Buildings’ seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative study

A critical review and comparison of existing seismic vulnerability assessment techniques for buildings are carried out to evaluate their suitability for use in seismic risk assessment. The methods considered are “Hybrid” vulnerability assessment method, FEMA 154 (Rapid Visual Screening), Euro Code 8, New Zealand Guidelines, Modified Turkish method and NRC Guidelines. A scoring system is proposed to select the suitable vulnerability assessment technique to be utilized for three different case studies conducted in different seismicity and geological zones, that is, Dhaka, and Rangamati cities, in Bangladesh, and Kelowna, in Canada. The ranking considers general description of vulnerability, building response factors, variance in output, applicability and ease of use, which are identified as the key characteristics required for vulnerability scales used in seismic risk evaluation. A sensitivity analysis has been carried out for the different methods with regard to different weighting criteria. Furthermore, a multi-criteria decision-making tool AHP has also been utilized to find out the suitable alternatives for seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings. It was observed that the Hybrid method adequately satisfies all the criteria necessary for their use in seismic risk assessment. Vulnerability maps of different study areas using Hybrid method have been integrated into a GIS framework to visualize the building vulnerabilities in a spatial manner, which will facilitate the authority to manage effective seismic hazard risk reduction measures, including upgrading, repairing and retrofitting of structures.

[1]  Ahmet Yakut,et al.  A Screening Procedure for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Building Stocks , 2007 .

[2]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Risk-Based Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2008 .

[3]  Hugo Bachmann,et al.  On the Seismic Vulnerability of Existing Buildings: A Case Study of the City of Basel , 2004 .

[4]  Robin Spence,et al.  The Global Earthquake Vulnerability Estimation System (GEVES): an approach for earthquake risk assessment for insurance applications , 2008 .

[5]  Guido Magenes,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS , 2006 .

[6]  P. Guéguen,et al.  A simplified approach for vulnerability assessment in moderate-to-low seismic hazard regions: application to Grenoble (France) , 2007 .

[7]  T. Saaty.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[8]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[9]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Rule Base Modeling , 2010 .

[10]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Earthquake disaster risk index for Canadian cities using Bayesian belief networks , 2012 .

[11]  Shigeyuki Okada,et al.  CLASSIFICATIONS OF STRUCTURAL TYPES AND DAMAGE PATTERNS OF BUILDINGS FOR EARTHQUAKE FIELD INVESTIGATION , 1999 .

[12]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method , 2010 .

[13]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[15]  Mohammad Rafat Sadat,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings of Dhaka city , 2010 .

[16]  Arun Bapat,et al.  Damage to Tall Structures Situated at Long Distance from Epicenter Due to Long Period Seismic Waves and Effect on Structures on Filled Lands , 2008 .

[17]  A. Martinelli,et al.  Building vulnerability assessment and damage scenarios in Celano (Italy) using a quick survey data-based methodology , 2008 .

[18]  J. Bommer,et al.  Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance , 2002 .

[19]  Raúl R. Castro,et al.  Some aspects of source characteristics of the 19 September 1985 Michoacan earthquake and ground motion amplification in and near Mexico City from strong motion data , 1988 .

[20]  Tiziana Rossetto,et al.  Comparison of building damage scales and damage descriptions for use in earthquake loss modelling in Europe , 2008 .

[21]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Structural modeling uncertainties and their influence on seismic assessment of existing RC structures , 2010 .

[22]  R. Sharpe.  Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings , 1994 .

[23]  E. Reinoso,et al.  A Simplified Method for Vulnerability Assessment of Dwelling Buildings and Estimation of Damage Scenarios in Catalonia, Spain , 2006 .