Stage-specific suppression of basal defense discriminates barley plants containing fast- and delayed-acting Mla powdery mildew resistance alleles.

Nonspecific recognition of pathogen-derived general elicitors triggers the first line of plant basal defense, which in turn, preconditions the host towards resistance or susceptibility. To elucidate how basal defense responses influence the onset of Mla (mildew resistance locus a)-specified resistance, we performed a meta-analysis of GeneChip mRNA expression for 155 basal defense-related genes of barley (Hordeum vulgare) challenged with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei, the causal agent of powdery mildew disease. In plants containing the fast-acting Mla1, Mla6, or Mla13 alleles, transcripts hyper-accumulated from 0 to 16 h after inoculation (hai) in both compatible and incompatible interactions. Suppression of basal defense-related transcripts was observed after 16 hai only in compatible interactions, whereas these transcripts were sustained or increased in incompatible interactions. By contrast, in plants containing wild-type and mutants of the delayed-acting Mla12 allele, an early hyper-induction of transcripts from 0 to 8 hai was observed, but the expression of many of these genes is markedly suppressed from 8 to 16 hai. These results suggest that the inhibition of basal defense facilitates the development of haustoria by the pathogen, consequently delaying the onset of host resistance responses. Thus, we hypothesize that the regulation of basal defense influences host-cell accessibility to the fungal pathogen and drives allelic diversification of gene-specific resistance phenotypes.

[1]  J. Dangl,et al.  Antagonistic Control of Disease Resistance Protein Stability in the Plant Immune System , 2005, Science.

[2]  Christian Pilarsky,et al.  Meta-analysis of microarray data on pancreatic cancer defines a set of commonly dysregulated genes , 2005, Oncogene.

[3]  M. G. Kim,et al.  Two Pseudomonas syringae Type III Effectors Inhibit RIN4-Regulated Basal Defense in Arabidopsis , 2005, Cell.

[4]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  Barley Rom1 reveals a potential link between race-specific and nonhost resistance responses to powdery mildew fungi. , 2005, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[5]  R. Hückelhoven Powdery mildew susceptibility and biotrophic infection strategies. , 2005, FEMS microbiology letters.

[6]  Jian Gong,et al.  BarleyBase—an expression profiling database for plant genomics , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Justus-Liebig-University Giessen Powdery mildew susceptibility and biotrophic infection strategies , 2005 .

[8]  John R. Stevens,et al.  Combining Affymetrix microarray results , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  RAR1 Positively Controls Steady State Levels of Barley MLA Resistance Proteins and Enables Sufficient MLA6 Accumulation for Effective Resistance , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[10]  Kevin R. Coombes,et al.  Differences in gene expression between B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and normal B cells: a meta-analysis of three microarray studies , 2004, Bioinform..

[11]  Ferdinando Di Cunto,et al.  CLOE: Identification of putative functional relationships among genes by comparison of expression profiles between two species , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  T. Hartung,et al.  Innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana: lipopolysaccharides activate nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and induce defense genes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Alfano,et al.  Disabling surveillance: bacterial type III secretion system effectors that suppress innate immunity , 2004, Cellular microbiology.

[14]  D. Nettleton,et al.  Interaction-Dependent Gene Expression in Mla-Specified Response to Barley Powdery Mildeww⃞ , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[15]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  MergeMaid: R Tools for Merging and Cross-Study Validation of Gene Expression Data , 2004, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[16]  G. Martin,et al.  Strategies used by bacterial pathogens to suppress plant defenses. , 2004, Current opinion in plant biology.

[17]  A. Collmer,et al.  EFFECTOR PROTEINS : Double Agents in Bacterial Disease and Plant Defense , 2004 .

[18]  P. Brown,et al.  Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  The Transcriptional Innate Immune Response to flg22. Interplay and Overlap with Avr Gene-Dependent Defense Responses and Bacterial Pathogenesis1[w] , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[20]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception , 2004, Nature.

[21]  Roger P Wise,et al.  A single-amino acid substitution in the sixth leucine-rich repeat of barley MLA6 and MLA13 alleviates dependence on RAR1 for disease resistance signaling. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[22]  L. Piater,et al.  Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences , 2004, Immunological reviews.

[23]  Rod A Wing,et al.  A New Resource for Cereal Genomics: 22K Barley GeneChip Comes of Age1 , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[24]  Debashis Ghosh,et al.  Statistical issues and methods for meta-analysis of microarray data: a case study in prostate cancer , 2003, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[25]  W. M. Krugera,et al.  Transcription of the defense response genes chitinase IIb , PAL and peroxidase is induced by the barley powdery mildew fungus and is only indirectly modulated by R genes , 2004 .

[26]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  Establishment of biotrophy by parasitic fungi and reprogramming of host cells for disease resistance. , 2003, Annual review of phytopathology.

[27]  A. Bogdanove,et al.  Understanding the functions of plant disease resistance proteins. , 2003, Annual review of plant biology.

[28]  T. Eulgem,et al.  Recognition and response in the plant immune system. , 2003, Annual review of genetics.

[29]  B. De Moor,et al.  Comparison and meta-analysis of microarray data: from the bench to the computer desk. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[30]  L. Szabo,et al.  Transcription of the defense response genes chitinase IIb, PAL and peroxidase is induced by the barley powdery mildew fungus and is only indirectly modulated by R genes , 2003 .

[31]  R. Panstruga Establishing compatibility between plants and obligate biotrophic pathogens. , 2003, Current opinion in plant biology.

[32]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  Recognition Specificity and RAR1/SGT1 Dependence in Barley Mla Disease Resistance Genes to the Powdery Mildew Fungus Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.009258. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[34]  F. Wei,et al.  Powdery Mildew-Induced Mla mRNAs Are Alternatively Spliced and Contain Multiple Upstream Open Reading Frames1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[35]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical Significance for Genome-Wide Studies , 2003 .

[36]  T. Barrette,et al.  Meta-analysis of microarrays: interstudy validation of gene expression profiles reveals pathway dysregulation in prostate cancer. , 2002, Cancer research.

[37]  T. Carver,et al.  Effects of inhibiting phenolic biosynthesis on penetration resistance of barley isolines containing seven powdery mildew resistance genes or alleles , 2002 .

[38]  D. Philpott,et al.  Intracellular vs extracellular recognition of pathogens--common concepts in mammals and flies. , 2002, Trends in microbiology.

[39]  W. Bushnell,et al.  The formation and function of infection and feeding structures. , 2002 .

[40]  W. Bushnell,et al.  Localized induction of accessibility and inaccessibility by powdery mildew. , 2002 .

[41]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection , 2001, Nature.

[42]  Mark Anderson,et al.  Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis , 2001, Technometrics.

[43]  M. Soller,et al.  A whole genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting milk protein percentage in Israeli-Holstein cattle, by means of selective milk DNA pooling in a daughter design, using an adjusted false discovery rate criterion. , 2001, Genetics.

[44]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  The MLA6 coiled-coil, NBS-LRR protein confers AvrMla6-dependent resistance specificity to Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei in barley and wheat. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[45]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  Cell-Autonomous Expression of Barley Mla1 Confers Race-Specific Resistance to the Powdery Mildew Fungus via a Rar1-Independent Signaling Pathway , 2001, Plant Cell.

[46]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[47]  R. Wise Disease Resistance: What's Brewing in Barley Genomics. , 2000, Plant disease.

[48]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  Closing the ranks to attack by powdery mildew. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[49]  L. Mao,et al.  The Mla (powdery mildew) resistance cluster is associated with three NBS-LRR gene families and suppressed recombination within a 240-kb DNA interval on chromosome 5S (1HS) of barley. , 1999, Genetics.

[50]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  A Novel Class of Eukaryotic Zinc-Binding Proteins Is Required for Disease Resistance Signaling in Barley and Development in C. elegans , 1999, Cell.

[51]  R. Kuehl Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis , 1999 .

[52]  C. Janeway,et al.  An ancient system of host defense. , 1998, Current opinion in immunology.

[53]  J. H. Jørgensen,et al.  Effect of three suppressors on the expression of powdery mildew resistance genes in barley. , 1996, Genome.

[54]  R. Locksley,et al.  The Instructive Role of Innate Immunity in the Acquired Immune Response , 1996, Science.

[55]  W. Bushnell,et al.  Inhibiting phenylalanine ammonia lyase and cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase suppresses Mla1 (HR) but not mlo5 (non-HR) barley powdery mildew resistances , 1995 .

[56]  James K. M. Brown,et al.  The effects of allelic variation at the Mla resistance locus in barley on the early development of Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei and host responses , 1995 .

[57]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  Nar-1 and Nar-2, Two Loci Required for Mla12-Specified Race-Specific Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Barley. , 1994, The Plant cell.

[58]  Tetsuji Yamada,et al.  Suppressors: Determinants of Specificity Produced by Plant Pathogens , 1994 .

[59]  Martin Wolfe,et al.  Genetics of Powdery Mildew Resistance in Barley , 1994 .

[60]  W. Bushnell,et al.  Host response gene transcript accumulation in relation to visible cytological events during Erysiphe graminis attack in isogenic barley lines differing at the Ml-a locus , 1993 .

[61]  J. Helms Jørgensen,et al.  Powdery Mildew Resistance Genes in 127 Northwest European Spring Barley Varieties , 1992 .

[62]  J. H. Jørgensen,et al.  Genetic analysis of barley mutants with modifications of powdery mildew resistance gene Ml-a12 , 1988 .

[63]  J. H. Jørgensen,et al.  Modification of barley powdery mildew resistance gene Ml-a12 by induced mutation , 1986 .

[64]  Y. Asada Plant Infection: The Physiological and Biochemical Basis , 1983 .

[65]  A. Ellingboe,et al.  Infection kinetics of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei on barley with different alleles at the Ml-a locus , 1983 .

[66]  H. Otani,et al.  Induced Resistance in Pear Leaves by Spore Germination Fluids of Nonpathogens to Alternaria alternata, Japanese Pear Pathotype and Suppression of the Induction by AK-toxin , 1982 .

[67]  M. C. Heath A Generalized Concept of Host-Parasite Specificity , 1981 .

[68]  W. Bushnell Suppressors of Defense Reactions: A Model for Roles in Specificity , 1981 .

[69]  A. Ellingboe Genetics and Physiology of Primary Infection by Erysiphe graminis , 1972 .