An integrated assessment of the 1,4-dioxane cancer mode of action and threshold response in rodents.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Lisa M. Corey | M. LeBaron | R. Budinsky | J. Klapacz | Janet K. Anderson | N. Forsberg | M. Lafranconi
[1] Ying Chen,et al. Mechanistic Considerations in 1,4-Dioxane Cancer Risk Assessment. , 2022, Current opinion in environmental science & health.
[2] Ying Chen,et al. Oxidative Stress, Glutathione and CYP2E1 in 1,4-Dioxane Liver Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity: Insights from Animal Models , 2022, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health.
[3] C. Yauk,et al. AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for oxidative DNA damage leading to mutations and chromosomal aberrations , 2022, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.
[4] Xianming Deng,et al. Glycogen accumulation and phase separation drives liver tumor initiation , 2021, Cell.
[5] Ying Chen,et al. Oxidative stress and genotoxicity in 1,4-dioxane liver toxicity as evidenced in a mouse model of glutathione deficiency. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.
[6] Virunya S Bhat,et al. Assessing chemical carcinogenicity: hazard identification, classification, and risk assessment. Insight from a Toxicology Forum state-of-the-science workshop , 2021, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[7] B. Lake,et al. Critical evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) , 2021, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[8] Caroline H. Johnson,et al. Identification of dose-dependent DNA damage and repair responses from subchronic exposure to 1,4-dioxane in mice using a systems analysis approach. , 2021, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[9] L. Haws,et al. Transcriptomic analyses of livers from mice exposed to 1,4-dioxane for up to 90 days to assess potential mode(s) of action underlying liver tumor development , 2021, Current research in toxicology.
[10] Caicun Zhou,et al. Alterations of DNA damage response pathway: Biomarker and therapeutic strategy for cancer immunotherapy , 2021, Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B.
[11] Lisa M. Corey,et al. A 90-day drinking water study in mice to characterize early events in the cancer mode of action of 1,4-dioxane. , 2020, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[12] Masatoshi Watanabe,et al. New horizons of DNA adductome for exploring environmental causes of cancer , 2020, Cancer science.
[13] Y. Matsumoto,et al. Inflammasome Sensor NLRP1 Confers Acquired Drug Resistance to Temozolomide in Human Melanoma , 2020, Cancers.
[14] J. Corton,et al. A Set of Six Gene Expression Biomarkers Identify Rat Liver Tumorigens in Short-Term Assays. , 2020, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[15] P. Steinberg,et al. Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens , 2020, Archives of Toxicology.
[16] J. Klaunig,et al. Constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) mediates dieldrin-induced liver tumorigenesis in mouse , 2020, Archives of Toxicology.
[17] S. Fukushima,et al. Comprehensive analysis of DNA adducts (DNA adductome analysis) in the liver of rats treated with 1,4-dioxane , 2020, Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences.
[18] R. J. Price,et al. Piperonyl butoxide: mode of action analysis for mouse liver tumour formation and human relevance. , 2020, Toxicology.
[19] E. Laurini,et al. Role of Rad51 and DNA repair in cancer: A molecular perspective. , 2020, Pharmacology & therapeutics.
[20] A. Boobis,et al. Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 1: A unified theory of carcinogenicity based on contemporary knowledge. , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[21] A. Boobis,et al. Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 2: Current knowledge of carcinogenesis shows that categorization as a carcinogen or non-carcinogen is not scientifically credible. , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[22] Andrew Williams,et al. Using a gene expression biomarker to identify DNA damage‐inducing agents in microarray profiles , 2018, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.
[23] Takayoshi Suzuki,et al. Using RNA-Seq with 11 marker genes to evaluate 1,4-dioxane compared with typical genotoxic and non-genotoxic rat hepatocarcinogens. , 2018, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.
[24] S. Fukushima,et al. In vivo positive mutagenicity of 1,4-dioxane and quantitative analysis of its mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in rats , 2018, Archives of Toxicology.
[25] Manoj Aggarwal,et al. Minimum datasets to establish a CAR‐mediated mode of action for rodent liver tumors , 2018, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[26] M. Moore,et al. Development of an adverse outcome pathway for chemically induced hepatocellular carcinoma: case study of AFB1, a human carcinogen with a mutagenic mode of action , 2018, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[27] M. LeBaron,et al. Integration of novel approaches demonstrates simultaneous metabolic inactivation and CAR-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis of a nitrification inhibitor , 2017, Toxicology reports.
[28] M. Dourson,et al. Update: Mode of action (MOA) for liver tumors induced by oral exposure to 1,4‐dioxane , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[29] Igor Linkov,et al. Quantitative weight of evidence to assess confidence in potential modes of action , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[30] E. Wakeland,et al. RAD51 interconnects between DNA replication, DNA repair and immunity , 2017, Nucleic acids research.
[31] H. Drexler,et al. Metabolism and toxicokinetics of 1,4-dioxane in humans after inhalational exposure at rest and under physical stress , 2016, Archives of Toxicology.
[32] E. Shaker,et al. INHIBITORY ACTIVITY OF PROTECTED EDIBLE PLANTS ON OXIDATIVE STRESS INDUCED BY ORAL 1,4-DIOXANE. , 2016, Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology.
[33] M. LeBaron,et al. Characterization of nuclear receptor-mediated murine hepatocarcinogenesis of the herbicide pronamide and its human relevance. , 2014, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[34] Alan R. Boobis,et al. The use of mode of action information in risk assessment: Quantitative key events/dose-response framework for modeling the dose-response for key events , 2014, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[35] E. Mcconnell,et al. Mode of action analysis for liver tumors from oral 1,4-dioxane exposures and evidence-based dose response assessment. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[36] Virunya S Bhat,et al. Dose-response modeling of early molecular and cellular key events in the CAR-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis pathway. , 2014, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[37] J. Corton,et al. Mode of action framework analysis for receptor-mediated toxicity: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) as a case study , 2014, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[38] T. Starr,et al. Mode of action and dose–response framework analysis for receptor-mediated toxicity: The aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a case study , 2014, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[39] Wen Xie,et al. Mode of action and human relevance analysis for nuclear receptor-mediated liver toxicity: A case study with phenobarbital as a model constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activator , 2014, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[40] M. LeBaron,et al. An integrated approach for prospectively investigating a mode-of-action for rodent liver effects. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.
[41] M. Ohnishi,et al. Distribution of 1,4-dioxane by combined inhalation plus oral exposure routes in rats , 2012 .
[42] B. Tudek,et al. Damage of DNA and proteins by major lipid peroxidation products in genome stability , 2012, Free radical research.
[43] D. Hanahan,et al. Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.
[44] Tak Yee Aw,et al. Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis. , 2010, Free radical biology & medicine.
[45] S. Cohen. Evaluation of Possible Carcinogenic Risk to Humans Based on Liver Tumors in Rodent Assays , 2010, Toxicologic pathology.
[46] S. Fukushima,et al. Carcinogenicity studies of 1,4-dioxane administered in drinking-water to rats and mice for 2 years. , 2009, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[47] S. Fukushima,et al. Two-year inhalation study of carcinogenicity and chronic toxicity of 1,4-dioxane in male rats , 2009, Inhalation toxicology.
[48] R. Maronpot. Biological Basis of Differential Susceptibility to Hepatocarcinogenesis among Mouse Strains , 2009, Journal of toxicologic pathology.
[49] T. Rossman,et al. Inappropriate cytotoxicity measurements , 2009, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.
[50] J. Baron,et al. Changes in Cell-Cycle Kinetics Responsible for Limiting Somatic Growth in Mice , 2008, Pediatric Research.
[51] S. Fukushima,et al. Thirteen-week oral toxicity of 1,4-dioxane in rats and mice. , 2008, The Journal of toxicological sciences.
[52] S. Fukushima,et al. Thirteen-Week Inhalation Toxicity of 1,4-Dioxane in Rats , 2008 .
[53] Ivan Rusyn,et al. Mouse liver effects of cyproconazole, a triazole fungicide: role of the constitutive androstane receptor. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[54] M. Wyatt,et al. Methylating agents and DNA repair responses: Methylated bases and sources of strand breaks. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.
[55] H. Bartsch,et al. Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress in the genesis and perpetuation of cancer: role of lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, and repair , 2006, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.
[56] D. Eastmond,et al. Chromosome breakage is primarily responsible for the micronuclei induced by 1,4-dioxane in the bone marrow and liver of young CD-1 mice. , 2005, Mutation research.
[57] P. Gervasi,et al. Effects of dioxane on cytochrome P450 enzymes in liver, kidney, lung and nasal mucosa of rat , 2005, Archives of Toxicology.
[58] 김창균,et al. 1,4-Dioxane , 2003, Definitions.
[59] David Y. Lai,et al. PPARα Agonist-Induced Rodent Tumors: Modes of Action and Human Relevance , 2003 .
[60] M. Ikawa,et al. Cyclin G1 is involved in G2/M arrest in response to DNA damage and in growth control after damage recovery , 2001, Oncogene.
[61] M. Tsuchitani,et al. Repeat-assessment of 1,4-dioxane in a rat-hepatocyte replicative DNA synthesis (RDS) test: evidence for stimulus of hepatocyte proliferation. , 1999, Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie.
[62] R. Roberts. Peroxisome proliferators: mechanisms of adverse effects in rodents and molecular basis for species differences , 1999, Archives of Toxicology.
[63] M. Okudaira,et al. A Pathological Study on Spontaneous Hepatic Neoplasms in BDF1 Mice , 1998 .
[64] V. Bohr,et al. Repair of Oxidative Damage to Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA in Mammalian Cells* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[65] Y. Uno,et al. An in vivo-in vitro replicative DNA synthesis (RDS) test using rat hepatocytes as an early prediction assay for nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens screening of 22 known positives and 25 noncarcinogens. , 1994, Mutation research.
[66] K. Kleibl,et al. Repair of O6-methylguanine and O4-methylthymine by the human and rat O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferases. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[67] G. Long,et al. Incidence of Spontaneous Neoplastic and Nonneoplastic Lesions in Charles River CD-1® Mice Varies with Breeding Origin , 1993, Toxicologic pathology.
[68] J. Yamate,et al. Background pathology in BDF1 mice allowed to live out their life-span , 1990, Laboratory animals.
[69] J. Brown,et al. Is 1,4-dioxane a genotoxic carcinogen? , 1990, Cancer letters.
[70] E. Mirkova. Activity of the rodent carcinogen 1,4-dioxane in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay. , 1989, Mutation research.
[71] W. Stott,et al. Differentiation of the mechanisms of oncogenicity of 1,4-dioxane and 1,3-hexachlorobutadiene in the rat. , 1981, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.
[72] J. Young,et al. Dose-dependent fate of 1,4-dioxane in rats. , 1978, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.
[73] M. Argus,et al. Tissue and subcellular distribution of 3H-dioxane in the rat and apparent lack of microsome-catalyzed covalent binding in the target tissue. , 1977, Life sciences.
[74] M. Argus,et al. Structural identification of p-dioxane-2-one as the major urinary metabolite of p-dioxane , 1977, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.
[75] M. Argus,et al. Metabolism in vivo of dioxane: effect of inducers and inhibitors of hepatic mixed-function oxidases. , 1977, Biochemical pharmacology.
[76] R. Kociba,et al. 1,4-Dioxane. I. Results of a 2-year ingestion study in rats , 1974 .
[77] R. Kociba,et al. 1,4-Dioxane. II. Results of a 2-year inhalation study in rats , 1974 .
[78] S. Itoh,et al. In vivo genotoxicity of 1,4-dioxane evaluated by liver and bone marrow micronucleus tests and Pig-a assay in rats. , 2019, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.
[79] M. Gerstein,et al. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[80] T. J. Weber,et al. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of 1,4-Dioxane in rats, mice, and humans. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[81] T. Goldsworthy,et al. Examination of potential mechanisms of carcinogenicity of 1,4-dioxane in rat nasal epithelial cells and hepatocytes , 2005, Archives of Toxicology.
[82] M. Hayashi,et al. 1,4‐Dioxane is not mutagenic in five in vitro assays and mouse peripheral blood micronucleus assay, but is in mouse liver micronucleus assay , 1998, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.
[83] J. Grisham,et al. Interspecies comparison of liver carcinogenesis: implications for cancer risk assessment. , 1997, Carcinogenesis.
[84] W. Jones,et al. The effect of peroxisome proliferators on microsomal, peroxisomal, and mitochondrial enzyme activities in the liver and kidney. , 1987, Drug metabolism reviews.
[85] J. Young,et al. Identification of beta-hydroxyethoxyacetic acid as the major urinary metabolite of 1,4-dioxane in the rat. , 1977, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.