RESPONSES OF TUNDRA PLANTS TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING:META‐ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TUNDRA EXPERIMENT

The International Tundra Experiment (ITEX) is a collaborative, multisite experiment using a common temperature manipulation to examine variability in species response across climatic and geographic gradients of tundra ecosystems. ITEX was designed specifically to examine variability in arctic and alpine species response to increased temperature. We compiled from one to four years of experimental data from 13 different ITEX sites and used meta-analysis to analyze responses of plant phenology, growth, and reproduction to experimental warming. Results indicate that key phenological events such as leaf bud burst and flowering occurred earlier in warmed plots throughout the study period; however, there was little impact on growth cessation at the end of the season. Quantitative measures of vegetative growth were greatest in warmed plots in the early years of the experiment, whereas reproductive effort and success increased in later years. A shift away from vegetative growth and toward reproductive effort and success in the fourth treatment year suggests a shift from the initial response to a secondary response. The change in vegetative response may be due to depletion of stored plant reserves, whereas the lag in reproductive response may be due to the formation of flower buds one to several seasons prior to flowering. Both vegetative and reproductive responses varied among life-forms; herbaceous forms had stronger and more consistent vegetative growth responses than did woody forms. The greater responsiveness of the herbaceous forms may be attributed to their more flexible morphology and to their relatively greater proportion of stored plant reserves. Finally, warmer, low arctic sites produced the strongest growth responses, but colder sites produced a greater reproductive response. Greater resource investment in vegetative growth may be a conservative strategy in the Low Arctic, where there is more competition for light, nutrients, or water, and there may be little opportunity for successful germination or seedling development. In contrast, in the High Arctic, heavy investment in producing seed under a higher temperature scenario may provide an opportunity for species to colonize patches of unvegetated ground. The observed differential response to warming suggests that the primary forces driving the response vary across climatic zones, functional groups, and through time.

[1]  David T. Tissue,et al.  Response of Eriophorum Vaginatum to Elevated CO_2 and Temperature in the Alaskan Tussock Tundra , 1987 .

[2]  M. D. Walker,et al.  Effects of interannual climate variation on phenology and growth of two alpine forbs , 1995 .

[3]  W. D. Billings.  5 – Phytogeographic and Evolutionary Potential of the Arctic Flora and Vegetation in a Changing Climate , 1992 .

[4]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES , 1999 .

[5]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Growth responses of Calamagrostis lapponica to simulated environmental change in the sub-arctic , 1995 .

[6]  W. D. Billings.  Arctic and Alpine Vegetations: Similarities, Differences, and Susceptibility to Disturbance , 1973 .

[7]  C. Körner,et al.  11 – Response of Alpine Vegetation to Elevated CO2 , 1996 .

[8]  N. Grulke,et al.  Comparative Life History Characteristics of Two High Arctic Grasses, Northwest Territories , 1988 .

[9]  P. Webber.  BELOWGROUND TUNDRA RESEARCH: A COMMENTARY , 1977 .

[10]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[11]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Individualistic Growth Response of Tundra Plant Species to Environmental Manipulations in the Field , 1985 .

[12]  R. Mangan,et al.  Vertical distribution of organic matter in eight vegetation types near Eagle Summit, Alaska , 1982 .

[13]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-analysis with Resampling Tests , 1997 .

[14]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Population Structure and Processes of Tundra Plants and Vegetation , 1985 .

[15]  G. Shaver,et al.  THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF LIVE VASCULAR PHYTOMASS IN COTTONGRASS TUSSOCK TUNDRA , 1979 .

[16]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Differential growth, allocation and photosynthetic responses of Polygonum viviparum to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semi-desert , 1994 .

[17]  G. Shaver.  Plant functional types and ecosystem change in arctic tundras , 1997 .

[18]  T. Callaghan,et al.  COMPARATIVE RESPONSES OF PHENOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT TO SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE IN SUB-ARCTIC AND HIGH ARCTIC PLANTS , 1993 .

[19]  U. Molau,et al.  Responses of Dryas octopetala to ITEX environmental manipulations: a synthesis with circumpolar comparisons , 1997 .

[20]  K. Nadelhoffer,et al.  EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND SUBSTRATE QUALITY ON ELEMENT MINERALIZATION IN SIX ARCTIC SOILS , 1991 .

[21]  L. C. Bliss,et al.  6 – Plant Succession, Competition, and the Physiological Constraints of Species in the Arctic , 1992 .

[22]  M. V. Price,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXPERIMENTAL WARMING ON PLANT REPRODUCTIVE PHENOLOGY IN A SUBALPINE MEADOW , 1998 .

[23]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Consequences of Nonequilibrium Resource Availability Across Multiple Time Scales: The Transient Maxima Hypothesis , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[24]  S. Isard.  THE EFFECT OF SLOPE-ASPECT ON TURBULENT TRANSFER IN AN ALPINE FELLFIELD: NIWOT RIDGE, FRONT RANGE, COLORADO , 1987 .

[25]  G. R. Shaver,et al.  Exsertion, elongation, and senescence of leaves of Eriophorum vaginatum and Carex bigelowii in Northern Alaska , 1997 .

[26]  J. Svoboda,et al.  Succession in Marginal Arctic Environments , 1987 .

[27]  Dean C. Adams,et al.  RESAMPLING TESTS FOR META‐ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL DATA , 1997 .

[28]  S. Jonasson.  Organic matter and phytomass on three north Swedish tundra sites, and some connections with adjacent tundra areas. , 1982 .

[29]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change : the IPCC scientific assessment , 1990 .

[30]  U. Molau.  Responses to natural climatic variation and experimental warming in two tundra plant species with contrasting life forms: Cassiope tetragona and Ranunculus nivalis , 1997 .

[31]  F. Gugerli,et al.  Response of Saxifraga oppositifolia L. to simulated climate change at three contrasting latitudes , 1997 .

[32]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Differential Growth Responses of Cassiope tetragona, an Arctic Dwarf-Shrub, to Environmental Perturbations among Three Contrasting High- and Subarctic Sites , 1993 .

[33]  U. Molau,et al.  Reproductive Ecology of Saxifraga oppositifolia: Phenology, Mating System, and Reproductive Success , 1992 .

[34]  J. McGraw,et al.  CHAPTER 6 – The Role of Buried Viable Seeds in Arctic and Alpine Plant Communities , 1989 .

[35]  L. Rustad,et al.  Experimental soil warming effects on CO2 and CH4 flux from a low elevation spruce–fir forest soil in Maine, USA , 1998 .

[36]  U. Molau,et al.  Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change : Biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens, and vascular plants , 1998 .

[37]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[39]  P. Mølgaard,et al.  Response to experimental warming in a population of Papaver radicatum in Greenland , 1997 .

[40]  T. E. Thórhallsdóttir.  Flowering phenology in the central highland of Iceland and implications for climatic warming in the Arctic , 1998, Oecologia.

[41]  Standing crop and net production of sedge meadows of an ungrazed polar desert oasis. , 1990 .

[42]  Barrie Maxwell,et al.  2 – Arctic Climate: Potential for Change under Global Warming , 1992 .

[43]  P. Diggle.  Extreme preformation in alpine Polygonum viviparum: an architectural and developmental analysis. , 1997, American journal of botany.

[44]  J. Reynolds,et al.  20 – Modeling the Response of Arctic Plants to Changing Climate , 1992 .

[45]  G. Henry,et al.  Open‐top designs for manipulating field temperature in high‐latitude ecosystems , 1997 .

[46]  P. Webber,et al.  Two Low Arctic Vegetation Maps near Atkasook, Alaska , 1980 .

[47]  B. Freedman,et al.  Effects of fertilization on three tundra plant communities of a polar desert oasis , 1986 .

[48]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Implications for Changes in Arctic Plant Biodiversity from Environmental Manipulation Experiments , 1995 .

[49]  F. Berendse,et al.  Nutrient use and nutrient cycling in northern ecosystems , 1992 .

[50]  F. Chapin,et al.  15 – Nutrient Absorption and Accumulation in Arctic Plants , 1991 .

[51]  F. Chapin,et al.  Physiological and Growth Responses of Arctic Plants to a Field Experiment Simulating Climatic Change , 1996 .

[52]  Donald A. Walker,et al.  Terrain, vegetation and landscape evolution of the R4D research site, Brooks Range Foothills, Alaska , 1989 .

[53]  G. Shaver,et al.  9 – Phenology, Resource Allocation, and Growth of Arctic Vascular Plants , 1992 .

[54]  Walter C. Oechel,et al.  Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source , 1993, Nature.

[55]  James B. McGraw,et al.  17 – Response of Tundra Plant Populations to Climatic Change , 1992 .

[56]  U. Molau,et al.  Plant response variables. , 1993 .

[57]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis with Resampling Tests. Version 1.Michael S. Rosenberg , Dean C. Adams , Jessica Gurevitch , 1998 .

[58]  S. Hobbie.  Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra , 1996 .

[59]  Donald A. Walker,et al.  Plant communities of a tussock tundra landscape in the Brooks Range Foothills, Alaska , 1994 .

[60]  C. Körner,et al.  Arctic and Alpine Biodiversity: Patterns, Causes and Ecosystem Consequences , 1994, Ecological Studies.

[61]  H. Ellenberg,et al.  Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. , 1989 .

[62]  I. Jónsdóttir,et al.  Clonal diversity and allozyme variation in populations of the arctic sedge Carex bigelowii (Cyperaceae). , 1996 .

[63]  L. Kärenlampi,et al.  Plant Biomass and Primary Production of Fennoscandian Subarctic and Subalpine Forests and of Alpine Willow and Heath Ecosystems , 1975 .

[64]  G. Shaver,et al.  Reproductive effort in cotton grass tussock tundra , 1982 .

[65]  N. Matveyeva,et al.  4 – Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation , 1992 .

[66]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[67]  G. Henry,et al.  Tundra plants and climate change: the International Tundra Experiment (ITEX) , 1997 .

[68]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[69]  L. Tieszen.  Photosynthesis in the Principal Barrow, Alaska, Species: A Summary of Field and Laboratory Responses , 1978 .

[70]  T. Callaghan,et al.  PLANT COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AT A HIGH ARCTIC POLAR SEMI-DESERT , 1998 .

[71]  S. D. Cooper,et al.  Effect Size in Ecological Experiments: The Application of Biological Models in Meta‐Analysis , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[72]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change , 1996 .

[73]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Responses of Arctic Tundra to Experimental and Observed Changes in Climate , 1995 .

[74]  J. McGraw,et al.  Seedling density and seedling survival in Alaskan cotton grass tussock tundra , 1982 .

[75]  W. Oechel,et al.  7 – Effects of Global Change on the Carbon Balance of Arctic Plants and Ecosystems , 1991 .