On the origin of multi-component bulk metallic glasses: Atomic size mismatches and de-mixing.

The likelihood that an undercooled liquid vitrifies or crystallizes depends on the cooling rate R. The critical cooling rate R(c), below which the liquid crystallizes upon cooling, characterizes the glass-forming ability (GFA) of the system. While pure metals are typically poor glass formers with R(c)>10(12)K/s, specific multi-component alloys can form bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) even at cooling rates below R∼1 K/s. Conventional wisdom asserts that metal alloys with three or more components are better glass formers (with smaller R(c)) than binary alloys. However, there is currently no theoretical framework that provides quantitative predictions for R(c) for multi-component alloys. In this manuscript, we perform simulations of ternary hard-sphere systems, which have been shown to be accurate models for the glass-forming ability of BMGs, to understand the roles of geometric frustration and demixing in determining R(c). Specifically, we compress ternary hard sphere mixtures into jammed packings and measure the critical compression rate, below which the system crystallizes, as a function of the diameter ratios σ(B)/σ(A) and σ(C)/σ(A) and number fractions x(A), x(B), and x(C). We find two distinct regimes for the GFA in parameter space for ternary hard spheres. When the diameter ratios are close to 1, such that the largest (A) and smallest (C) species are well-mixed, the GFA of ternary systems is no better than that of the optimal binary glass former. However, when σ(C)/σ(A) ≲ 0.8 is below the demixing threshold for binary systems, adding a third component B with σ(C) < σ(B) < σ(A) increases the GFA of the system by preventing demixing of A and C. Analysis of the available data from experimental studies indicates that most ternary BMGs are below the binary demixing threshold with σ(C)/σ(A) < 0.8.

[1]  Hung Chen REVIEW ARTICLE: Glassy metals , 1980 .

[2]  A. Inoue,et al.  A new criterion for predicting the glass-forming ability of bulk metallic glasses , 2009 .

[3]  A. L. Greer,et al.  Bulk Metallic Glasses: At the Cutting Edge of Metals Research , 2007 .

[4]  Jonathan K. Kummerfeld,et al.  The densest packing of AB binary hard-sphere homogeneous compounds across all size ratios. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  F. Stillinger,et al.  Jammed hard-particle packings: From Kepler to Bernal and beyond , 2010, 1008.2982.

[6]  E. Ma,et al.  Atomic level structure in multicomponent bulk metallic glass. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[7]  C. Thompson,et al.  Matching Glass-Forming Ability with the Density of the Amorphous Phase , 2008, Science.

[8]  A. Takeuchi,et al.  Ferrous and Nonferrous Bulk Amorphous Alloys , 1998 .

[9]  P. Jalali,et al.  Competing microstructure and crystalline phase formation and their roles in glass formability: a molecular dynamics study , 2004 .

[10]  Salvatore Torquato,et al.  Densest binary sphere packings. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  A. Inoue,et al.  Amorphous Zr–Al–TM (TM=Co, Ni, Cu) Alloys with Significant Supercooled Liquid Region of Over 100 K , 1991 .

[12]  J. Schroers Bulk Metallic Glasses , 2013 .

[13]  Thomas M Truskett,et al.  Is random close packing of spheres well defined? , 2000, Physical review letters.

[14]  Jonathan P. K. Doye,et al.  The favored cluster structures of model glass formers , 2003 .

[15]  Takeshi Egami,et al.  Atomic size effect on the formability of metallic glasses , 1984 .

[16]  A. L. Greer,et al.  Metallic glasses…on the threshold , 2009 .

[17]  Daniel B. Miracle A structural model for metallic glasses , 2004 .

[18]  Daniel B. Miracle,et al.  The density and packing fraction of binary metallic glasses , 2013 .

[19]  A. Inoue Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys , 2000 .

[20]  Pablo G. Debenedetti,et al.  Supercooled liquids and the glass transition , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Jiangwei Wang,et al.  Formation of monatomic metallic glasses through ultrafast liquid quenching , 2014, Nature.

[22]  Thomas M Truskett,et al.  Towards a quantification of disorder in materials: distinguishing equilibrium and glassy sphere packings , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[23]  A. Takeuchi,et al.  Calculations of amorphous-forming composition range for ternary alloy systems and analyses of stabilization of amorphous phase and amorphous-forming ability , 2001 .

[24]  D. Turnbull,et al.  Free‐Volume Model of the Amorphous Phase: Glass Transition , 1961 .

[25]  C. O’Hern,et al.  Tuning jammed frictionless disk packings from isostatic to hyperstatic. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Daniel B. Miracle,et al.  The influence of efficient atomic packing on the constitution of metallic glasses , 2003 .

[27]  P. Harrowell,et al.  Dense packings of hard spheres of different sizes based on filling interstices in uniform three-dimensional tilings. , 2008, Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

[28]  A. L. Greer,et al.  Confusion by design , 1993, Nature.

[29]  Salvatore Torquato,et al.  Disordered strictly jammed binary sphere packings attain an anomalously large range of densities. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  P. Steinhardt,et al.  Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses , 1983 .

[31]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Connection between the packing efficiency of binary hard spheres and the glass-forming ability of bulk metallic glasses. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  F. Stillinger,et al.  Phase diagram and structural diversity of the densest binary sphere packings. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[33]  J. Bai,et al.  Atomic packing and short-to-medium-range order in metallic glasses , 2006, Nature.

[34]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  Mean-field theory of hard sphere glasses and jamming , 2008, 0802.2180.