Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Interventional Cardiology

Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) has had a major impact in the field of interventional cardiology. Due to its superior accuracy objectivity and improved interobserver and intraobserver variability it has supplanted visual and hand-held caliper assessments of coronary arteriograms [1–3]. QCA is now the gold standard for assessing the coronary tree in the context of scientific research. It has not yet gained widespread appeal for routine clinical use because of expense and time constraints. To date there are two different techniques for measuring quantitative angiographic stenosis. One is based on the detection of luminal borders from orthogonal images to create a three-dimensional approximation of the diseased vessel, and the other uses videodensitometry of the stenosis to extract three-dimensional information from a single angiographic view. Although the latter approach has particular advantages, we favor the edge detection method because it provides absolute measurements that are relatively insensitive to the image quality.

[1]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[2]  N. Kleiman,et al.  Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. , 1990, American heart journal.

[3]  M. Keijzer,et al.  Some Laser‐Tissue Interactions in 308 nm Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty , 1990 .

[4]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Bimodal distribution of diameter stenosis 4 to 12 months after angioplasty: Implications for definitions and interpretation of restenosis , 1991 .

[5]  D. Baim,et al.  Insights into the mechanism of luminal improvement after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  P. Serruys,et al.  Additional improvement of stenosis geometry in human coronary arteries by stenting after balloon dilatation. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  J. Beranek Stenting of coronary arteries. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  J. Reiber,et al.  Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? , 1987, Circulation.

[9]  P. Serruys,et al.  Stenting of coronary arteries: has a modern Pandora's box been opened? , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  J. Reiber,et al.  Edge detection versus densitometry for assessing coronary stenting quantitatively. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical, histologic and quantitative angiographic predictors of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy: a multivariate analysis of the renarrowing process and late outcome. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  K. Bailey,et al.  Effect of external beam irradiation on neointimal hyperplasia after experimental coronary artery injury. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Angiographic risk factors of luminal narrowing after coronary balloon angioplasty using balloon measurements to reflect stretch and elastic recoil at the dilation site. The CARPORT Study Group. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  H. Saner,et al.  The disease-free wall in coronary atherosclerosis: its relation to degree of obstruction. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantitative angiographic assessment of elastic recoil after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  K. Gould,et al.  Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  P. Serruys,et al.  Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty With Thromboxane A2‐Receptor Blockade: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial , 1991, Circulation.

[19]  H J ten Katen,et al.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  P. Serruys,et al.  Methodological problems related to the quantitative assessment of stretch, elastic recoil, and balloon-artery ratio. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[21]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Coronary Artery Dimensions from Cineangiograms-Methodology and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Analysis Procedure , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  P. Serruys,et al.  The mechanism of directional coronary atherectomy. , 1993, European heart journal.

[23]  P W Serruys,et al.  Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. , 1988, Circulation.

[24]  R D Safian,et al.  The Importance of Acute Luminal Diameter in Determining Restenosis After Coronary Atherectomy or Stenting , 1992, Circulation.

[25]  C. J. Slager,et al.  Quantitative Coronary and Left Ventricular Cineangiography: Methodology and Clinical Applications , 1986 .

[26]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Does the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril prevent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty? Results of the MERCATOR study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Multicenter European Research Trial with Cilazapril after Angiopla , 1992, Circulation.

[27]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantitative angiography after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, British heart journal.

[28]  G. B. John Mancini,et al.  Digital coronary angiography: advantages and limitations , 1991 .

[29]  P. Serruys,et al.  Experiences of a quantitative coronary angiographic core laboratory in restenosis prevention trials , 1993 .

[30]  P. Serruys,et al.  Comparative quantitative angiographic analysis of directional coronary atherectomy and balloon coronary angioplasty. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  P. Serruys,et al.  Calibration using angiographic catheters as scaling devices--importance of filming the catheters not filled with contrast medium. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantitative angiographic follow-up of the coronary Wallstent in native vessels and bypass grafts (European experience--March 1986 to March 1990). , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  F. Klocke,et al.  Measurements of coronary blood flow and degree of stenosis: current clinical implications and continuing uncertainties. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  J. Edwards,et al.  Pathology of coronary atherosclerosis. , 1971, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[35]  J. Reiber,et al.  Do stents interfere with the densitometric assessment of a coronary artery lesion? , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[36]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Change in diameter of coronary artery segments adjacent to stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: failure of percent diameter stenosis measurement to reflect morphologic changes induced by balloon dilation. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  P. Serruys,et al.  Edge detection versus videodensitometry for quantitative angiographic assessment of directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[38]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: pathologic observations in 20 patients. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  G. Mancini,et al.  Quantitative coronary arteriographic methods in the interventional catheterization laboratory: an update and perspective. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  P. Serruys,et al.  Regional differences in elastic recoil after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a quantitative angiographic study. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  K. Gould,et al.  Identifying and Measuring Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis: Quantitative Coronary Arteriography and Positron Emission Tomography , 1988, Circulation.

[42]  B Meier,et al.  Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary-artery stent. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Quantitative coronary arteriography: equipment and technical requirements , 1993 .

[44]  P. Serruys,et al.  Morphologic change in coronary artery stenosis with the Medtronic Wiktor stent: initial results from the core laboratory for quantitative angiography. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[45]  P. Serruys,et al.  Comparative angiographic quantitative analysis of the immediate efficacy of coronary atherectomy with balloon angioplasty, stenting, and rotational ablation. , 1991, American heart journal.

[46]  P. Serruys,et al.  Early and late assessment of stenosis geometry after coronary arterial stenting. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[47]  W. Edwards,et al.  Restenosis after balloon angioplasty. A practical proliferative model in porcine coronary arteries. , 1990, Circulation.

[48]  D. Baim,et al.  Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devices. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  S. Kalbfleisch,et al.  Automated quantitation of indexes of coronary lesion complexity. Comparison between patients with stable and unstable angina. , 1990, Circulation.

[50]  P. Serruys,et al.  Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy and balloon angioplasty: comparative analysis based on matched lesions. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  R. Dinsmore,et al.  Interobserver Variability in Coronary Angiography , 1976, Circulation.

[52]  T. Ryan,et al.  The mechanism of transluminal angioplasty: evidence for formation of aneurysms in experimental atherosclerosis. , 1983, Circulation.

[53]  Jan J. Gerbrands,et al.  Computerized Quantitative Coronary Angiography Applied to Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty: Advantages and Limitations , 1982 .

[54]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. III. Clinical trial. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[55]  P. Serruys,et al.  Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty follows a near gaussian distribution: a quantitative angiographic study in 1,445 successfully dilated lesions. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.