Evolution of the structure of a gas–liquid two-phase flow in a large vertical pipe

The evolution of the structure of a gas–liquid flow in a large vertical pipe of 195 mm inner diameter was investigated at the TOPFLOW test facility in Rossendorf. Wire-mesh sensors were used to measure sequences of two-dimensional distributions of local instantaneous gas fraction within the complete pipe cross-section. The sensors own a resolution of 3 mm at a frequency of 2500 Hz. Superficial velocities were varied in a range covering flow regimes from bubbly to churn-turbulent flow. The distance between the gas injection and the sensor position was changed using a so-called variable gas injection system. It consists of six gas injection units, each equipped with three rings of injection orifices in the pipe wall (orifice diameter: 1 and 4 mm), which are fed from ring chambers. The gas flow towards these distributor chambers is individually controlled by valves. Measured bubble-size resolved radial gas fraction profiles reveal differences in the lateral migration of bubbles of different size starting from the injection at the wall. The evolution of bubble-size distributions allows to study bubble coalescence and break-up. The influence of the physical properties of the fluid was studied by comparing cold air–water experiments with steam–water tests at 65 bar.

[1]  Horst-Michael Prasser,et al.  Fast wire-mesh sensors for gas-liquid flows - Visualisation with up to 10 000 frames per second , 2002 .

[2]  Frank-Peter Weiss,et al.  Influence of the Pipe Diameter on the Structure of the Gas-Liquid Interface in a Vertical Two-Phase Pipe Flow , 2005 .

[3]  Horst-Michael Prasser,et al.  Wire-mesh sensors for high-resolving two-phase flow studies at high pressures and temperatures , 2007 .

[4]  H. Prasser,et al.  A new electrode-mesh tomograph for gas–liquid flows , 1998 .

[5]  S. G. Bankoff,et al.  A high resolution resistivity probe for determination of local void properties in gas‐liquid flow , 1963 .

[6]  Kimitoshi Yoneda,et al.  New Interfacial Drag Force Model Including Effect of Bubble Wake, (II): Model Validation Using Experimental Data of Steam-Water Bubbly Flow in Large-Diameter Pipes , 1999 .

[7]  Hideo Nakamura,et al.  Two-phase phase distribution in a vertical large diameter pipe , 2005 .

[8]  H. Jaegers,et al.  Operation conditions of the emergency condenser of the SWR1000 , 1999 .

[9]  Ion Tiseanu,et al.  Comparison between wire-mesh sensor and ultra-fast X-ray tomograph for an air–water flow in a vertical pipe , 2005 .

[10]  Akira Ohnuki,et al.  An experimental study on developing air-water two-phase flow along a large vertical pipe: effect of air injection method , 1996 .

[11]  Eckhard Krepper,et al.  Evolution of the two-phase flow in a vertical tube—decomposition of gas fraction profiles according to bubble size classes using wire-mesh sensors , 2002 .

[12]  Akira Ohnuki,et al.  Experimental study on transition of flow pattern and phase distribution in upward air–water two-phase flow along a large vertical pipe , 2000 .

[13]  H. Prasser,et al.  Bubble size measurement using wire-mesh sensors , 2001 .

[14]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Interfacial area of bubbly flow in a relatively large diameter pipe , 2002 .

[15]  Frank-Peter Weiss,et al.  TOPFLOW : a new multipurpose thermalhydraulic test facility for the investigation of steady state and transient two phase flow phenomena , 2001 .