Online kinematic regulation by visual feedback for grasp versus transport during reach-to-pinch.

PURPOSE This study investigated novel kinematic performance parameters to understand regulation by visual feedback (VF) of the reaching hand on the grasp and transport components during the reach-to-pinch maneuver. Conventional metrics often signify discrete movement features to postulate sensory-based control effects (e.g., time for maximum velocity to signify feedback delay). The presented metrics of this study were devised to characterize relative vision-based control of the sub-movements across the entire maneuver. METHODS Movement performance was assessed according to reduced variability and increased efficiency of kinematic trajectories. Variability was calculated as the standard deviation about the observed mean trajectory for a given subject and VF condition across kinematic derivatives for sub-movements of inter-pad grasp (distance between thumb and index finger-pads; relative orientation of finger-pads) and transport (distance traversed by wrist). A Markov analysis then examined the probabilistic effect of VF on which movement component exhibited higher variability over phases of the complete maneuver. Jerk-based metrics of smoothness (minimal jerk) and energy (integrated jerk-squared) were applied to indicate total movement efficiency with VF. RESULTS/DISCUSSION The reductions in grasp variability metrics with VF were significantly greater (p<.05) compared to transport for velocity, acceleration, and jerk, suggesting separate control pathways for each component. The Markov analysis indicated that VF preferentially regulates grasp over transport when continuous control is modeled probabilistically during the movement. Efficiency measures demonstrated VF to be more integral for early motor planning of grasp than transport in producing greater increases in smoothness and trajectory adjustments (i.e., jerk-energy) early compared to late in the movement cycle. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate the greater regulation by VF on kinematic performance of grasp compared to transport and how particular features of this relativistic control occur continually over the maneuver. Utilizing the advanced performance metrics presented in this study facilitated characterization of VF effects continuously across the entire movement in corroborating the notion of separate control pathways for each component.

[1]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  M. Goodale,et al.  A model of the coupling between grip aperture and hand transport during human prehension , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  E. Brenner,et al.  Independent movements of the digits in grasping , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  W. G. Darling,et al.  Kinematic variability of grasp movements as a function of practice and movement speed , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Zong-Ming Li,et al.  Robust identification of three-dimensional thumb and index finger kinematics with a minimal set of markers. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[7]  N. Hogan,et al.  On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[10]  Zong-Ming Li,et al.  A digit alignment device for kinematic analysis of the thumb and index finger. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[11]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Control of Trajectory Modifications in Target-Directed Reaching. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Marco Santello,et al.  Choice of Contact Points during Multidigit Grasping: Effect of Predictability of Object Center of Mass Location , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[15]  Marco Santello,et al.  Patterns of Hand Motion during Grasping and the Influence of Sensory Guidance , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[17]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  U. Castiello,et al.  How Objects Are Grasped: The Interplay between Affordances and End-Goals , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  Maurizio Gentilucci,et al.  Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Automatic control of limb movement and posture , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  B. Röder,et al.  Integration of hand and finger location in external spatial coordinates for tactile localization. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Multisensory Integration during Motor Planning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  T. Milner,et al.  A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision , 1992, Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Pélisson,et al.  From Eye to Hand: Planning Goal-directed Movements , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[28]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection? , 2011, Human movement science.

[29]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  A Freivalds,et al.  Effect of carpal tunnel syndrome on grip force coordination on hand tools. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[32]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Keith Davids,et al.  Movement system variability , 2005 .

[35]  O. Bock,et al.  The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  M. Jeannerod Mechanisms of visuomotor coordination: A study in normal and brain-damaged subjects , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Gordon,et al.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Toshio Inui,et al.  The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping. , 2006, Human movement science.