Isolating global and specific factors in developmental dyslexia: a study based on the rate and amount model (RAM)

Using the reading-age match approach, research on developmental dyslexia focuses on specific (e.g., phonological) deficits and disregards the possible role of global influences in determining the disturbance. In the present study, we set out to investigate the role of both global and specific factors in Italian developmental dyslexics using the rate-amount model (RAM; Faust et al. in Psychol Bull 125:777–799, 1999). Vocal reaction times (RT) in naming pictures, words and non-words of varying length were measured in a group of 26 sixth- to eighth-grade dyslexics and 81 age-matched control readers. Dyslexics’ raw RTs showed greater lexicality (longer RTs to non-words than words) and length (longer RTs to long stimuli than short ones) effects than controls’. We found that one global factor predicted most individual variation in naming words and non-words, but not pictures. When data transformations, effective in controlling for the global factor, were applied to the data, the greater lexicality effect in dyslexics vanished, due to the influence of the global factor and not a specific failure in the non-lexical reading procedure. Conversely, the greater length effect in dyslexics persisted. Overall, dyslexics’ reading performance was best explained as due to the influence of both a global factor for processing orthographic material prelexically and to the specific influence of stimulus length. This conceptualisation appears more promising for bridging the gap between behavioural and functional imaging studies than traditional approaches, which focus on the detection of specific reading deficits. It is concluded that RAM is a useful tool for disentangling the components that are impaired in reading and for defining the characteristics of the global factor, because the paradigm is more powerful for studying developmental dyslexia than the reading-age match method.

[1]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  Interpreting Reaction Time Measures in Between-Group Comparisons , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[2]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Routes To Reading Success and Failure: Toward an Integrated Cognitive Psychology of Atypical Reading , 2001 .

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[5]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Regularity Effects and the Phonological Deficit Model of Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analytic Review. , 1998 .

[6]  Conrad Perry,et al.  Developmental dyslexia in different languages: language-specific or universal? , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Evidence for a dysfunction of left posterior reading areas in German dyslexic readers , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[9]  R. Kail,et al.  Processing speed, naming speed, and reading. , 1994 .

[10]  Peter Bryant,et al.  The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics , 1986, Cognition.

[11]  P. Zoccolotti,et al.  Do Phonologic and Rapid Automatized Naming Deficits Differentially Affect Dyslexic Children With and Without a History of Language Delay? A Study of Italian Dyslexic Children , 2006, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[12]  M. Snowling,et al.  The Nonword Reading Deficit in Developmental Dyslexia: A Review. , 1992 .

[13]  Adriana G. Bus,et al.  Meta-analytic confirmation of the nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia , 1994 .

[14]  D. Bishop,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychology and Developmental Disorders: Uncomfortable Bedfellows , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system , 1993, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[16]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Varieties of developmental dyslexia , 1993, Cognition.

[17]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Functional specificity of the visual word form area: General activation for words and symbols but specific network activation for words , 2008, Brain and Language.

[18]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Word reading and picture naming in Italian , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[19]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. , 1994 .

[20]  Notes and discussion Word length eVect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia , 2005 .

[21]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Lexicality and Stimulus Length Effects in Italian Dyslexics: Role of the Overadditivity Effect , 2006, Child Neuropsychology: A Journal of Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence.

[22]  C. Pruneti Dati normativi del test P.M. 47 Coloured su un campione di bambini italiani , 1985 .

[23]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Training of developmental surface dyslexia improves reading performance and shortens eye fixation duration in reading , 2002 .

[24]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers: Where are the differences? , 2006, Brain and Language.

[25]  G Jobard,et al.  Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies , 2003, NeuroImage.

[26]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme–phoneme correspondence , 1999, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[27]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Vanessa E. G. Martens,et al.  The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children , 2006, Brain and Language.

[29]  Edward Herskovits,et al.  The roles of the “visual word form area” in reading , 2005, NeuroImage.

[30]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.