Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jeffrey Braithwaite | Chiara Pomare | Johanna Westbrook | Robyn Clay-Williams | Kate Churruca | Jessica Herkes | Kristiana Ludlow | Elise McPherson | Frances Rapport | Janet C Long | Elizabeth Austin | J. Braithwaite | J. Westbrook | R. Clay-Williams | L. Ellis | F. Rapport | K. Churruca | C. Pomare | E. Austin | J. Long | A. Hogden | Mia Bierbaum | P. Hibbert | Janet C. Long | K. Ludlow | Louise A Ellis | J. Herkes | Anne Hogden | Claire Boyling | Mia Bierbaum | Patti Shih | Rebecca Seah | Peter D Hibbert | R. Seah | P. Shih | Elise McPherson | Claire Boyling | Patti Shih | Chiara Pomare
[1] J. Braithwaite,et al. Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review , 2017, BMJ Open.
[2] Anthony R Artino,et al. Beyond Citation Rates: A Real-Time Impact Analysis of Health Professions Education Research Using Altmetrics , 2017, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[3] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies? , 2017, Scientometrics.
[4] K. Slim,et al. Impact factor: An assessment tool for journals or for scientists? , 2017, Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
[5] N. Valsangkar,et al. Endangered academia: preserving the pediatric surgeon scientist. , 2017, Journal of pediatric surgery.
[6] A. Vaccaro,et al. The Evolution of Current Research Impact Metrics: From Bibliometrics to Altmetrics? , 2017, Clinical spine surgery.
[7] George M. Santangelo. Article-level assessment of influence and translation in biomedical research , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.
[8] K. Hinchcliff,et al. Metrics and the Scientific Literature: Deciding What to Read , 2017, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.
[9] Seena Fazel,et al. What is the impact of a research publication? , 2017, Evidence-Based Mental Health.
[10] Ronald Rousseau,et al. Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation , 2017, PloS one.
[11] Maria Liakata,et al. Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements , 2017, PloS one.
[12] Alexandra Bolocan,et al. Tendencies on Traditional Metrics. , 2017, Chirurgia.
[13] Denis Borenstein,et al. The Brazilian scientific output published in journals: A study based on a large CV database , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[14] Gangan Prathap,et al. Citation indices and dimensional homogeneity , 2017, ArXiv.
[15] Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al. The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded , 2016, Journal of Korean medical science.
[16] Armen Yuri Gasparyan,et al. Impact Factor : Moving Toward an Alternative and Combined Scientometric Approach , 2017 .
[17] Biresh K. Sahoo,et al. Research productivity in management schools of India during 1968-2015: A directional benefit-of-doubt model analysis ☆ , 2017 .
[18] Ольга Москалева,et al. День Clarivate Analytics , 2017 .
[19] Announcement: Nature journals support the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. , 2017, Nature.
[20] Robert M Carey,et al. Quantifying Scientific Merit: Is it Time to Transform the Impact Factor? , 2016, Circulation research.
[21] L. Napolitano. Scholarly Activity Requirements for Critical Care Fellowship Program Directors: What Should It Be? How Should We Measure it? , 2016, Critical care medicine.
[22] Giovanni Abramo,et al. Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011–2014) , 2016, Scientometrics.
[23] J. Braithwaite,et al. Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review protocol , 2016, BMJ Open.
[24] E. M. Kreines,et al. Control model for the alignment of the quality assessment of scientific documents based on the analysis of content-related context , 2016 .
[25] Zili Zhang,et al. PR-Index: Using the h-Index and PageRank for Determining True Impact , 2016, PloS one.
[26] Feng Xia,et al. Identifying Anomalous Citations for Objective Evaluation of Scholarly Article Impact , 2016, PloS one.
[27] K. Freund,et al. Longitudinal Analysis of Gender Differences in Academic Productivity Among Medical Faculty Across 24 Medical Schools in the United States , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[28] Ewen Callaway,et al. Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric , 2016, Nature.
[29] Antonia Ferrer-Sapena,et al. The impact factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics , 2016 .
[30] Kevin W Boyack,et al. Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines , 2016, PLoS biology.
[31] E. Frixione,et al. Assessing Individual Intellectual Output in Scientific Research: Mexico’s National System for Evaluating Scholars Performance in the Humanities and the Behavioral Sciences , 2016, PloS one.
[32] Vincent Larivière,et al. What determines researchers’ scientific impact? A case study of Quebec researchers , 2016 .
[33] Ten-Year Publication Trajectories of Health Services Research Career Development Award Recipients , 2016, Evaluation & the health professions.
[34] Khaled Moustafa,et al. Aberration of the Citation , 2016, Accountability in research.
[35] Megan M. Tschudy,et al. Pediatric Academic Productivity: Pediatric Benchmarks for the h- and g-Indices. , 2016, The Journal of pediatrics.
[36] L M Bouter,et al. How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers , 2016, BMJ Open.
[37] S. Azer,et al. Bibliometric analysis of the top-cited gastroenterology and hepatology articles , 2016, BMJ Open.
[38] A. Harlev,et al. Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics , 2016, Asian journal of andrology.
[39] Moreno Marzolla. Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification , 2016, J. Informetrics.
[40] Johan Bollen,et al. An efficient system to fund science: from proposal review to peer-to-peer distributions , 2016, Scientometrics.
[41] Luis A. Nunes Amaral,et al. The Distribution of the Asymptotic Number of Citations to Sets of Publications by a Researcher or from an Academic Department Are Consistent with a Discrete Lognormal Model , 2015, PloS one.
[42] Heather Lea Moulaison,et al. Supporting Scholars: An Analysis of Academic Library Websites' Documentation on Metrics and Impact , 2015 .
[43] Brent Thoma,et al. The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact. , 2015, Annals of emergency medicine.
[44] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex‐ante and ex‐post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[45] Mohamed Ben Ahmed,et al. New scientometric indicator for the qualitative evaluation of scientific production , 2015 .
[46] D. Knudson. Kinesiology Faculty Citations Across Academic Rank , 2015 .
[47] Christopher W. Belter,et al. Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits. , 2015, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[48] J. Waljee. Discussion: Are Quantitative Measures of Academic Productivity Correlated with Academic Rank in Plastic Surgery? A National Study , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.
[49] A. Kali. Scientific impact and altmetrics , 2015, Indian journal of pharmacology.
[50] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[51] M. Christopher. Weighing the impact (factor) of publishing in veterinary journals. , 2015, Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology.
[52] S. Rijcke,et al. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.
[53] Javier Franco Aixelá,et al. Publishing and impact criteria, and their bearing on Translation Studies: In search of comparability , 2015 .
[54] Edward S. Lee,et al. Impact of Subspecialty Fellowship Training on Research Productivity Among Academic Plastic Surgery Faculty in the United States , 2015, Eplasty.
[55] B. Páll‐Gergely. On the Confusion of Quality with Impact: A Note on Pyke's M-Index , 2015 .
[56] Yasunori Baba,et al. Impact-oriented science policies and scientific publication practices: The case of life sciences in Japan , 2015 .
[57] K. Selvarajoo. Measuring merit: take the risk. , 2015, Science.
[58] A. Arimoto. Declining symptom of academic productivity in the Japanese research university sector , 2015 .
[59] P. Shekelle,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[60] Molly Carnes,et al. A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution , 2015, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[61] Henk F. Moed,et al. Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[62] C Nadine Wathen,et al. Into the gray: a modified approach to citation analysis to better understand research impact. , 2015, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[63] Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti,et al. A New Bibliometric Index Based on the Shape of the Citation Distribution , 2014, PloS one.
[64] Liz Allen,et al. Alternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact , 2014, PLoS biology.
[65] L. Ransdell,et al. Editorial Board Position Statement Regarding the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) Recommendations With Respect to Journal Impact Factors , 2014, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.
[66] Phaedra E Cress. Using altmetrics and social media to supplement impact factor: maximizing your article's academic and societal impact. , 2014, Aesthetic surgery journal.
[67] Birger Larsen,et al. A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators , 2014, Scientometrics.
[68] Medha Joshi,et al. Bibliometric indicators for evaluating the quality of scientifc publications. , 2014, The journal of contemporary dental practice.
[69] Christian Pieter Hoffmann,et al. Impact Factor 2.0: Applying Social Network Analysis to Scientific Impact Assessment , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[70] Douglas E Green,et al. Practice corner: the science and art of measuring the impact of an article. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[71] Todd A. Carpenter,et al. Comparing digital apples to digital apples: Background on NISO's effort to build an infrastructure for new forms of scholarly assessment , 2014, Inf. Serv. Use.
[72] Bogumił Kamiński,et al. Advances in Social Simulation - Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Social Simulation Association, ESSA 2013, Warsaw, Poland, September 16-20, 2013 , 2014, ESSA.
[73] Salih Selek,et al. Use of h index and g index for American academic psychiatry , 2013, Scientometrics.
[74] Akshaya Kumar Biswal,et al. An Absolute Index (Ab-index) to Measure a Researcher’s Useful Contributions and Productivity , 2013, PloS one.
[75] Edward Towpik,et al. Sand Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) , 2013 .
[76] E. Benzel,et al. Research productivity and fellowship training in neurosurgery. , 2013, World neurosurgery.
[77] H Hunt Batjer,et al. Standardizing the evaluation of scientific and academic performance in neurosurgery--critical review of the "h" index and its variants. , 2013, World neurosurgery.
[78] Alfred E. Hartemink,et al. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar , 2013, PeerJ.
[79] J. Danielson,et al. Quantifying Published Scholarly Works of Experiential Education Directors , 2013, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
[80] Adam Eyre-Walker,et al. The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations , 2013, PLoS biology.
[81] Harald Heinzl,et al. Assessing the scientific relevance of a single publication over time , 2013 .
[82] Edward N. Pugh,et al. Embracing the principles of the San Francisco Declaration of Research Assessment: Robert Balaban’s Editorial , 2013, The Journal of general physiology.
[83] Sauro Succi,et al. The Z-index: A geometric representation of productivity and impact which accounts for information in the entire rank-citation profile , 2013, J. Informetrics.
[84] Albert-László Barabási,et al. Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.
[85] Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al. Google Scholar e índice h en biomedicina: la popularización de la evaluación bibliométrica , 2013 .
[86] Liaojun Pang,et al. Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[87] R. Cagan. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment , 2013, Disease Models & Mechanisms.
[88] Correction: The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices across Scientific Fields , 2013, PLoS ONE.
[89] Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al. Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric asessment , 2013, Medicina intensiva.
[90] J. Ruiz-Castillo,et al. The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices across Scientific Fields , 2013, PloS one.
[91] Alejandro M. Aragón,et al. A measure for the impact of research , 2013, Scientific Reports.
[92] Stefan C. Wolter,et al. The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences , 2012, Research in Higher Education.
[93] Public attitudes to science in South Africa , 2013 .
[94] Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al. Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research , 2012, PloS one.
[95] Warren Thorngate,et al. By the Numbers: Track Record, Flawed Reviews, Journal Space, and the Fate of Talented Authors , 2013, ESSA.
[96] Reflecting on sharing scholarship, considering clinical impact and impact factor. , 2012, Nurse education today.
[97] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. Publication and patent analysis of European researchers in the field of production technology and manufacturing systems , 2012, Scientometrics.
[98] Michael J. Kurtz,et al. A Measure of Total Research Impact Independent of Time and Discipline , 2012, PloS one.
[99] Gangan Prathap. Evaluating journal performance metrics , 2012, Scientometrics.
[100] Konrad Campowsky,et al. BonFIRE: A Multi-cloud Test Facility for Internet of Services Experimentation , 2012, TRIDENTCOM.
[101] D. Kallmes,et al. Pre-residency publication rate strongly predicts future academic radiology potential. , 2012, Academic radiology.
[102] Y. Ho,et al. Bibliometric analysis of the Polish Journal of Environmental Studies (2000-11) , 2012 .
[103] Tindaro Cicero,et al. A sensitivity analysis of researchers' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[104] Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al. An Internet measure of the value of citations , 2012, Inf. Sci..
[105] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. The success-index: an alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual’s research output , 2012, Scientometrics.
[106] Gunther Eysenbach,et al. Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.
[107] David M. Walker,et al. Citation pattern and lifespan: a comparison of discipline, institution, and individual , 2011, Scientometrics.
[108] William J. Sutherland,et al. Quantifying the Impact and Relevance of Scientific Research , 2011, PloS one.
[109] Gabriel Kreiman,et al. Nine Criteria for a Measure of Scientific Output , 2011, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[110] Gregory D. Webster,et al. The research productivity of academic psychologists: assessment, trends, and best practice recommendations , 2011, Scientometrics.
[111] Nathan Efron BScOptom PhD DSc,et al. Citation analysis of Australia‐trained optometrists , 2011, Clinical & experimental optometry.
[112] Menghui Li,et al. Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: distinguishing between prestige and popularity , 2011, ArXiv.
[113] Manfred Maier,et al. Development of a practical tool to measure the impact of publications on the society based on focus group discussions with scientists , 2011, BMC public health.
[114] R. L. Ribeiro,et al. Comentários adicionais ao artigo de Thomaz e cols.: como avaliar "qualidade de publicação" , 2011 .
[115] J. Sahel. Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research Performance , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.
[116] P. Devos. Research and bibliometrics: a long history…. , 2011, Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology.
[117] François Gélineau,et al. Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec , 2011, Scientometrics.
[118] Aaron A. Sorensen,et al. Productivity and impact of the top 100 cited Parkinson's disease investigators since 1985. , 2011, Journal of Parkinson's disease.
[119] Richard Van Noorden. Love thy lab neighbour , 2010 .
[120] N. Assimakis,et al. A new author’s productivity index: p-index , 2010, Scientometrics.
[121] Wolfgang Stroebe,et al. The graying of academia: will it reduce scientific productivity? , 2010, The American psychologist.
[122] Adam Finch,et al. Can we do better than existing author citation metrics? , 2010, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[123] Christian Gumpenberger,et al. Going beyond Citations: SERUM — a new Tool Provided by a Network of Libraries , 2010 .
[124] Richard Van Noorden. Metrics: A profusion of measures , 2010, Nature.
[125] Péter Jacsó,et al. Eigenfactor and article influence scores in the Journal Citation Reports , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..
[126] V. Durieux,et al. Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication. , 2010, Radiology.
[127] Richard van Noorden. Love thy lab neighbour. , 2010, Nature.
[128] Richard Van Noorden,et al. Metrics: A profusion of measures. , 2010, Nature.
[129] João Claro,et al. A made-to-measure indicator for cross-disciplinary bibliometric ranking of researchers performance , 2010, Scientometrics.
[130] Gad Saad,et al. Applying the h-index in exploring bibliometric properties of elite marketing scholars , 2010, Scientometrics.
[131] N. Haslam,et al. Early-career scientific achievement and patterns of authorship: the mixed blessings of publication leadership and collaboration , 2009 .
[132] Yanping Wang,et al. An Integrated Approach to Evaluate Faculty Members’ Research Performance , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[133] C. Neylon,et al. Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact , 2009, PLoS biology.
[134] John Mingers,et al. Measuring the research contribution of management academics using the Hirsch-index , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..
[135] Fabio Casati,et al. Exploring and Understanding Scientific Metrics in Citation Networks , 2009, Complex.
[136] Maja Jokić. H-index as a new scientometric indicator , 2009 .
[137] Kuan-Teh Jeang,et al. H-index, mentoring-index, highly-cited and highly-accessed: how to evaluate scientists? , 2008, Retrovirology.
[138] T. V. Leeuwen. Testing the validity of the Hirsch-index for research assessment purposes , 2008 .
[139] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data , 2008 .
[140] H. Marsh,et al. Improving the Peer-review Process for Grant Applications , 2022 .
[141] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Citation Counting, Citation Ranking, and h-Index of Human-Computer Interaction Researchers: A Comparison between Scopus and Web of Science , 2008, ArXiv.
[142] Ralf W. Schlosser,et al. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews , 2007 .
[143] Jürgen Harald Jacob,et al. Early recognition of high quality researchers of the German psychiatry by worldwide accessible bibliometric indicators , 2007, Scientometrics.
[144] Marjori Matzke,et al. F1000Prime recommendation of An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. , 2005 .
[145] S. Hawker,et al. Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically , 2002, Qualitative health research.
[146] J. King. A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation , 1987, J. Inf. Sci..
[147] J. R. Landis,et al. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.