Prognosis in children with rhabdomyosarcoma: a report of the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma studies I and II. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Committee.

Prestudy patient characteristics and specific therapy of all eligible patients with rhabdomyosarcoma entered into Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) Studies I (IRS-I) (1972 to 1978, n = 686) or II (IRS-II) (1978 to 1984, n = 1,002) were examined for their relationship to survival within each of the four clinical groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. The estimated survival at 5 years from the start of treatment was 56% in IRS-I and 62% in IRS-II (P = .006). The largest survival difference between studies was in patients with group III tumors (52% v 65%). The clinical group was the most important patient characteristic related to survival in both studies. Survival progressively decreased for patients from clinical group I (localized disease, completely resected) to group IV (metastatic disease at the onset). In clinical group I, the only patient characteristic consistently related to survival was histology. Patients with alveolar tumors had the poorest survival, while those with botryoid/embryonal lesions had the best survival. In clinical group II, no characteristic was consistently related to survival. In clinical group III, an orbital primary site was associated with a favorable survival. In clinical group IV, patients with genitourinary tumors had a significant survival advantage. Use of disease-free survival as an end point gave very similar results. This information, from the largest available data base on prognostic indicators in childhood RMS in the context of aggressive multimodal therapies, is being used to plan therapy in the forthcoming study (IRS-IV).

[1]  P. Voûte,et al.  Prognostic factors in 281 children with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) at diagnosis. , 1988, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[2]  E. Gehan,et al.  Paratesticular sarcoma in childhood and adolescence: A report from the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma studies I and II, 1973–1983 , 1987, Cancer.

[3]  M. Beltangady,et al.  Localized orbital rhabdomyosarcoma. An interim report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Committee. , 1987, Ophthalmology.

[4]  E. Gehan,et al.  Prognostic significance of staging factors of the UICC staging system in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS-II). , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  H. Sather,et al.  Statistical evaluation of prognostic factors in ALL and treatment results. , 1986, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[6]  A. Look,et al.  Cellular DNA content as a predictor of response to chemotherapy in infants with unresectable neuroblastoma. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Foulkes,et al.  Prognosis of children with soft tissue sarcoma who relapse after achieving a complete response. A report from the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study I , 2006, Cancer.

[8]  E. Gehan,et al.  Bladder and prostatic tumors in the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study (IRS‐I). Results of therapy , 1982, Cancer.

[9]  E. Gehan,et al.  Prognostic factors in children with rhabdomyosarcoma. , 1981, National Cancer Institute monograph.

[10]  T R Holford,et al.  A stepwise variable selection procedure for nonlinear regression models. , 1980, Biometrics.

[11]  J. Berg,et al.  Prognostic variables in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma before and after multi-modal therapy. , 1979, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[12]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[13]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .