A comparative analysis of structural graph metrics to identify anomalies in online social networks

The paper presents a comparative study covering both theoretical as well as experimental evaluation of different graph metrics to identify anomalous nodes in online social networks.The analysis of a specific graph metric, called Brokerage is carried out to examine its effectiveness for detecting anomalous nodes.The statistical and graphical analysis of the anomalous nodes is presented.The comparative analysis of rankings given by different measures is investigated.Experiments are performed using four diverse data sets each belonging to somewhat different domain, which helps to analyze the effectiveness of metrics in different domains. Social networks are becoming vulnerable to a number of fraudulent attacks and mischievous activities due to their widespread use and increasing popularity. So, detection of anomalous activities, especially in social networks, is essentially required as it helps to identify important and significant information regarding the behavior of anomalous users. In order to detect anomalies in social networks, researchers have mainly relied on the use of behavior and structure based approaches. Working in the similar direction, we extend the graph structure based approach by introducing and analyzing important graph metrics to detect anomalous activities. The comparison and effectiveness of measures have been presented on the basis of statistical measures like precision, recall and F-score, as well as on the basis of calculated anomalous scores. Theoretical and empirical evaluation reveals that the relationship between brokerage and number of edges helps to detect and correctly rank maximum number of anomalies. Display Omitted

[1]  Scott Counts,et al.  Identifying topical authorities in microblogs , 2011, WSDM '11.

[2]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks , 2010, WWW '10.

[3]  Sarbjeet Singh,et al.  Detecting anomalies in Online Social Networks using graph metrics , 2015, 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON).

[4]  Lawrence B. Holder,et al.  Anomaly detection in data represented as graphs , 2007, Intell. Data Anal..

[5]  Patrick J. Wolfe,et al.  A Spectral Framework for Anomalous Subgraph Detection , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  David D. Jensen,et al.  The case for anomalous link discovery , 2005, SKDD.

[7]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Towards Detecting Anomalous User Behavior in Online Social Networks , 2014, USENIX Security Symposium.

[8]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Using Friendship Ties and Family Circles for Link Prediction , 2008, SNAKDD.

[9]  Sarbjeet Singh,et al.  An Approach for Determining Trustworthiness of Individuals in a Web-Based Social Network , 2016 .

[10]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  It's who you know: graph mining using recursive structural features , 2011, KDD.

[11]  Franck Legendre,et al.  Social Trust in Opportunistic Networks , 2010, 2010 INFOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops.

[12]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  oddball: Spotting Anomalies in Weighted Graphs , 2010, PAKDD.

[13]  Xiuzhen Zhang,et al.  Anomaly detection in online social networks , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[14]  Jiangtao Cui,et al.  Affinity-driven blog cascade analysis and prediction , 2013, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[15]  Rui Ma,et al.  OOLAM: an opinion oriented link analysis model for influence persona discovery , 2011, WSDM '11.

[16]  Guowei Shen,et al.  Anomaly Detection in Microblogging via Co-Clustering , 2015, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[17]  Richi Nayak,et al.  Analyzing the Effectiveness of Graph Metrics for Anomaly Detection in Online Social Networks , 2012, WISE.

[18]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Identifying the influential bloggers in a community , 2008, WSDM '08.

[19]  Nima Jafari Navimipour,et al.  Opinion leaders selection in the social networks based on trust relationships propagation , 2016 .

[20]  Trust Promotes Unethical Behavior , 2015 .

[21]  Sourav S. Bhowmick,et al.  Blog cascade affinity: analysis and prediction , 2009, CIKM.

[22]  Xiaowei Ying,et al.  Spectrum based fraud detection in social networks , 2011, ICDE.

[23]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Extended structures of mediation: Re-examining brokerage in dynamic networks , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[24]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  LOF: identifying density-based local outliers , 2000, SIGMOD 2000.

[25]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks , 1989 .

[26]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[27]  Zarinah Mohd Kasirun,et al.  Anomaly detection in Online Social Networks using structure-based technique , 2013, 8th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST-2013).

[28]  Danai Koutra,et al.  Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey , 2014, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[29]  Barbara Carminati,et al.  Content-Based Filtering in On-Line Social Networks , 2010, PSDML.