Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

We present a large exploratory study (N = 15,001) investigating the relationship between cognitive reflection and political affiliation, ideology, and voting in the 2016 Presidential Election. We find that Trump voters are less reflective than Clinton voters or third-party voters. However, much (although not all) of this difference was driven by Democrats who chose Trump. Among Republicans, conversely, Clinton and Trump voters were similar, whereas third-party voters were more reflective. Furthermore, although Democrats/liberals were somewhat more reflective than Republicans/conservatives overall, political moderates and nonvoters were least reflective, whereas libertarians were most reflective. Thus, beyond the previously theorized correlation between analytic thinking and liberalism, these data suggest three additional consequences of reflectiveness (or lack thereof) for political cognition: (a) facilitating political apathy versus engagement, (b) supporting the adoption of orthodoxy versus heterodoxy, and (c) drawing individuals toward candidates who share their cognitive style and toward policy proposals that are intuitively compelling.

[1]  S. Sloman,et al.  Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. , 2007, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[2]  David G. Rand,et al.  Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Justin F. Landy,et al.  Are Thoughtful People More Utilitarian? CRT as a Unique Predictor of Moral Minimalism in the Dilemmatic Context , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .

[5]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[6]  David G. Rand.  Cooperation, Fast and Slow , 2016, Psychological science.

[7]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Personalized Persuasion , 2012, Psychological science.

[8]  David G. Rand,et al.  Cyclical Population Dynamics of Automatic Versus Controlled Processing: An Evolutionary Pendulum , 2017, Psychological review.

[9]  S. Handley,et al.  The parallel processing model of belief bias: review and extensions , 2017 .

[10]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[11]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[13]  David G. Rand,et al.  Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Jesse Graham,et al.  Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  A. Van Hiel,et al.  The Association of Cognitive Ability with Right–Wing Ideological Attitudes and Prejudice: A Meta–Analytic Review , 2015 .

[16]  A. Coppock.  Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk: A Replication Approach , 2018, Political Science Research and Methods.

[17]  C. Crandall,et al.  Low-Effort Thought Promotes Political Conservatism , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  J. Greenberg,et al.  A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: an extension of terror management theory. , 1999, Psychological review.

[19]  A. Mastrogiorgio.  Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[20]  J. Jost,et al.  Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit? , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[21]  Shigehiro Oishi,et al.  Liberals Think More Analytically (More “WEIRD”) Than Conservatives , 2015, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  David G. Rand,et al.  Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. , 2020, Journal of personality.

[23]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks , 2012 .

[24]  Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government , 2017, Behavioural Public Policy.

[25]  Will M. Gervais.  Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution , 2015, Cognition.

[26]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin , 2004 .

[27]  E. Peters,et al.  Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[28]  Gordon Hodson,et al.  Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes , 2012, Psychological science.

[29]  Gordon Pennycook,et al.  The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures , 2018, Behavior research methods.

[30]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[31]  David G. Rand,et al.  Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , 2019, Cognition.

[32]  R. Lau,et al.  Political sophistication and political deviance: a matter of context , 1989 .

[33]  David G. Rand,et al.  Turking Overtime: How Participant Characteristics and Behavior Vary Over Time and Day on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2017 .

[34]  S. Frederick.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[35]  K. Stanovich.  Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? , 2008 .

[36]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking , 2015 .

[37]  B. Silver,et al.  Measurement and Mismeasurement of the Validity of the Self-reported Vote* , 1986 .

[38]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  The exception or the rule: Using words to assess analytic thinking, Donald Trump, and the American presidency. , 2017 .

[39]  Onurcan Yilmaz,et al.  Analytic cognitive style and cognitive ability differentially predict religiosity and social conservatism , 2017 .

[40]  Onurcan Yilmaz,et al.  Analytic Thought Training Promotes Liberalism on Contextualized (But Not Stable) Political Opinions , 2017 .

[41]  Kevin B Smith,et al.  Disgust, politics, and responses to threat , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  Guillermo Campitelli,et al.  Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[43]  Paulo Sousa,et al.  Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking , 2014 .

[44]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2005 .

[45]  David G. Rand,et al.  Cognitive Reflection is a Stable Trait , 2018 .

[46]  K. Stanovich.  On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. , 2012 .

[47]  David G. Rand,et al.  Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  D. Murphey,et al.  The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion , 2013 .

[49]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[50]  Onurcan Yilmaz,et al.  Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations , 2017, Cognition.

[51]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief , 2012, Cognition.

[52]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[53]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Approach to Searching and Stopping in Multi-Attribute Judgment , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[54]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[55]  Onurcan Yilmaz,et al.  The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used , 2017, Judgment and Decision Making.

[56]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment , 2022 .

[57]  John T. Jost,et al.  Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology , 2017 .

[58]  David G. Rand,et al.  The relationship between intertemporal choice and following the path of least resistance across choices, preferences, and beliefs , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[59]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  P. Klaczynski.  Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision-making. , 2001, Child development.

[61]  Thomas J. Leeper,et al.  The Generalizability of Survey Experiments* , 2015, Journal of Experimental Political Science.

[62]  Philip D. Waggoner,et al.  Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? , 2015 .

[63]  David G. Rand,et al.  Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Bullshit Receptivity, Overclaiming, Familiarity, and Analytic Thinking , 2017, Journal of personality.

[64]  Gilles E. Gignac,et al.  Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers , 2016 .

[65]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition? , 2016, Behavior research methods.

[66]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Explaining Donald Trump via communication style: Grandiosity, informality, and dynamism , 2017 .

[67]  Christopher C. French,et al.  Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[68]  C. Beevers.  Cognitive vulnerability to depression: a dual process model. , 2005, Clinical psychology review.

[69]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test , 2014 .

[70]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Individual Differences in Intuitive-Exp eriential and Analytical-Rational Thinking Styles , 1996 .

[71]  Onurcan Yilmaz,et al.  An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: A non-western replication and extension , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[72]  Volker Stocké,et al.  Political Involvement and Memory Failure as Interdependent Determinants of Vote Overreporting , 2007 .

[73]  Gordon Pennycook,et al.  A Perspective on the Theoretical Foundation of Dual Process Models , 2017 .

[74]  David G. Rand,et al.  Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[76]  P. Ditto,et al.  At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[77]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[78]  S. Epstein,et al.  Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[80]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.

[81]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[82]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[83]  Andrew Shtulman,et al.  Cognitive Reflection Predicts Science Understanding , 2014, CogSci.

[84]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Thinking Fast and Slow , 2017, SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluation Rev..

[85]  Matthijs van Veelen,et al.  A general evolutionary framework for the role of intuition and deliberation in cooperation , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[86]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[87]  Geoffrey P. Goodwin,et al.  Are good reasoners more incest-friendly? Trait cognitive reflection predicts selective moralization in a sample of American adults , 2014, Judgment and Decision Making.

[88]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A model of heuristic judgment , 2005 .

[89]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values , 2014 .

[90]  D. Kahan.  Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study , 2012 .

[91]  W. Rahn,et al.  Rise of the Trumpenvolk , 2016 .

[92]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[93]  Adam Seth Levine,et al.  Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity , 2014, Journal of Experimental Political Science.

[94]  A. Furnham,et al.  Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories , 2014, Cognition.

[95]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[96]  Gordon Pennycook,et al.  Going against the Herd: Psychological and Cultural Factors Underlying the ‘Vaccination Confidence Gap’ , 2015, PloS one.

[97]  S. Frederick,et al.  The non-effects of repeated exposure to the Cognitive Reflection Test , 2018, Judgment and Decision Making.

[98]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  Dual-process theories and cognitive development: Advances and challenges , 2011 .