Performance of Large Spacer Versus Nebulizer T-Piece in Single-Limb Noninvasive Ventilation

BACKGROUND: Predosing patients with COPD with salbutamol by using a pressurized metered-dose-inhaler (pMDI) as a bronchodilator was hypothesized to improve the distribution of the subsequent nebulized dose. This study determined the effect of a pMDI preliminary bronchodilator dose on the aerosol delivered by a mesh nebulizer during single-limb noninvasive ventilation. METHODS: Twelve subjects with COPD who received noninvasive ventilation were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, urinary pharmacokinetic study. A bi-level ventilator with a dry single-limb circuit and the fixed expiratory port was set in the spontaneous mode, with initial inspiratory and expiratory pressures of 20 and 5 cm H2O respectively, a 1:3 inspiratory-expiratory ratio, and 15 breaths/min. Salbutamol was administered via a mesh nebulizer with a large spacer or T-piece placed between the fixed-orifice expiratory valve and the oronasal mask. In vivo dosing methods were randomized for days 1, 3, and 5 of the study. On each day, a 1-mL respirable solution that contained 5,000 μg salbutamol was nebulized by using a mesh nebulizer with 3 setting: (1) T-piece, (2) large spacer, and (3) large spacer plus pMDI. Only with the large spacer plus pMDI setting, 2 pMDI doses, which contained 100 μg salbutamol each, were actuated before nebulization. Urine samples were collected at 0.5 h (as an index of pulmonary bioavailability) and pooled up to 24 h after dosing (as an index of systemic absorption). On day 2, ex vivo studies were performed for the 3 setting with salbutamol collected onto filters placed before the mask. The drug was eluted from the filters and analyzed to determine the inhaled dose. RESULTS: A large spacer plus pMDI showed a trend to deliver a higher fraction (percentage of nominal dose) of both ex vivo filters and 0.5-h urinary salbutamol. The 0.5-h urinary salbutamol excreted with a large spacer plus pMDI (1.99%) was larger than with the T-piece (1.73%) and large spacer (1.78%). This trend did not extend to the 24-h levels, in which bioavailability with the large spacer plus pMDI (49.9%) was lower than with the T-piece (52.8%) and with the large spacer (54.3%). However, no differences were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The T-piece and large spacer were equally efficient for salbutamol delivery from the mesh nebulizer in patients with COPD and on single-limb noninvasive ventilation. Adding a preliminary bronchodilator dose by pMDI prenebulization showed a trend toward greater pulmonary bioavailability of nebulized salbutamol and may be worth considering to maximize delivery of salbutamol to patients who are severely ill.

[1]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Effects of Fill Volume and Humidification on Aerosol Delivery During Single-Limb Noninvasive Ventilation , 2018, Respiratory Care.

[2]  Haitham Saeed,et al.  Modeling and optimization of nebulizers' performance in non-invasive ventilation using different fill volumes: Comparative study between vibrating mesh and jet nebulizers. , 2018, Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[3]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Effect of a Nebulizer Holding Chamber on Aerosol Delivery , 2018, Respiratory Care.

[4]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Lung deposition and systemic bioavailability of different aerosol devices with and without humidification in mechanically ventilated patients , 2017, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[5]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  In vitro/in vivo correlation and modeling of emitted dose and lung deposition of inhaled salbutamol from metered dose inhalers with different types of spacers in noninvasively ventilated patients , 2017, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[6]  H. Chrystyn,et al.  In vitro aerodynamic characteristics of aerosol delivered from different inhalation methods in mechanical ventilation , 2017, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[7]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Is Combihaler usable for aerosol delivery in single limb non-invasive mechanical ventilation? , 2017 .

[8]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Inhaled salbutamol dose delivered by jet nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizer and metered dose inhaler with spacer during invasive mechanical ventilation. , 2017, Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[9]  P. Dailey,et al.  Clinical outcome associated with the use of different inhalation method with and without humidification in asthmatic mechanically ventilated patients. , 2017, Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[10]  Arzu Ari,et al.  Efficiency of Different Aerosol Devices and Masks during Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in a Simulated Adult Lung Model , 2017 .

[11]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Fill volume, humidification and heat effects on aerosol delivery and fugitive emissions during noninvasive ventilation , 2017 .

[12]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Nebulizers and spacers for aerosol delivery through adult nasal cannula at low oxygen flow rate: An in-vitro study , 2017 .

[13]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Effect of Nebulizer Designs on Aerosol Delivery During Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Modeling Study of In Vitro Data , 2017, Pulmonary Therapy.

[14]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Modelling of in‐vitro and in‐vivo performance of aerosol emitted from different vibrating mesh nebulisers in non‐invasive ventilation circuit☆,☆☆ , 2017, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[15]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  In-vitro/in-vivo comparison of inhaled salbutamol dose delivered by jet nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizer and metered dose inhaler with spacer during non-invasive ventilation , 2017, Experimental lung research.

[16]  H. Salem,et al.  In-Vitro Characterization of the Aerosolized Dose During Non-Invasive Automatic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation , 2016, Pulmonary Therapy.

[17]  Arzu Ari,et al.  Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers Versus Nebulizers in the Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Subjects With Artificial Airways: An In Vitro Study , 2015, Respiratory Care.

[18]  D. Brandão,et al.  Radioaerosol Pulmonary Deposition Using Mesh and Jet Nebulizers During Noninvasive Ventilation in Healthy Subjects , 2015, Respiratory Care.

[19]  BoukhettalaNabile,et al.  In vitro performance of spacers for aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. , 2015 .

[20]  A. Pannatier,et al.  Physicochemical Aspects and Efficiency of Albuterol Nebulization: Comparison of Three Aerosol Types in an In Vitro Pediatric Model , 2015, Respiratory Care.

[21]  P. Diot,et al.  In vitro performance of spacers for aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. , 2015, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.

[22]  M. Naughton,et al.  Noninvasive ventilation in acute asthma. , 2014, Journal of critical care.

[23]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Modeling and Optimization of Terbutaline Emitted from a Dry Powder Inhaler and Influence on Systemic Bioavailability Using Data Mining Technology , 2014, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[24]  P. Diot,et al.  Study of the performances of a new spacer in adult mechanical ventilation , 2013 .

[25]  A. Berlinski,et al.  Albuterol Delivery by 4 Different Nebulizers Placed in 4 Different Positions in a Pediatric Ventilator In Vitro Model , 2013, Respiratory Care.

[26]  P. Diot,et al.  In vitro evaluation of a new spacer for pMDI and nebulizers in mechanical ventilation , 2012 .

[27]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim Aerodynamic characteristics of nebulized terbutaline sulphate using the Andersen Cascade Impactor compared to the Next Generation Impactor , 2011, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[28]  H. Chrystyn,et al.  In‐vitro characterisation of the nebulised dose during non‐invasive ventilation , 2010, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[29]  Mohamed E A Abdelrahim,et al.  Emitted dose and lung deposition of inhaled terbutaline from Turbuhaler at different conditions. , 2010, Respiratory medicine.

[30]  H. Chrystyn,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of nebulized terbutaline sulphate using the Next Generation Impactor (NGI) and CEN method. , 2009, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.

[31]  Hak-Kim Chan,et al.  In vitro/in vivo comparisons in pulmonary drug delivery. , 2008, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.

[32]  H. Chrystyn,et al.  Relative lung deposition of salbutamol following inhalation from a spacer and a Sidestream jet nebulizer following an acute exacerbation. , 2008, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[33]  G. Paintaud,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of high-dose nebulized amikacin in mechanically ventilated healthy subjects , 2008, Intensive Care Medicine.

[34]  M. Dolovich,et al.  Pulmonary drug delivery. Part I: physiological factors affecting therapeutic effectiveness of aerosolized medications. , 2003, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[35]  M. Parry-Billings,et al.  Discriminating measures of bronchodilator drug efficacy and potency. , 2001, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[36]  H. Chrystyn Methods to identify drug deposition in the lungs following inhalation. , 2001, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[37]  M. Tobin,et al.  Reconciling in vitro and in vivo measurements of aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation and defining efficiency-enhancing factors. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[38]  M. Tobin,et al.  Inhaled bronchodilator therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[39]  B. Lipworth,et al.  Effect of multiple actuations, delayed inhalation and antistatic treatment on the lung bioavailability of salbutamol via a spacer device. , 1996, Thorax.

[40]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  Effect of a spacer on pulmonary aerosol deposition from a jet nebuliser during mechanical ventilation. , 1995, Thorax.

[41]  H. Chrystyn,et al.  Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation. , 1992, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[42]  G. Smaldone,et al.  Quantitative deposition of aerosolized gentamicin in cystic fibrosis. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[43]  H. Wagner,et al.  The effect of bronchial obstruction on central airway deposition of a saline aerosol in patients with asthma. , 1986, The American review of respiratory disease.

[44]  H S Shannon,et al.  Effect of lung function and mode of inhalation on penetration of aerosol into the human lung. , 1977, Thorax.

[45]  S. Walker,et al.  The metabolism of salbutamol in man. , 1973, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[46]  R. Loddenkemper,et al.  Patterns of distribution and clearance of aerosols in patients with bronchiectasis. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.