Case‐based Long‐term Professional Development of Science Teachers

Reform efforts are often unsuccessful because they failed to understand that teachers play a key role in making educational reforms successful. This paper describes a long‐term teacher professional development (PD) program aimed at educating and training teachers to teach interdisciplinary topics using case‐based method in science. The research objective was to identify, follow and document the processes that science teachers went through as they assimilated the interdisciplinary, case‐based science teaching approach. The research accompanied the PD program throughout its 3‐year period. About 50 teachers, who took part in the PD program, were exposed to an interdisciplinary case‐based teaching method. The research instruments included teacher portfolios, which contained projects and reflection questionnaires, classroom observations, teacher interviews, and student feedback questionnaires. The portfolios contained the projects that the teachers had carried out during the PD program, which included case studies and accompanying student activities. We found that the teachers gradually moved from exposure to new teaching methods and subject matter, through active learning and preparing case‐based team projects, to interdisciplinary, active classroom teaching using the case studies they developed.

[1]  Frances F. Fuller Concerns of Teachers: A Developmental Conceptualization1 , 1969 .

[2]  S. Arnott,et al.  Schools of thought , 1985, Nature.

[3]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  The Generative Learning Model and Its Implications for Science Education. , 1985 .

[4]  P. Burke,et al.  Career-long teacher education , 1985 .

[5]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[6]  The Use of Case Studies in the Science Classroom. , 1986 .

[7]  Rodger W. Bybee,et al.  Science education and the science-technology-society (S-T-S) theme , 1987 .

[8]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning , 1988 .

[9]  E. Glasersfeld Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position. , 1989 .

[10]  T. Guskey Attitude and perceptual change in teachers , 1989 .

[11]  Mike Summers,et al.  An Investigation of Some English Primary School Teachers’ Understanding of the Concepts Force and Gravity , 1990 .

[12]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Windows into Science Classrooms: Problems Associated with Higher-Level Cognitive Learning. , 1990 .

[13]  Gary Sykes,et al.  Teacher Education and the Case Idea , 1992 .

[14]  Gary Sykes,et al.  Chapter 10: Teacher Education and the Case Idea , 1992 .

[15]  Lya Kremer‐Hayon,et al.  Teacher professional development : a multiple perspective approach , 1993 .

[16]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning Project. , 1993 .

[17]  C. F. Herreid Case Studies in Science--A Novel Method of Science Education. , 1994 .

[18]  E. Soloway,et al.  A Collaborative Model for Helping Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[19]  C. F. Herreid Journal Articles as Case Studies--The New England Journal of Medicine on Breast Cancer. , 1994 .

[20]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[21]  P. Tamir,et al.  The Science/Technology/Society (STS) Curriculum Viewed through a State Model. , 1995 .

[22]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[23]  Piet Lijnse,et al.  Teacher Development: A Model From Science Education , 1996 .

[24]  P. Challen,et al.  Case Studies as a Basis for Discussion Method Teaching in Introductory Chemistry Courses , 1996 .

[25]  Steven Hodas,et al.  Technology Refusal and the Organizational Culture of Schools , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[26]  F. Adler A Case , 1863, The Lancet.

[27]  Charles R. Coble,et al.  Teachers Designing Curriculum as Professional Development: A Model for Transformational Science Teaching. , 1997 .

[28]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Learning to teach primary science through problem-based learning , 1998 .

[29]  Reuven Lazarowitz,et al.  Cooperative Learning in the Science Curriculum , 1998 .

[30]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Conceptual Change in Science and in the Learning of Science , 1998 .

[31]  B. Bell Teacher Development in Science Education , 1998 .

[32]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  The Subject Matter Knowledge of Preservice Science Teachers , 1998 .

[33]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Technology's promises and dangers in a psychological and educational context , 1998 .

[34]  D. Treagust,et al.  Learning in Science — From Behaviourism Towards Social Constructivism and Beyond , 1998 .

[35]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[36]  Rodger W. Bybee,et al.  Science Curriculum: Transforming Goals to Practices , 1998 .

[37]  Y. Dori,et al.  Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study , 1999 .

[38]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Student Perceptions of Industrial Chemistry Classroom Learning Environments , 1999 .

[39]  Kenneth M. Zeichner,et al.  Educating prospective teachers of biology : Findings, limitations, and recommendations , 1999 .

[40]  S. Loucks-Horsley,et al.  Research on Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics and Science: The State of the Scene , 1999 .

[41]  J. Elliott Editorial. Introduction: Global and Local Dimensions of Reforms in Teacher Education. , 1999 .

[42]  Judith B. Harris,et al.  Correlates with Use of Telecomputing Tools: K-12 Teachers' Beliefs and Demographics , 1999 .

[43]  D. Tippins,et al.  Cases in Middle and Secondary Science Education: The Promise and Dilemmas , 1999 .

[44]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness , 2000 .

[45]  David Gibson,et al.  New Insights on Technology Adoption in Schools , 2000 .

[46]  Revital T. Tal,et al.  A project-based alternative assessment system , 2000 .

[47]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[48]  Shoshana Keiny,et al.  Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum devleopment - the STEMS project approach , 2001 .

[49]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge , 2001 .

[50]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Factors influencing the use of computer mediated communication by teachers in secondary schools , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[51]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Invited reaction: Cultivating problem‐solving skills through problem‐based approaches to professional development , 2002 .

[52]  Margaret C. Lohman Cultivating problem-solving skills through problem-based approaches to professional development , 2002 .

[53]  Yehuda Peled,et al.  Characteristics of Science Teachers Who Incorporate Web-Based Teaching , 2002 .

[54]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  From Nationwide Standardized Testing to School-Based Alternative Embedded Assessment in Israel: Students' Performance in the Matriculation 2000 Project , 2003 .

[55]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Teaching biotechnology through case studies - can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? , 2003 .

[56]  A. Zohar,et al.  Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? , 2003 .