One, two, and many--a perspective on what groups of Drosophila melanogaster can tell us about social dynamics.

In the natural world, interactions between individuals occur in groups: an individual must recognize others, identify social opportunities, and discriminate among these options to engage in an interactive behavior. The presence of the group is known to exert an influence on individual group members, and this influence may feed back through the individual to affect behavior across the group. Such feedback has been observed in Drosophila melanogaster, for example, when mating frequency increases in groups composed of mixed strains compared to homogenous groups (Krupp et al., 2008 and Billeter et al. 2012). A working hypothesis is that social processes-to recognize, identify, discriminate, and engage-are innate. They rely on a combination of genetic inheritance, molecular interactions, and cell circuitry that produce neural and immunological responses. Here, we discuss studies that emphasize social interactions in four categories in Drosophila melanogaster: learning, circadian clocks, aggression, and mating. We also speculate that a systems-level network approach to the study of Drosophila groups will be instrumental in understanding the genetic basis of emergent group-level behavior.

[1]  J. Krause,et al.  Exploring Animal Social Networks , 2008 .

[2]  Marcel Dicke,et al.  Pheromone-mediated aggregation in nonsocial arthropods: an evolutionary ecological perspective. , 2005, Annual review of entomology.

[3]  N. Christakis,et al.  A Model of Genetic Variation in Human Social Networks , 2010 .

[4]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Learning and memory associated with aggression in Drosophila melanogaster , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Identification of an aggression-promoting pheromone and its receptor neurons in Drosophila , 2009, Nature.

[6]  S. Benzer,et al.  From the gene to behavior. , 1971, JAMA.

[7]  G. Davis,et al.  arouser Reveals a Role for Synapse Number in the Regulation of Ethanol Sensitivity , 2011, Neuron.

[8]  Ary A. Hoffmann,et al.  A laboratory study of male territoriality in the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Jeffrey C. Hall Courtship lite: a personal history of reproductive behavioral neurogenetics in Drosophila. , 2002, Journal of neurogenetics.

[10]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[11]  E. Danchin,et al.  Non-independence of individuals in a population of Drosophila melanogaster: effects on spatial distribution and dispersal. , 2001, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[12]  Charalambos P. Kyriacou,et al.  Temporal Mating Isolation Driven by a Behavioral Gene in Drosophila , 2003, Current Biology.

[13]  David J. Anderson,et al.  A single population of olfactory sensory neurons mediates an innate avoidance behaviour in Drosophila , 2004, Nature.

[14]  M. Dow,et al.  Aggression and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster , 1975, Nature.

[15]  T. Chapman,et al.  Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004, Science.

[17]  M. Bate Making sense of behavior. , 1998, The International journal of developmental biology.

[18]  J. Saltz,et al.  Natural Genetic Variation in Social Niche Construction: Social Effects of Aggression Drive Disruptive Sexual Selection in Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[19]  T. Préat,et al.  Social Facilitation of Long-Lasting Memory Retrieval in Drosophila , 2009, Current Biology.

[20]  S. Brenner The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1974, Genetics.

[21]  Shree Ram Singh,et al.  Female remating, sperm competition and sexual selection in Drosophila. , 2002, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[22]  R. Greenspan,et al.  Molecular analysis of flies selected for aggressive behavior , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[23]  J. Belote,et al.  Male Drosophila melanogaster adjust ejaculate size based on female mating status, fecundity, and age , 2011 .

[24]  Ralph J Greenspan,et al.  Serotonin and neuropeptide F have opposite modulatory effects on fly aggression , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[25]  Paul J Shaw,et al.  Waking Experience Affects Sleep Need in Drosophila , 2006, Science.

[26]  Ravi Allada,et al.  Circadian organization of behavior and physiology in Drosophila. , 2010, Annual review of physiology.

[27]  A. J. Moore,et al.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  R. Dukas,et al.  Social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  I. Coolen,et al.  Public Versus Personal Information for Mate Copying in an Invertebrate , 2009, Current Biology.

[30]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Specific subgroups of FruM neurons control sexually dimorphic patterns of aggression in Drosophila melanogaster , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  F. Mery,et al.  Spread of Social Information and Dynamics of Social Transmission within Drosophila Groups , 2012, Current Biology.

[32]  A. Hoffmann The influence of age and experience with conspecifics on territorial behavior inDrosophila melanogaster , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[33]  A. Hoffmann Heritable variation for territorial success in two Drosophila melanogaster populations , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  J. Levine,et al.  Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster , 2009, Nature.

[35]  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF NATURAL VARIATION OF BEHAVIOR IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: THE POSSIBLE ROLE OF THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT ON CREATING PERSISTENT PATTERNS OF GROUP ACTIVITY , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  J. Levine,et al.  Social Context Influences Chemical Communication in D. melanogaster Males , 2008, Current Biology.

[37]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Fighting fruit flies: A model system for the study of aggression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  S. Waddell,et al.  Drosophila olfactory memory: single genes to complex neural circuits , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  The mating advantage of rare males in Drosophila. , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Jeffrey C. Hall,et al.  Resetting the Circadian Clock by Social Experience in Drosophila melanogaster , 2002, Science.

[41]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Neurobiology of Escalated Aggression and Violence , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Troy Zars,et al.  Learning and memory in Drosophila: behavior, genetics, and neural systems. , 2011, International review of neurobiology.

[43]  K. Isono,et al.  Light wavelength dependency of mating activity in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. , 2002, Genes & genetic systems.

[44]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Aggression in invertebrates , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[45]  H. Dierick Fly Fighting: Octopamine Modulates Aggression , 2008, Current Biology.

[46]  J. Levine,et al.  Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  V. Sharma,et al.  Social synchronization of circadian locomotor activity rhythm in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[48]  P. Hardin,et al.  Nocturnal Male Sex Drive in Drosophila , 2007, Current Biology.

[49]  Paul J Shaw,et al.  Use-Dependent Plasticity in Clock Neurons Regulates Sleep Need in Drosophila , 2009, Science.

[50]  M. Newman Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[51]  C. Robin,et al.  Fighting fly genes. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[52]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[53]  L. Ehrman A factor influencing the rare male mating advantage inDrosophila , 1972, Behavior genetics.

[54]  R. E. Butterfield,et al.  Fitness consequences of social network position in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus) , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[55]  Ronald L. Davis,et al.  Thirty years of olfactory learning and memory research in Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.