Use of Traveler Information to Improve Texas Transportation Network Operations in the Context of Toll Roads

To repay bond debt for new toll roads, investors will depend on toll revenue, an uncertain source. Studies have found that traffic on toll roads is initially low, and grows slowly over time as motorists become aware of the time savings and other benefits of a toll road. Given this situation, this study was initiated by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to investigate the potential of using Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS) to enhance the operations of both tolled and non-tolled roads. Enhanced diversion of traffic to toll roads would have two benefits: increase toll road usage, and reduce congestion on non-tolled roads. Evaluation of the dual benefits is the primary objective and the essence of this study. The research team first synthesized the state-of-the-art in ATIS implementations. Then a commuter survey was conducted in Austin, Texas to examine commuters' travel patterns, preferences and requirements on traveler information, and attitudes toward toll roads and ATIS implementation. Next, based on the survey results, a simulation case study was conducted on the transportation network of Austin, Texas using DYNASMART-P model. Finally, ATIS benefit cost analysis, implementation issues, technologies, funding opportunities, and potential business models were investigated. It was found that the impact of traveler information on a commuter’s route switching and toll road choice is positive. The simulation results indicate that providing traveler information could significantly increase toll road (SH 130) usage and toll revenue. As a result of a portion of traffic diverting to a toll road, the traffic operations on the non-tolled alternative route were improved. Deploying ATIS can be a very promising method to increase toll revenue and relieve traffic congestion on the non-tolled alternative route.

[1]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Modeling Revealed and Stated En-Route Travel Response to Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 1996 .

[2]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECT OF ATIS ON COMMUTERS' ROUTE CHOICE DECISIONS , 1995 .

[3]  L. Stalker,et al.  Does Travel Information Influence Commuter and Noncommuter Behavior?: Results from the San Francisco Bay Area TravInfo Project , 1999 .

[4]  Shomik Raj Mehndiratta,et al.  Likely Users of Advanced Traveler Information Systems: Evidence from the Seattle Region , 2000 .

[5]  Youngbin Yim TravInfo Evaluation: Traveler Response Element Broad Area Study: Phase 2 Results Analysis of Wave-2 Survey , 1997 .

[6]  J E Lappin,et al.  A MARKET ANALYSIS OF THE COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC INFORMATION BUSINESS , 1994 .

[7]  Adel W. Sadek,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Deployment in a Medium-Sized Area: Case Study with ITS Deployment Analysis System , 2003 .

[8]  Kevin N. Balke,et al.  BENEFITS OF REAL-TIME TRAVEL INFORMATION IN HOUSTON, TEXAS , 1995 .

[9]  D. L. Gerlough,et al.  Traffic flow theory : a monograph , 1975 .

[10]  A. Khattak,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Spatial Knowledge and En Route Diversion Behavior in Chicago and San Francisco: Implications for Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 1998 .

[11]  C Michael Walton,et al.  Toll Collection Technology and Best Practices , 2007 .

[12]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Human Factors Research Recommendations for the Development of Design Guidelines for Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 1993 .

[13]  C. Y. David Yang Designing Advanced Traveler Information Systems from a Driver’s Perspective: Results of a Driving Simulation Study , 1998 .

[14]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Toll Road Origin-Destination Travel Survey: Internet and Mail-Back Response Analysis and Implications for Future Surveys , 2001 .

[15]  David Bernstein,et al.  INTEGRATING DRIVER INFORMATION AND CONGESTION PRICING SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[16]  Eric N Schreffler,et al.  San Diego’s Interstate 15 Congestion Pricing Project: Attitudinal, Behavioral, and Institutional Issues , 2002 .

[17]  A. Hobeika,et al.  ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEM USERS' NEEDS IN I-95 NORTHEAST CORRIDOR , 1996 .

[18]  Mas Mustafa,et al.  IMPLEMENTATION OF DRIVER INFORMATION SYSTEM USING DEDICATED SHORT RANGE COMMUNICATION MEDIA , 1995 .

[19]  M Hallenbeck CHOOSING THE ROUTE TO TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEPLOYMENT. DECISION FACTORS FOR CREATING PUBLIC/PRIVATE BUSINESS PLANS , 1998 .

[20]  Ronald Koo,et al.  Commuter Response to Traffic Information on an Incident , 1998 .

[21]  M. G. Lay,et al.  The Melbourne City Link Project , 2002 .

[22]  K Goulias,et al.  USER PERCEPTIONS OF ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE , 2002 .

[23]  C. Y. David Yang,et al.  Using Human Information Processing Principles to Design Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 2001 .

[24]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[25]  Donald Richard Drew,et al.  Traffic flow theory and control , 1968 .

[26]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  A survey-based methodology to determine information requirements for advanced traveler information systems , 1995 .

[27]  Francois Dion,et al.  Metropolitan Model Deployment Initiative : San Antonio evaluation report , 2000 .

[28]  Karl E. Kim,et al.  User Requirements and Willingness To Pay for Traffic Information Systems: Case Study of Sydney, Australia , 1999 .

[29]  Mike McDonald,et al.  INSTRUMENTED VEHICLE STUDIES OF TRAFFIC FLOW MODELS , 1998 .

[30]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  Anticipated Travel Time, Information Acquisition, and Actual Experience: Hanshin Expressway Route Closure, Osaka-Sakai, Japan , 2000 .

[31]  C E Wallace,et al.  Handbook of computer models for traffic operations analysis: final report , 1982 .

[32]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Austin Commuter Survey: Findings and Recommendations , 2005 .

[33]  Karl E Wunderlich,et al.  TIME MANAGEMENT BENEFITS OF ATIS FOR UNFAMILIAR URBAN DRIVERS , 2002 .

[34]  Vaishali P. Shah,et al.  Potential of Advanced Traveler Information System to Reduce Travel Disutility: Assessment in Washington, D.C., Region , 2003 .

[35]  A. Khattak,et al.  Why Will Some Individuals Pay for Travel Information When It Can Be Free? Analysis of a Bay Area Traveler Survey , 2001 .

[36]  Karl E Wunderlich,et al.  Seattle Metropolitan Model Deployment Initiative Evaluation: Results and Key Findings from Modeling , 2000 .

[37]  S D Clark Handbook of Transportation Science , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[38]  David M Levinson,et al.  The Value of Advanced Traveler Information Systems for Route Choice , 2003 .