Data-driven estimation of the sensitivity of target-oriented time-lapse seismic imaging to source geometry

The goal of time-lapse imaging is to identify and characterize regions in which the earth’s material properties have changed between surveys. This requires an effective deployment of sources and receivers to monitor the region where changes are anticipated. Because each source adds to the acquisition cost, we should ensure that only those sources that best image the target are collected and used to form an image of the target region. This study presents a datadriven approach that estimates the sensitivity of target-oriented imaging to source geometry. The approach is based onthepropagation of the recordedbaseline seismic data backward in time through the entire medium and coupling it with the estimated perturbation in the subsurface. We test this approach using synthetic surface seismic and time-lapse VSP field-data from the SACROC field. These tests show that the useof the baseline seismic data enhances the robustness of the sensitivityestimatetoerrors, andcanbe used toselectdata that best image a target zone, thus increasing the signal-tonoise ratio of the image of the target region and reducing the cost of time-lapse acquisition, processing, and imaging.

[1]  Jeannot Trampert,et al.  Optimal nonlinear Bayesian experimental design: an application to amplitude versus offset experiments , 2003 .

[2]  Jürgen Hoffmann Illumination, resolution, and image quality of PP- and PS-waves for survey planning , 2001 .

[3]  O. K. Youn,et al.  Depth imaging with multiples , 2001 .

[4]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Optimal design of focused experiments and surveys , 1999 .

[5]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  Wave-equation-based seismic illumination analysis , 2006 .

[6]  Ian A. Watson,et al.  The construction of subsurface illumination and amplitude maps via ray tracing , 2000 .

[7]  Lianjie Huang,et al.  Time-lapse VSP data processing for monitoring CO2 injection , 2010 .

[8]  Michael Fehler,et al.  Carbon sequestration monitoring with acoustic double-difference waveform inversion: A case study on SACROC walkaway VSP data , 2011 .

[9]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[10]  Ru-Shan Wu,et al.  The perturbation method in elastic wave scattering , 1989 .

[11]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  On the implementation of perfectly matched layers in a three‐dimensional fourth‐order velocity‐stress finite difference scheme , 2003 .

[12]  Edip Baysal,et al.  Forward modeling by a Fourier method , 1982 .

[13]  Yue Wang,et al.  REVERSE-TIME MIGRATION , 1999 .

[14]  Xiao‐Bi Xie,et al.  A Full-wave Equation Based Seismic Illumination Analysis Method , 2008 .

[15]  Michael Prange,et al.  Guided Bayesian optimal experimental design , 2010 .

[16]  Lianjie Huang,et al.  Time-Lapse VSP Data Processing For Monitoring CO2 Injection , 2009 .

[17]  J. Carcione Staggered mesh for the anisotropic and viscoelastic wave equation , 1999 .

[19]  Huseyin Denli,et al.  Elastic-wave sensitivity propagation , 2010 .