Modeling the bio-refinery industry in rural areas: A participatory approach for policy options comparison

The development of bio-refineries has become a relevant topic in the EU's agenda. However, the promotion of a new industry in rural areas is typically hindered by the scarcity of human capital, lack of information, infrastructures, and competing interests. In this context, public support is unavoidable to assist promotion of this innovative sector. The various policy options reveal some strengths and drawbacks, posing the problem of finding the best trade-off to public decision makers. In this paper we aim at developing a methodology to support policy decision making within the biorefinery framework, with the purpose of determining a way to identify the most suitable policy option given the actual uncertainty in developing the bio-refinery industry in rural areas. The empirical experiment, based on a simulation of the enforcement of four identified policy instruments, highlights that, although subsidies and incentives to profitability of dedicated crops appear to have the greatest effects on the development of bio-refinery, the best performances are exhibited by technological innovation and information options.

[1]  Bart Kosko,et al.  ADAPTIVE INFERENCE IN FUZZY KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS , 1993 .

[2]  E. Annevelink,et al.  Assessment of BIOrefinery concepts and the implications for agricultural and forestry POLicy : Deliverable 7.6 : BIOPOL Final report , 2009 .

[3]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Participatory Modelling and Decision Support for Natural Resources Management in Climate Change Research , 2008 .

[4]  Stefan Reimann.  On the Design of Artificial Auto-associative Networks , 1997 .

[5]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[6]  Pietro Terna,et al.  Neural Networks for Economic and Financial Modelling , 1995 .

[7]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[8]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2004 .

[9]  John Ramsay,et al.  Problems with empiricism and the philosophy of science: Implications for purchasing research , 1998 .

[10]  Christine Rösch,et al.  Energy production from grassland – Assessing the sustainability of different process chains under German conditions , 2009 .

[11]  M. Mozaffarian.  Biorefinery Researcher Issue 4 , 2010 .

[12]  How to model different socio-economic and environmental aspects of biomass utilisation: Case study in selected regions in Slovenia and Croatia , 2007 .

[13]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[14]  Dominic Moran,et al.  Mapping public participation in the Water Framework Directive: A case study of the Pinios River Basin, Greece , 2007 .

[15]  H. Scholes.  Can energy crops become a realistic CO2 mitigation option in south west England , 1998 .

[16]  Emmy Bergsma,et al.  Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[17]  Gökhan Seçme,et al.  Prediction of socio-economical consequences of privatization at the firm level with fuzzy cognitive mapping , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - A LCA case study , 2010 .

[19]  C. Tattersall Smith,et al.  Opportunities, barriers, and strategies for forest bioenergy and bio-based product development in the Southern United States. , 2007 .

[20]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[21]  Paul Upham,et al.  Biofuels and regulatory co-production: critical stakeholder perceptions of carbon and sustainability reporting in the UK Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation , 2010 .

[22]  C. Bailey,et al.  Assessing the rural development potential of lignocellulosic biofuels in Alabama. , 2011 .

[23]  Emmanuel K. Yiridoe,et al.  Nonmarket cobenefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production , 2009 .

[24]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps as a communication and learning tool , 2010 .

[25]  L. Thrupp,et al.  Participatory methods in planning & political processes: Linking the grassroots & policies for sustainable development , 1994 .

[26]  Wei-Bin Zhang,et al.  Theory of Complex Systems and Economic Dynamics , 2002 .

[27]  R. Clift,et al.  Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems , 2007 .

[28]  K. Richards,et al.  Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects , 2005 .

[29]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Biofuels and the biorefinery concept , 2008 .

[30]  Jesus Ramos-Martin,et al.  Empiricism in ecological economics: a perspective from complex systems theory , 2003 .

[31]  J. L. Moigne,et al.  On theorizing the complexity of economic systems , 1995 .

[32]  M. Holopainen,et al.  Implications of Technological Development to Forestry , 2010 .

[33]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Econometrics and empirical economics , 2001 .

[34]  Seçkin Polat,et al.  A fuzzy cognitive map approach for effect-based operations: An illustrative case , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[35]  E. Tolman.  Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[36]  W. Max Corden,et al.  Booming Sector and De-Industrialisation in a Small Open Economy , 1982 .

[37]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .