Canalization of Gene Expression in the Drosophila Blastoderm by Gap Gene Cross Regulation

Developing embryos exhibit a robust capability to reduce phenotypic variations that occur naturally or as a result of experimental manipulation. This reduction in variation occurs by an epigenetic mechanism called canalization, a phenomenon which has resisted understanding because of a lack of necessary molecular data and of appropriate gene regulation models. In recent years, quantitative gene expression data have become available for the segment determination process in the Drosophila blastoderm, revealing a specific instance of canalization. These data show that the variation of the zygotic segmentation gene expression patterns is markedly reduced compared to earlier levels by the time gastrulation begins, and this variation is significantly lower than the variation of the maternal protein gradient Bicoid. We used a predictive dynamical model of gene regulation to study the effect of Bicoid variation on the downstream gap genes. The model correctly predicts the reduced variation of the gap gene expression patterns and allows the characterization of the canalizing mechanism. We show that the canalization is the result of specific regulatory interactions among the zygotic gap genes. We demonstrate the validity of this explanation by showing that variation is increased in embryos mutant for two gap genes, Krüppel and knirps, disproving competing proposals that canalization is due to an undiscovered morphogen, or that it does not take place at all. In an accompanying article in PLoS Computational Biology (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000303), we show that cross regulation between the gap genes causes their expression to approach dynamical attractors, reducing initial variation and providing a robust output. These results demonstrate that the Bicoid gradient is not sufficient to produce gap gene borders having the low variance observed, and instead this low variance is generated by gap gene cross regulation. More generally, we show that the complex multigenic phenomenon of canalization can be understood at a quantitative and predictive level by the application of a precise dynamical model.

[1]  C. Waddington.  Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters , 1942, Nature.

[2]  Waddington Ch,et al.  Canalization of Development and Genetic Assimilation of Acquired Characters , 1959 .

[3]  C. H. WADDINGTON,et al.  Canalization of Development and Genetic Assimilation of Acquired Characters , 1959, Nature.

[4]  L. Wolpert.  Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[6]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila , 1980, Nature.

[7]  B. Alberts,et al.  Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. , 1983, Journal of cell science.

[8]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Finger protein of novel structure encoded by hunchback, a second member of the gap class of Drosophila segmentation genes , 1987, Nature.

[9]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Pole region-dependent repression of the Drosophila gap gene Krüppel by maternal gene products , 1987, Cell.

[10]  W. J. Gehring,et al.  Hierarchy of the genetic interactions that specify the anteroposterior segmentation pattern of the Drosophila embryo as monitored by caudal protein expression , 1987 .

[11]  D Bopp,et al.  The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[12]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Abdominal segmentation of the Drosophila embryo requires a hormone receptor-like protein encoded by the gap gene knirps , 1988, Nature.

[13]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner , 1988, Cell.

[14]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Disruption of a putative Cys–zinc interaction eliminates the biological activity of the Krüppel finger protein , 1988, Nature.

[15]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos , 1988, Cell.

[16]  V. Pirrotta,et al.  A novel spatial transcription pattern associated with the segmentation gene, giant, of Drosophila. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[17]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Expression and embryonic function of empty spiracles: a Drosophila homeo box gene with two patterning functions on the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo. , 1989, Genes & development.

[18]  M Klingler,et al.  Two gap genes mediate maternal terminal pattern information in Drosophila. , 1990, Science.

[19]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  A morphogenetic gradient of hunchback protein organizes the expression of the gap genes Krüppel and knirps in the early Drosophila embryo , 1990, Nature.

[20]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  The orthodenticle gene is regulated by bicoid and torso and specifies Drosophila head development , 1990, Nature.

[21]  V. Pirrotta,et al.  Interactions of the Drosophila gap gene giant with maternal and zygotic pattern-forming genes. , 1991, Development.

[22]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts , 1991, Cell.

[23]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Control and function of terminal gap gene activity in the posterior pole region of the Drosophila embryo , 1991, Mechanisms of Development.

[24]  M. Levine,et al.  Spatial regulation of the gap gene giant during Drosophila development. , 1991, Development.

[25]  David H. Sharp,et al.  A connectionist model of development. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Gfinter Br.  Control and function of terminal gap gene activity in the posterior pole region of the Drosophila embryo , 1991 .

[27]  M. Levine,et al.  Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Krüppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Development.

[28]  E. Steingrímsson,et al.  bicoid and the terminal system activate tailless expression in the early Drosophila embryo. , 1992, Development.

[29]  Peter A. Lawrence,et al.  Control of Drosophila body pattern by the hunchback morphogen gradient , 1992, Cell.

[30]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Model for cooperative control of positional information in Drosophila by bicoid and maternal hunchback. , 1995, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[31]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Mechanism of eve stripe formation , 1995, Mechanisms of Development.

[32]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Trans- and cis-acting requirements for blastodermal expression of the head gap gene buttonhead , 1995, Mechanisms of Development.

[33]  D. Tautz,et al.  Zygotic caudal regulation by hunchback and its role in abdominal segment formation of the Drosophila embryo. , 1995, Development.

[34]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  Activation of posterior gap gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm , 1995, Nature.

[35]  G. Wagner,et al.  A POPULATION GENETIC THEORY OF CANALIZATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  Q Gao,et al.  Targeting gene expression to the head: the Drosophila orthodenticle gene is a direct target of the Bicoid morphogen. , 1998, Development.

[37]  D. Sharp,et al.  Stripe forming architecture of the gap gene system. , 1998, Developmental genetics.

[38]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution , 1998, Nature.

[39]  J. Reinitz,et al.  Rapid preparation of a panel of polyclonal antibodies to Drosophila segmentation proteins , 1998, Development Genes and Evolution.

[40]  Philip K. Maini,et al.  Mathematical models in morphogenesis , 1999 .

[41]  Yuefan Deng,et al.  Parallel Simulated Annealing by Mixing of States , 1999 .

[42]  Garth A. Gibson,et al.  Canalization in evolutionary genetics: a stabilizing theory? , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[43]  John Reinitz,et al.  Registration of the expression patterns of Drosophila segmentation genes by two independent methods , 2001, Bioinform..

[44]  John Reinitz,et al.  Optimal parallelization of simulated annealing by state mixing , 2001 .

[45]  A. Bergman,et al.  Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  S. Leibler,et al.  Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo , 2002, Nature.

[47]  Colin D. Meiklejohn,et al.  A single mode of canalization , 2002 .

[48]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos , 2003 .

[49]  Alexander M. Samsonov,et al.  New data processing technique based on the optimal control theory , 2003 .

[50]  Xiangyi Lu,et al.  Evidence for an epigenetic mechanism by which Hsp90 acts as a capacitor for morphological evolution , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[51]  Dmitri Papatsenko,et al.  A self-organizing system of repressor gradients establishes segmental complexity in Drosophila , 2003, Nature.

[52]  David M. Holloway,et al.  Making the body plan: Precision in the genetic hierarchy of Drosophila embryo segmentation , 2003, Silico Biol..

[53]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Dynamical Analysis of Regulatory Interactions in the Gap Gene System of Drosophila melanogaster , 2004, Genetics.

[54]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo , 2004, Nature.

[55]  W. Bialek,et al.  Diffusion and scaling during early embryonic pattern formation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[57]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Finding the center reliably: robust patterns of developmental gene expression. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[58]  T. Bisseling,et al.  Model for the robust establishment of precise proportions in the early Drosophila embryo. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[59]  Johannes Jaeger,et al.  A high-throughput method for quantifying gene expression data from early Drosophila embryos , 2005, Development Genes and Evolution.

[60]  N. Dostatni,et al.  Bicoid Determines Sharp and Precise Target Gene Expression in the Drosophila Embryo , 2005, Current Biology.

[61]  S. Leibler,et al.  Precise domain specification in the developing Drosophila embryo. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[62]  John Reinitz,et al.  Removal of background signal from in situ data on the expression of segmentation genes in Drosophila , 2005, Development Genes and Evolution.

[63]  Rustem F. Ismagilov,et al.  Dynamics of Drosophila embryonic patterning network perturbed in space and time using microfluidics , 2005, Nature.

[64]  W. Rappel,et al.  Embryonic pattern scaling achieved by oppositely directed morphogen gradients , 2006, Physical biology.

[65]  Leon Glass,et al.  Reverse Engineering the Gap Gene Network of Drosophila melanogaster , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[66]  T. F. Hansen.  The Evolution of Genetic Architecture , 2006 .

[67]  S. Bergmann,et al.  Pre-Steady-State Decoding of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient , 2007, PLoS biology.

[68]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Canalization of segmentation and its evolution in Drosophila , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Stanislav Y Shvartsman,et al.  Modeling the bicoid gradient: diffusion and reversible nuclear trapping of a stable protein. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[70]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Known maternal gradients are not sufficient for the establishment of gap domains in Drosophila melanogaster , 2007, Mechanisms of Development.

[71]  W. Bialek,et al.  Probing the Limits to Positional Information , 2007, Cell.

[72]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Fundamental Limits to Position Determination by Concentration Gradients , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[73]  John Reinitz,et al.  Master equation simulation analysis of immunostained Bicoid morphogen gradient , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[74]  W. Bialek,et al.  Stability and Nuclear Dynamics of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient , 2007, Cell.

[75]  Jaap A. Kaandorp,et al.  Efficient parameter estimation for spatio-temporal models of pattern formation: case study of Drosophila melanogaster , 2007, Bioinform..

[76]  Jingyuan Deng,et al.  Probing intrinsic properties of a robust morphogen gradient in Drosophila. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[77]  Manu,et al.  Characterization of the Drosophila segment determination morphome. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[78]  Johannes Jaeger,et al.  Parameter estimation and determinability analysis applied to Drosophila gap gene circuits , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[79]  R. Forman,et al.  Modeling the precision and robustness of Hunchback border during Drosophila embryonic development. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[80]  Jin Wang,et al.  Exact probabilistic solution of spatial-dependent stochastics and associated spatial potential landscape for the bicoid protein. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[81]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Canalization of Gene Expression and Domain Shifts in the Drosophila Blastoderm by Dynamical Attractors , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..