The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing

In previous research it has been shown that subject relative clauses are easier to process than object relative clauses. Several theories have been proposed that explain the difference on the basis of different theoretical perspectives. However, previous research tested relative clauses only with animate protagonists. In a corpus study of Dutch and German newspaper texts, we show that animacy is an important determinant of the distribution of subject and object relative clauses. In two experiments in Dutch, in which the animacy of the object of the relative clause is varied, no difference in reading time is obtained between subject and object relative clauses when the object is inanimate. The experiments show that animacy influences the processing difficulty of relative clauses. These results can only be accounted for by current major theories of relative clause processing when additional assumptions are introduced, and at the same time show that the possibility of semantically driven analysis can be considered as a serious alternative.

[1]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[2]  Carlo Cecchetto,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1996 .

[3]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Processing of Locally Ambiguous Relative Clauses in German , 1995 .

[4]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian , 1988, Cognition.

[6]  Kate Stewart,et al.  Starting points , 2020, SIGP.

[7]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Clause Wrap-Up on Eye Movements during Reading , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[9]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Lexical Processing during Saccadic Eye Movements , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[12]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990 .

[14]  David A. Zubin Discourse Function of Morphology: The Focus System in German , 1979 .

[15]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences. , 1981 .

[17]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[18]  Lars Konieczny,et al.  The Role of Lexical Heads in Parsing: Evidence from German , 1997 .

[19]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Monitoring around the relative clause , 1980 .

[20]  Lars Konieczny,et al.  Human sentence processing: a semantics-oriented parsing approach , 1996 .

[21]  Marily Ford,et al.  A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences , 1983 .

[22]  L. Frazier,et al.  Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .

[23]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .

[24]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach , 1997 .

[26]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[27]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[28]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses in English Conversation. , 1990 .

[29]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  STARTING POINTS , 1977 .