Improving Learning Achievement in Science Education for Elementary School Students via Blended Learning

Blended learning—which combines online learning with traditional face-to-face classroom instruction—is currently held in high regard. In elementary schools, science and technology education aims to help children use technology tools and to learn how disciplines such as math and science are relevant to engineering. In this study, the authors examined what type of learning profile contributes to higher achievement in science and technology in a blended learning environment. The participants consisted of 106 elementary school students (grades three to six) from two different schools. The authors adapted the Online Technologies Self-Efficacy Scale (OTSES) and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) to measure students' computer skills and learning motivation, respectively, and to understand how the blended learning environment affected their learning achievement. The results were as follows: 1) Computer skills significantly improved for all students except sixth-graders. 2) The blended learning environment had no significant effect on learning motivation. 3) In grades four and five, students in the experimental group improved more in learning achievement than students in the control group, as reflected by their higher MSLQ and OTSES scores.

[1]  Yan Tang,et al.  Research and Application of Group Cooperative Learning + SPOC Mixed Teaching in Programming Course , 2017 .

[2]  Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun,et al.  Analysis of Learning Achievement and Teacher-Student Interactions in Flipped and Conventional Classrooms. , 2016 .

[3]  Linda Corrin,et al.  Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCs , 2014, LAK.

[4]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Mixing and blending MOOC Technologies with face-to-face pedagogies , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[5]  Michael J. Cennamo,et al.  Blended Learning Improves Science Education , 2015, Cell.

[6]  Robert Rueda,et al.  Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  Chong Ho Yu,et al.  Validation of the Online Technologies Self-Efficacy Scale (OTSES). , 2000 .

[8]  Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun,et al.  The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students' self-regulation , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Promoting active learning & leveraging dashboards for curriculum assessment in an OpenEdX introductory CS course for middle school , 2014, L@S.

[10]  Y. Shinn Teaching strategies, their use and effectiveness as perceived by teachers of agriculture: A national study , 1997 .

[11]  Subhashni Appana,et al.  A Review of Benefits and Limitations of Online Learning in the Context of the Student, the Instructor and the Tenured Faculty , 2008 .

[12]  Johannes Strobel,et al.  Modeling Learning Units by Capturing Context with IMS LD , 2011 .

[13]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[14]  Mar Pérez-Sanagustín,et al.  Does Taking a MOOC as a Complement for Remedial Courses Have an Effect on My Learning Outcomes? A Pilot Study on Calculus , 2016, EC-TEL.

[15]  Muhammed Yusuf The impact of self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ academic achievement , 2011 .