Oculomotor capture is influenced by expected reward value but (maybe) not predictiveness

A large body of research has shown that learning about relationships between neutral stimuli and events of significance – rewards or punishments – influences the extent to which people attend to those stimuli in the future. However, different accounts of this influence differ in terms of the critical variable that is proposed to determine learned changes in attention. We describe two experiments using eye-tracking with a rewarded visual search procedure to investigate whether attentional capture is influenced by the predictiveness of stimuli (i.e., the extent to which they provide information about upcoming events) or by their absolute associative value (i.e., the expected incentive value of the outcome that a stimulus predicts). Results demonstrated a clear influence of associative value on the likelihood that stimuli will capture eye-movements, but the evidence for a distinct influence of predictiveness was less compelling. The results of these experiments can be reconciled within a simple account under which attentional prioritization is a monotonic function of the expected, subjective value of the reward that is signalled by a stimulus.

[1]  P. Eimas.  Effects of overtraining and age on intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in children. , 1966, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  R. Rescorla.  A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[3]  N. Mackintosh.  A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[4]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  H. Terrace,et al.  Partial reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons , 1980 .

[6]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980 .

[7]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  J. Pearce,et al.  Restoration of the Orienting Response to a Light by a Change in its Predictive Accuracy , 1992 .

[9]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[11]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[13]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[14]  I. Mclaren,et al.  Learned Associability and Associative Change in Human Causal Learning , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[15]  M. Pelley.  The Role of Associative History in Models of Associative Learning: A Selective Review and a Hybrid Model: , 2004 .

[16]  Aaron B. Hoffman,et al.  Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[18]  Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Two kinds of attention in Pavlovian conditioning: evidence for a hybrid model of learning. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Two theories of attention: a review and a possible integration , 2010 .

[21]  Computational Models of Conditioning: The hybrid modeling approach to conditioning , 2010 .

[22]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[23]  M. Pelley,et al.  Learned predictiveness effects following single-cue training in humans , 2010, Learning & behavior.

[24]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M. L. Le Pelley,et al.  Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[27]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  W. Zoest,et al.  Reward creates oculomotor salience , 2012, Current Biology.

[29]  Guillem R. Esber,et al.  Modeling attention in associative learning: Two processes or one? , 2012, Learning & behavior.

[30]  Miguel A. Vadillo,et al.  Learned predictiveness influences rapid attentional capture: evidence from the dot probe task. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Extreme outcomes sway risky decisions from experience , 2014 .

[32]  Jeffrey M. Pisklak,et al.  Reward context determines risky choice in pigeons and humans , 2014, Biology Letters.

[33]  Florian Kattner.  Transfer of absolute and relative predictiveness in human contingency learning , 2015, Learning & behavior.

[34]  P. Anselme,et al.  Incentive salience attribution under reward uncertainty: A Pavlovian model , 2015, Behavioural Processes.

[35]  Steven B. Most,et al.  Cognitive control and counterproductive oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli , 2015 .

[36]  David Luque,et al.  Goal-directed EEG activity evoked by discriminative stimuli in reinforcement learning. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[37]  M. L. Le Pelley,et al.  Uncertainty and predictiveness determine attention to cues during human associative learning , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Tom Beesley,et al.  When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Melissa J. Green,et al.  Disrupted attentional learning in high schizotypy: Evidence of aberrant salience. , 2016, British journal of psychology.

[41]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Value-modulated oculomotor capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is a consequence of early competition on the saccade map , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[42]  J. Schreiber.  Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[43]  Christopher J. Mitchell,et al.  Attention and associative learning in humans: An integrative review. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  B. Anderson.  The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection , 2016, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[45]  G. Hall,et al.  Attention to perceive, to learn and to respond , 2019, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  R. Boakes.  Performance on Learning to Associate a Stimulus with Positive Reinforcement , 2021, Operant-Pavlovian Interactions.