Deep-Learning-based Fast and Accurate 3D CT Deformable Image Registration in Lung Cancer

Background: Deformable Image Registration (DIR) is an essential technique required in many applications of radiation oncology. However, conventional DIR approaches typically take several minutes to register one pair of 3D CT images and the resulting deformable vector fields (DVFs) are only specific to the pair of images used, making it less appealing for clinical application. Purpose: In some proton therapy facilities, patient alignment relies on two 2D orthogonal kV images, taken at fixed, oblique angles, as no 3D on-the-bed imaging is available. The visibility of the tumor in kV images is limited since the patient’s 3D anatomy is projected onto a 2D plane, especially when the tumor is behind high-density structures such as bones. This can lead to large patient setup errors. A solution is to reconstruct the 3D CT image from the kV images obtained at the treatment isocenter in the treatment position. Methods: An asymmetric autoencoder-like network built with vision-transformer blocks was developed. The data was collected from 1 head and neck patient: 2 orthogonal kV images (1024×1024 voxels), 1 3D CT with padding (512×512×512) acquired from the in-room CT-on-rails before kVs were taken and 2 digitally-reconstructed-radiograph (DRR) images (512×512) based on the CT. We resampled kV images every 8 voxels and DRR and CT every 4 voxels, thus formed a dataset consisting of 262,144 samples, in which the images have a dimension of 128 for each direction. In training, both kV and DRR images were utilized, and the encoder was encouraged to learn the jointed feature map from both kV and DRR images. In testing, only independent kV images were used. The full-size synthetic CT (sCT) was achieved by concatenating the sCTs generated by the model according to their spatial information. The image quality of the synthetic CT (sCT) was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and per-voxel-absolute-CT-number-difference volume histogram (CDVH). Results: The model achieved a speed of 2.1s and a MAE of <40HU. The CDVH showed that <5% of the voxels had a per-voxel-absolute-CT-number-difference larger than 185 HU. Conclusion: A patient-specific vision-transformer-based network was developed and shown to be accurate and efficient to reconstruct 3D CT images from kV images.

[1]  Seung Yeon Shin,et al.  Body location embedded 3D U-Net (BLE-U-Net) for ovarian cancer ascites segmentation on CT scans , 2023, Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis.

[2]  Sean S. Park,et al.  Cardiopulmonary Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2022, Clinical lung cancer.

[3]  S. Schild,et al.  Empirical Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) for Mandible Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Pencil-Beam-Scanning Proton Therapy (PBSPT): A Retrospective, Case-Matched Cohort Study , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[4]  Ross B. Girshick,et al.  Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners , 2021, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[5]  T. Sio,et al.  Technical Note: 4D robust optimization in small spot intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for distal esophageal carcinoma. , 2021, Medical physics.

[6]  C. Hallemeier,et al.  Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Clinical Experience , 2021, Advances in radiation oncology.

[7]  T. Sio,et al.  Beam angle comparison for distal esophageal carcinoma patients treated with intensity‐modulated proton therapy , 2020, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[8]  C. Hallemeier,et al.  Acute Toxicities and Short-Term Patient Outcomes After Intensity-Modulated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Mayo Clinic Experience , 2020, Advances in radiation oncology.

[9]  C. Hallemeier,et al.  Managing treatment-related uncertainties in proton beam radiotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers. , 2020, Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[10]  S. Schild,et al.  Robust Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy to Redistribute High Linear Energy Transfer (LET) from Nearby Critical Organs to Tumors in Head and Neck Cancer. , 2020, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  T. Sio,et al.  Technical Note: Treatment Planning System (TPS) Approximations Matter ─ Comparing Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Plan Quality and Robustness between a Commercial and an In-house Developed TPS for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). , 2019, Medical physics.

[12]  T. Sio,et al.  Early Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The Mayo Clinic Experience , 2019, Advances in radiation oncology.

[13]  Yue Dong,et al.  Recursive Cascaded Networks for Unsupervised Medical Image Registration , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[14]  T. Sio,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small‐spot intensity‐modulated proton versus volumetric‐modulated arc therapies , 2019, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  Wei Liu,et al.  A novel and individualized robust optimization method using normalized dose interval volume constraints (NDIVC) for intensity‐modulated proton radiotherapy , 2018, Medical physics.

[16]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust radiotherapy planning , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  T. Sio,et al.  Small‐spot intensity‐modulated proton therapy and volumetric‐modulated arc therapies for patients with locally advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A dosimetric comparative study , 2018, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[18]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A deep learning framework for unsupervised affine and deformable image registration , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  VoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registration , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Dietmar Georg,et al.  Adaptive radiation therapy. , 2018, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[21]  Wei Liu,et al.  Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Ping Xia,et al.  Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement‐based verification QA , 2018, Medical physics.

[23]  E W Korevaar,et al.  An automated, quantitative, and case-specific evaluation of deformable image registration in computed tomography images , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust intensity‐modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk , 2017, Medical physics.

[25]  Siyong Kim,et al.  Deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2017, Radiation oncology journal.

[26]  S. Schild,et al.  Exploratory study of the association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan robustness with local failure in head and neck cancer , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[27]  Marc Niethammer,et al.  Quicksilver: Fast predictive image registration – A deep learning approach , 2017, NeuroImage.

[28]  Wei Liu,et al.  Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for “worst case dose” and “minmax” robust optimization of intensity‐modulated proton therapy dose distributions , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[29]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robustness quantification methods comparison in volumetric modulated arc therapy to treat head and neck cancer. , 2016, Practical radiation oncology.

[30]  Wei Liu,et al.  Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  R. Mohan,et al.  Perturbation of water‐equivalent thickness as a surrogate for respiratory motion in proton therapy , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[32]  Ke Sheng,et al.  Near Real-Time Assessment of Anatomic and Dosimetric Variations for Head and Neck Radiation Therapy via Graphics Processing Unit-based Dose Deformation Framework. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[34]  Wei Liu,et al.  Impact of respiratory motion on worst-case scenario optimized intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancers. , 2015, Practical radiation oncology.

[35]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Deformable image registration for adaptive radiation therapy of head and neck cancer: accuracy and precision in the presence of tumor changes. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  J. Ashman,et al.  Proton beam therapy for locally advanced lung cancer: A review. , 2014, World journal of clinical oncology.

[37]  Nancy A. Obuchowski,et al.  Iterative metal artifact reduction: Evaluation and optimization of technique , 2014, Skeletal Radiology.

[38]  R. Mohan,et al.  Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[39]  Young-Bin Cho,et al.  A novel method to quantify and compare anatomical shape: application in cervix cancer radiotherapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  J. Gee,et al.  The Insight ToolKit image registration framework , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[41]  Wei Liu,et al.  An Automatic Approach for Satisfying Dose-Volume Constraints in Linear Fluence Map Optimization for IMPT. , 2014, Journal of cancer therapy.

[42]  R. Mohan,et al.  Effects of respiratory motion on passively scattered proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon therapy for stage III lung cancer: are proton plans more sensitive to breathing motion? , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. , 2013, Medical physics.

[44]  Steven J Frank,et al.  PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization. , 2013, Medical physics.

[45]  S. Hahn,et al.  Proton therapy for head and neck cancer: current applications and future directions , 2012 .

[46]  J. Siebers,et al.  Dose deformation-invariance in adaptive prostate radiation therapy: implication for treatment simulations. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[47]  Sebastian Schafer,et al.  Extra-dimensional Demons: a method for incorporating missing tissue in deformable image registration. , 2012, Medical physics.

[48]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  A finite element method to correct deformable image registration errors in low-contrast regions , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  Wei Liu,et al.  Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques. , 2012, Medical physics.

[50]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[51]  Wei Chen,et al.  Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[52]  A. Lee,et al.  The superiority of hybrid-volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique over double arcs VMAT and 3D-conformal technique in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer--a planning study. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[53]  Martin J Murphy,et al.  Optimized knot placement for B-splines in deformable image registration. , 2011, Medical physics.

[54]  Maria Thor,et al.  Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[55]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  A contour-guided deformable image registration algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[56]  Wei Liu,et al.  TH‐C‐BRB‐01: Toward a thorough Evaluation of IMPT Plan Sensitivity to Uncertainties: Revisit the Worst‐Case Analysis with An Exhaustively Sampling Approach , 2011 .

[57]  Michael Velec,et al.  Effect of breathing motion on radiotherapy dose accumulation in the abdomen using deformable registration. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[58]  Anders Forsgren,et al.  Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy. , 2011, Medical physics.

[59]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  The potential benefit of radiotherapy with protons in head and neck cancer with respect to normal tissue sparing: a systematic review of literature. , 2011, The oncologist.

[60]  L Bondar,et al.  A population-based model to describe geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy: applied to prostate cases , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[61]  Suresh Senan,et al.  Stereotactic radiotherapy for peripheral lung tumors: a comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with 3 other delivery techniques. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[62]  Martha M Matuszak,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of hypofractionated stereotactic lung radiotherapy: A dosimetric and treatment efficiency analysis. , 2010, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[63]  K. Brock,et al.  Adapting liver motion models using a navigator channel technique. , 2009, Medical physics.

[64]  Thomas Bortfeld,et al.  Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning. , 2008, Medical physics.

[65]  U Oelfke,et al.  Worst case optimization: a method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[66]  A J Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: the potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[67]  A. Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[68]  Eduard Schreibmann,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of a cone‐beam computed tomography–planning computed tomography deformable image registration method for adaptive radiation therapy , 2007, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[69]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Non-parametric Diffeomorphic Image Registration with the Demons Algorithm , 2007, MICCAI.

[70]  Peter A Balter,et al.  Reduction of normal lung irradiation in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients, using ventilation images for functional avoidance. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[71]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Automatic Contour Propagation in Cine Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[72]  M. Alber,et al.  Modelling individual geometric variation based on dominant eigenmodes of organ deformation: implementation and evaluation , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[73]  Thomas Guerrero,et al.  Quantification of regional ventilation from treatment planning CT. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[74]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[75]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[76]  G S Bauman,et al.  Tracking the dose distribution in radiation therapy by accounting for variable anatomy , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[77]  D. Yan,et al.  A model to accumulate fractionated dose in a deforming organ. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[78]  J Wong,et al.  Adaptive modification of treatment planning to minimize the deleterious effects of treatment setup errors. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[79]  J. Nocedal Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices With Limited Storage , 1980 .

[80]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[81]  Seung Yeon Shin,et al.  Improved Multi-modal Patch Based Lymphoma Segmentation with Negative Sample Augmentation and Label Guidance on PET/CT Scans , 2022, MMMI@MICCAI.

[82]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint , 2018, Medical physics.

[83]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity‐modulated proton therapy , 2017, Medical physics.

[84]  J. Galvin,et al.  Impact of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Technique for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the NRG Oncology RTOG 0617 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[85]  N. Paragios,et al.  [Adaptive radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer]. , 2015, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[86]  Andrew L. Maas Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models , 2013 .

[87]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Impact of four-dimensional computed tomography pulmonary ventilation imaging-based functional avoidance for lung cancer radiotherapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[88]  J. F. De Los Santos,et al.  Automatic segmentation of whole breast using atlas approach and deformable image registration , 2009 .

[89]  Gudrun Goitein,et al.  The clinical potential of intensity modulated proton therapy. , 2004, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[90]  M W Vannier,et al.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[91]  T. Sørensen,et al.  A method of establishing group of equal amplitude in plant sociobiology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons , 1948 .