Joint Implementation in Climate Change Policy

The textbook economists' model of a tradable permit system cannot usually be applied perfectly at either the domestic or international scale because of the difficulty and/or expense of defining allocations to and monitoring emissions of some groups, as well as for political reasons. It may be impossible to bring these groups fully into a tradeable permit system but it is often possible to find compromise solutions to gain some benefits from trade. This paper explores this problem in the context of the Joint Implementation mechanism associated with the Kyoto Protocol. This paper starts by outlining the current international rules governing Joint Implementation. We provide a summary of key jargon for those who are unfamiliar with the complex Kyoto language. We then discuss two key international issues that are still unresolved: baseline development and monitoring. We then turn to domestic governance of Joint Implementation and how the private sector might engage in Joint Implementation. At this point we consider how Joint Implementation fits within the suite of Kyoto flexibility mechanisms, why sellers and buyers might choose to engage in each, and how the different mechanisms might interact in the market for tradeable units. We conclude with some thoughts about productive directions for future research.

[1]  Andries Nentjes,et al.  International Tradable Carbon Permits as a Strong Form of Joint Implementation , 1997 .

[2]  Michael A. Ridley Lowering the Cost of Emission Reduction: Joint Implementation in the Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1998 .

[3]  Catrinus Jepma,et al.  The feasibility of joint implementation , 1995 .

[4]  W. Gaast The Scope for Joint Implementation in the EU Candidate Countries , 2002 .

[5]  Edwin Woerdman,et al.  Implementing the Kyoto protocol: why JI and CDM show more promise than international emissions trading , 2000 .

[6]  Katie Begg,et al.  JI/CDM crediting under the Kyoto Protocol: does ‘interim period banking’ help or hinder GHG emissions reduction? , 1999 .

[7]  Axel Michaelowa,et al.  A qualitative method to consider leakage effects from CDM and JI projects , 2002 .

[8]  F. Førsund,et al.  Economic Instruments for Air Pollution Control , 1994 .

[9]  Peter Bohm,et al.  Emission Quota Trade among the Few: Laboratory Evidence of Joint Implementation among Committed Countries The Complete Version , 1998 .

[10]  Henning Rentz,et al.  Joint implementation and the question of `additionality'--a proposal for a pragmatic approach to identify possible joint implementation projects , 1998 .

[11]  Joint implementation under asymmetric information and strategic behavior , 1996 .

[12]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Carbon Dynamics and Land-Use Choices: Building a Regional-Scale Multidisciplinary Model , 2003 .

[13]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Tropical Forest Protection, Uncertainty, and the Environmental Integrity of Carbon Mitigation Policies , 2004 .

[14]  F. Wirl,et al.  Joint Implementation: Strategic Reactions and Possible Remedies , 1998 .

[15]  Making Carbon Emission Quota Agreements More Efficient: Joint Implementation versus Quota Tradability , 1994 .

[16]  S. Kerr Global emissions trading : key issues for industrialized countries , 2000 .

[17]  E. M. Bailey,et al.  Markets for Clean Air: The U.S. Acid Rain Program , 2000 .

[18]  C. Fischer,et al.  Rebating Environmental Policy Revenues: Output-Based Allocations and Tradable Performance Standards , 2001 .

[19]  Hyo-sun Kim,et al.  Pollution for Sale: Emissions Trading and Joint Implementation: Steve Sorrell, Jim Skea (Eds); Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 1999, pp. 390, Price US$100, hardcover, ISBN 1-84064-010-3 , 2000 .

[20]  Determining Project-Based Emissions Baselines with Incomplete Information , 2002 .

[21]  Zhongxiang Zhang International rules for greenhouse gas emissions trading , 1999 .

[22]  A. Nentjes Control of reciprocal transboundary air pollution and Joint Implementation. , 1994 .

[23]  J. Janssen (Self-) Enforcement of Joint Implementation and Clean Development Mechanism Contracts , 1999 .