Acoustic identification of marine species using a feature library

Abstract Sonars and echosounders are widely used for remote sensing of life in the marine environment. There is an ongoing need to make the acoustic identification of marine species more correct and objective and thereby reduce the uncertainty of acoustic abundance estimates. In our work, data from multi-frequency echosounders working simultaneously with nearly identical and overlapping acoustic beams are processed stepwise in a modular sequence to improve data, detect schools and categorize acoustic targets by means of the Large Scale Survey System software (LSSS). Categorization is based on the use of an acoustic feature library whose main components are the relative frequency responses. The results of the categorization are translated into acoustic abundance of species. The method is tested on acoustic data from the Barents Sea, the Norwegian Sea and the North Sea, where the target species were capelin ( Mallotus villosus L.), Atlantic mackerel ( Scomber scombrus L.) and sandeel ( Ammodytes marinus L.), respectively. Manual categorization showed a high conformity with automatic categorization for all surveys, especially for schools.

[1]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  Autonomous underwater vehicles: future platforms for fisheries acoustics , 2003 .

[2]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  Proposals for the collection of multifrequency acoustic data , 2008 .

[3]  S. Georgakarakos,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools , 1996 .

[4]  Øyvind Fiksen,et al.  Piscivorous fish patrol krill swarms , 2005 .

[5]  Peter I. Miller,et al.  Assessing the potential of autonomous submarine gliders for ecosystem monitoring across multiple trophic levels (plankton to cetaceans) and pollutants in shallow shelf seas , 2014 .

[6]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  An introduction to morphological image processing , 1992 .

[7]  J. Jech,et al.  A multifrequency method to classify and evaluate fisheries acoustics data , 2006 .

[8]  E. Ona,et al.  An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data , 2002 .

[9]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics , 2002 .

[10]  David N. MacLennan,et al.  Fisheries and plankton acoustics: past, present, and future , 1996 .

[11]  Geir Odd Johansen,et al.  Acoustic species identification of schooling fish , 2009 .

[12]  E. John Simmonds,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[13]  Rolf J. Korneliussen,et al.  The acoustic identification of Atlantic mackerel , 2010 .

[14]  M. King Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management , 2007 .

[15]  John K. Horne,et al.  Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: a review , 2000 .

[16]  Egil Ona,et al.  Physiological factors causing natural variations in acoustic target strength of fish , 1990, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[17]  E. Ona,et al.  Synthetic echograms generated from the relative frequency response , 2003 .

[18]  G. S. Kleppel,et al.  Determination of zooplankton size and distribution with multifrequency acoustic technology , 1989 .

[19]  R. H. Myers,et al.  STAT 319 : Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists Term 152 ( 1 ) Final Exam Wednesday 11 / 05 / 2016 8 : 00 – 10 : 30 AM , 2016 .

[20]  Nils Olav Handegard,et al.  Observing individual fish behavior in fish aggregations: tracking in dense fish aggregations using a split-beam echosounder. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Rolf J. Korneliussen,et al.  Combining multibeam-sonar and multifrequency-echosounder data: examples of the analysis and imaging of large euphausiid schools , 2009 .

[22]  E. Ona,et al.  Size-dependent frequency response of sandeel schools , 2009 .

[23]  C. Clay,et al.  Average echoes from randomly oriented random‐length finite cylinders: Zooplankton models , 1993 .

[24]  Rudy J. Kloser,et al.  Species identification in deep water using multiple acoustic frequencies , 2002 .

[25]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[26]  Rolf J. Korneliussen,et al.  Measurement and removal of echo integration noise , 2000 .

[27]  D. Middleton,et al.  On the classification of underwater acoustic signals. II. Experimental applications involving fish , 1975 .

[28]  Alain Hillion,et al.  Narrowband acoustic identification of monospecific fish shoals , 1996 .

[29]  Rolf J. Korneliussen,et al.  The Bergen echo integrator post-processing system, with focus on recent improvements , 2004 .

[30]  Vassiliki H. Kourafalou,et al.  The SailBuoy remotely-controlled unmanned vessel: Measurements of near surface temperature, salinity and oxygen concentration in the Northern Gulf of Mexico , 2014 .

[31]  G. Pedersen,et al.  The relative frequency response derived from individually separated targets of northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua), saithe (Pollachius virens), and Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) , 2009 .

[32]  P. Wiebe,et al.  On acoustic estimates of zooplankton biomass , 1994 .

[33]  Alex De Robertis,et al.  Development and application of an empirical multifrequency method for backscatter classification , 2010 .