63]  Robert A. Chametzky Dominance, precedence, and parameterization , 1995 .

[64]  Cedric Boeckx Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-Distance Dependencies , 2006 .

[65]  Timothy Osborne,et al.  Shared Material and Grammar: Toward A Dependency Grammar Theory of Non-Gapping Coordination for English and German , 2006 .

[66]  Timothy Osborne,et al.  Major constituents and two dependency grammar constraints on sharing in coordination , 2008 .

[67]  Dennis Ott Grammaticality, interfaces, and UG , 2010 .

[68]  R. Borsley Syntactic Theory: A Unified Approach , 1991 .

[69]  Thomas M. Gross Theoretical foundations of dependency syntax , 1999 .

[70]  D. J. Allerton,et al.  Essentials of grammatical theory: A consensus view of syntax and morphology , 1979 .

[71]  Stanley Starosta The case for lexicase : an outline of lexicase grammatical theory , 1989 .