The Effect of Sentence Accent on Non-Native Speech Perception in Noise

This paper investigates the uptake and use of prosodic information signalling sentence accent during native and nonnative speech perception in the presence of background noise. A phoneme monitoring experiment was carried out in which English, Dutch, and Finnish listeners were presented with target phonemes in semantically unpredictable yet meaningful English sentences. Sentences were presented in different levels of speech-shaped noise and, crucially, in two prosodic contexts in which the target-bearing word was either deaccented or accented. Results showed that overall performance was high for both the native and the non-native listeners; however, where native listeners seemed able to partially overcome the problems at the acoustic level in degraded listening conditions by using prosodic information signalling upcoming sentence accent, non-native listeners could not do so to the same extent. These results support the hypothesis that the performance difference between native and non-native listeners in the presence of background noise is, at least partially, caused by a reduced exploitation of contextual information during speech processing by non-native listeners.

[1]  A. D. Dominicis,et al.  Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages , 1999 .

[2]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review , 2010, Speech Commun..

[3]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Perception of English Prominence by Native Mandarin Chinese Speakers , 2010 .

[4]  Maria Luisa Garcia Lecumberri Perception of accentual focus by basque L2 learners of English , 1995 .

[5]  Petra Wagner Great expectations - introspective vs. perceptual prominence ratings and their acoustic correlates , 2005, INTERSPEECH.

[6]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Prosodic cues to semantic structure in native and nonnative listening , 2003, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[7]  M. Cooke,et al.  Consonant identification in noise by native and non-native listeners: effects of local context. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Lynne C. Nygaard,et al.  Contextual coherence and attention in phoneme monitoring , 1992 .

[9]  Esther Ruigendijk,et al.  ERP responses to processing prosodic phrasing of sentences in amplitude modulated noise , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  A. Weber,et al.  The role of attentional abilities in lexically guided perceptual learning by older listeners , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[12]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Odette Scharenborg,et al.  Language-independent processing in speech perception: Identification of English intervocalic consonants by speakers of eight European languages , 2010, Speech Commun..

[14]  Kristin Lemhöfer,et al.  Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[15]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[16]  Martti Vainio,et al.  Tonal features, intensity, and word order in the perception of prominence , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[17]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .