Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles: Examining the Political, Moral, and Social Implications

Abstract : There will likely be political, moral, and social implications of UCAV employment that strategists and military commanders will need to pay attention to as they craft strategies for future conflict. UCAVs are a very appealing option for the politician faced with use-of-force decisions due to reduced forward basing requirements and the possibility of zero friendly operator casualties. The flexibility of the weapon system offers the politician a seemingly high degree of control over the process of war. Together, these advantages may make a politician more inclined to use force first rather than last. In the moral realm, UCAVs are neither immoral nor illegal simply because risk to one of the combatants is removed. Additionally, notions of chivalry and fairness are not good standards by which to judge this technology. The social impact of widespread UCAV employment on the operator is an area of further concern. Remote-control war, however, does not change the underlying assumptions that have been the basis for the military ethos in the past. The final chapter highlights the dynamic between political, moral, and social issues as it addresses a range of possible unintended consequences resulting from extensive UCAV employment. Ultimately, the purpose of this thesis is to provide strategists greater clarity on the political, moral, and social issues surrounding UCAV employment. Doing so allows them to more effectively address, both objectively and subjectively, the implications of this new technology.

[1]  R. R. Woodley Unmanned Aerial Warfare: Strategic Help or Hindrance? , 2012 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[3]  M. Walzer Just and Unjust Wars , 1977 .

[4]  Daniel E. Soller Operational Ethics: Just War and Implications for Contemporary American Warfare , 2012 .

[5]  Ralph Wetterhahn The Last Battle: The Mayaguez Incident and the End of the Vietnam War , 2001 .

[6]  E. Luttwak A Post-Heroic Military Policy , 1996 .

[7]  John A. Lynn,et al.  Battle: A History Of Combat And Culture , 2003 .

[8]  Karl P. Mueller Politics, Death, and Morality in US Foreign Policy , 2000 .

[9]  Tomislav Z. Ruby,et al.  Morality and Modern Air War , 2000 .

[10]  Dunlap,et al.  Technology and the 21st Century Battlefield: Recomplicating Moral Life for the Statesman and the Soldier , 2004 .

[11]  P. Christopher The Ethics of War and Peace: An Introduction to Legal and Moral Issues , 1994 .

[12]  David W. Buckingham,et al.  The Warrior Ethos. , 1999 .

[13]  Eric V. Larson Casualties and Consensus: The Historical Role of Casualties in Domestic Support for U , 1996 .

[14]  Christopher Bolkcom,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Background and Issues for Congress , 2003 .

[15]  John Stillion,et al.  A Global Access Strategy for the U.S. Air Force , 2002 .

[16]  Carl H. Builder,et al.  The Masks of War: American Military Styles in Strategy and Analysis , 1989 .

[17]  James Turner Johnson,et al.  Morality and Contemporary Warfare , 2002 .

[18]  A. Coates The Ethics of War , 1997 .

[19]  Samuel Greengard,et al.  The new face of war , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[20]  Eliot A. Cohen,et al.  The Mystique of U.S. Air Power , 1994 .

[21]  Peter S. Temes The Just War: An American Reflection on the Morality of War in Our Time , 2003 .

[22]  P. Taylor,et al.  Munitions of the mind , 1995 .

[23]  Philip M. Flammer Conflicting Loyalties and the American Military Ethic , 1976 .

[24]  D. Grossman On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society , 1996 .

[25]  P. Ramsey The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility , 1991 .

[26]  Shannon E. French The Code of the Warrior: Exploring Warrior Values Past and Present , 2003 .

[27]  Max Boot The New American Way of War , 2003 .

[28]  Mark T Matthews,et al.  A Search for Warriors: The Effects of Technology on the Air Force Ethos , 2012 .