Testing the Level of Agreement between Two Methodological Approaches of the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) for Occupational Health Practice—An Exemplary Application in the Field of Dentistry

Background: The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) is used for the risk assessment of workplace-related activities. Thus far, the paper and pen method (RULA-PP) has been predominantly used for this purpose. In the present study, this method was compared with an RULA evaluation based on kinematic data using inertial measurement units (RULA-IMU). The aim of this study was, on the one hand, to work out the differences between these two measurement methods and, on the other, to make recommendations for the future use of the respective method on the basis of the available findings. Methods: For this purpose, 130 (dentists + dental assistants, paired as teams) subjects from the dental profession were photographed in an initial situation of dental treatment and simultaneously recorded with the IMU system (Xsens). In order to compare both methods statistically, the median value of the difference of both methods, the weighted Cohen’s Kappa, and the agreement chart (mosaic plot) were applied. Results: In Arm and Wrist Analysis—area A—here were differences in risk scores; here, the median difference was 1, and the agreement in the weighted Cohen’s kappa test also remained between 0.07 and 0.16 (no agreement to poor agreement). In area B—Neck, Trunk, and Leg Analysis—the median difference was 0, with at least one poor agreement in the Cohen’s Kappa test of 0.23–0.39. The final score has a median of 0 and a Cohen’s Kappa value of 0.21–0.28. In the mosaic plot, it can be seen that RULA-IMU had a higher discriminatory power overall and more often reached a value of 7 than RULA-PP. Conclusion: The results indicate a systematic difference between the methods. Thus, in the RULA risk assessment, RULA-IMU is mostly one assessment point above RULA-PP. Therefore, future study results of RULA by RULA-IMU can be compared with literature results obtained by RULA-PP to further improve the risk assessment of musculoskeletal diseases.

[1]  D. Groneberg,et al.  Home office versus ergonomic workstation - is the ergonomic risk increased when working at the dining table? An inertial motion capture based pilot study , 2022, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[2]  D. Groneberg,et al.  Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons - RULA Applied to Objective Kinematic Data. , 2022, Human factors.

[3]  D. Groneberg,et al.  A RULA-Based Comparison of the Ergonomic Risk of Typical Working Procedures for Dentists and Dental Assistants of General Dentistry, Endodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Orthodontics , 2022, Sensors.

[4]  D. Kee Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  D. Groneberg,et al.  Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Dental Students—RULA Applied to Objective Kinematic Data , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  D. Groneberg,et al.  Ergonomic Comparison of Four Dental Workplace Concepts Using Inertial Motion Capture for Dentists and Dental Assistants , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  D. Groneberg,et al.  Combining Ergonomic Risk Assessment (RULA) with Inertial Motion Capture Technology in Dentistry—Using the Benefits from Two Worlds , 2021, Sensors.

[8]  F. Holzgreve,et al.  Intra- and inter-rater reliability of joint range of motion tests using tape measure, digital inclinometer and inertial motion capturing , 2020, PloS one.

[9]  D. Groneberg,et al.  SOPEZ: study for the optimization of ergonomics in the dental practice - musculoskeletal disorders in dentists and dental assistants: a study protocol , 2020, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology.

[10]  R. Heidarimoghadam,et al.  Neck and shoulder pain among elementary school students: prevalence and its risk factors , 2019, BMC Public Health.

[11]  Venerina Johnston,et al.  Are Measures of Postural Behavior Using Motion Sensors in Seated Office Workers Reliable? , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Tulin Gunduz,et al.  The effect of joint forces and torques on speed variation in automobile assembly lines. , 2018, Work.

[13]  Fariborz Mohammadipour,et al.  Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Iranian Office Workers: Prevalence and Risk Factors , 2018, Journal of medicine and life.

[14]  Sunisa Chaiklieng,et al.  Ergonomic risk assessment of smartphone users using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool , 2018, PloS one.

[15]  Franck Multon,et al.  Validation of an ergonomic assessment method using Kinect data in real workplace conditions. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  Gianpaolo Francesco Trotta,et al.  Real time RULA assessment using Kinect v2 sensor. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Jean-Claude Sagot,et al.  Physical risk factors identification based on body sensor network combined to videotaping. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Jose Antonio Diego-Mas,et al.  Errors Using Observational Methods for Ergonomics Assessment in Real Practice , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Carlo Alberto Avizzano,et al.  A novel wearable system for the online assessment of risk for biomechanical load in repetitive efforts , 2016 .

[20]  François Daniellou,et al.  Ergonomie , 2015, Conception et Production.

[21]  Rocio Poveda-Bautista,et al.  Influences on the use of observational methods by practitioners when identifying risk factors in physical work , 2015, Ergonomics.

[22]  Amit Gefen,et al.  Validity of the modified RULA for computer workers and reliability of one observation compared to six , 2014, Ergonomics.

[23]  Daria Battini,et al.  Innovative real-time system to integrate ergonomic evaluations into warehouse design and management , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[24]  Qingguo Li,et al.  Concurrent validation of Xsens MVN measurement of lower limb joint angular kinematics , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[25]  Gabriele Bleser,et al.  Innovative system for real-time ergonomic feedback in industrial manufacturing. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  Y. Roquelaure,et al.  Employment and occupational outcomes of workers with musculoskeletal pain in a French region , 2012, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[27]  Daniel Imbeau,et al.  Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders , 2012 .

[28]  Sara Dockrell,et al.  An investigation of the reliability of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) as a method of assessment of children's computing posture. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[29]  G. David Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. , 2005, Occupational medicine.

[30]  S E Mathiassen,et al.  Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[31]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[33]  B. Everitt,et al.  Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. , 1969 .