Predicting the potential geographic distribution of weeds in 2080.

Accounting for climate change is an important factor to consider in weed risk assessments and can be useful when planning strategic management approaches and targeting weed education initiatives. Global climate modelling has now reached a sufficient level of maturity that regional climate models can be used with greater confidence to apply future climate scenarios to biophysical models. Data from four Global Climate Models using four SRES emission scenarios (IPCC 2000) were used to develop a framework for generating climate change surfaces for use in CLIMEXTM. The supplied variables were transformed and reformatted and, where necessary, new variables were estimated. Using this framework, future climate surfaces can be generated for any user-defined period up to 2100 and applied to any base climatology by interpolating the change surfaces. The future climate surfaces have been applied to the climate models of three important weeds in Australia with contrasting climatic requirements ( prickly acacia, Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Delile, Siam weed Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob., and buddleia, Buddleja davidii Franch.) to show a range of possible future distributions for them in Australia.

[1]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[2]  J. R. Brown,et al.  Climate change and biotic invasions: a case history of a tropical woody vine , 2003, Biological Invasions.

[3]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Life history variation in plants: an exploration of the fast-slow continuum hypothesis , 1996 .

[4]  D. Kriticos,et al.  A comparison of systems to analyze potential weed distributions. , 2001 .

[5]  Steve W. Adkins,et al.  Climate change and the potential distribution of an invasive alien plant: Acacia nilotica ssp. indica in Australia , 2003 .

[6]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  The effects of fragmentation and disturbance of rainforest on ground‐dwelling small mammals on the Robertson Plateau, New South Wales, Australia , 1996, Journal of Biogeography.

[7]  D. Kriticos,et al.  The potential distribution of Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed) in relation to climate , 2005 .

[8]  Seong-Joong Kim,et al.  A coupled climate model simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum, Part 1: transient multi-decadal response , 2002 .

[9]  R. W. Sutherst,et al.  A computerised system for matching climates in ecology , 1985 .

[10]  Anthony C. Hirst,et al.  Comparison of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model with and without oceanic eddy-induced advection. Part I: Ocean spinup and control integrations , 2000 .

[11]  T. Carter,et al.  GUIDELINES ON THE USE OF SCENARIO DATA FOR CLIMATE IMPACT AND ADAPTATION ASSESSMENT Version 1 December 1999 Task Group on Scenarios for Climate Impact Assessment Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[12]  N. Crossman,et al.  Something's bugging butterfly bush in Tasmania. , 2006 .

[13]  E. Roeckner,et al.  Interpretation of interbasin exchange in an isopycnal ocean model , 1998 .

[14]  M. Robertson,et al.  Environmental limits to the distribution of Scaevola plumieri along the South African coast , 2003 .

[15]  T. Wigley,et al.  Climate Changes in the 21st Century over the Asia-Pacific Region Simulated by the NCAR CSM and PCM , 2001 .

[16]  C. Parmesan,et al.  Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming , 1999, Nature.

[17]  Darren J. Kriticos,et al.  THE ROLE OF ECOLOGICAL MODELLING IN WEED MANAGEMENT , 1996 .