Prevalence and Characterization of Biallelic and Monoallelic NTHL1 and MSH3 Variant Carriers From a Pan-Cancer Patient Population

PURPOSE NTHL1 and MSH3 have been implicated as autosomal recessive cancer predisposition genes. Although individuals with biallelic NTHL1 and MSH3 pathogenic variants (PVs) have increased cancer and polyposis risk, risks for monoallelic carriers are uncertain. We sought to assess the prevalence and characterize NTHL1 and MSH3 from a large pan-cancer patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with pan-cancer (n = 11,081) underwent matched tumor-normal sequencing with consent for germline analysis. Medical records and tumors were reviewed and analyzed. Prevalence of PVs was compared with reference controls (Genome Aggregation Database). RESULTS NTHL1-PVs were identified in 40 patients including 39 monoallelic carriers (39/11,081 = 0.35%) and one with biallelic variants (1/11,081 = 0.009%) and a diagnosis of isolated early-onset breast cancer. NTHL1-associated mutational signature 30 was identified in the tumors of the biallelic patient and two carriers. Colonic polyposis was not identified in any NTHL1 patient. MSH3-PVs were identified in 13 patients, including 12 monoallelic carriers (12/11,081 = 0.11%) and one with biallelic MSH3 variants (1/11,081 = 0.009%) and diagnoses of later-onset cancers, attenuated polyposis, and abnormal MSH3-protein expression. Of the 12 MSH3 carriers, two had early-onset cancer diagnoses with tumor loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type MSH3 allele. Ancestry-specific burden tests demonstrated that NTHL1 and MSH3 prevalence was not significantly different in this pan-cancer population versus controls. CONCLUSION NTHL1 and MSH3 germline alterations were not enriched in this pan-cancer patient population. However, tumor-specific findings, such as mutational signature 30 and loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type allele, suggest the potential contribution of monoallelic variants to tumorigenesis in a subset of patients.

[1]  T. van Wezel,et al.  Monoallelic NTHL1 Loss-of-Function Variants and Risk of Polyposis and Colorectal Cancer , 2020, Gastroenterology.

[2]  A. Gerdes,et al.  A new family with a homozygous nonsense variant in NTHL1 further delineated the clinical phenotype of NTHL1-associated polyposis , 2019, Human Genome Variation.

[3]  Y. Chao,et al.  Combined Microsatellite Instability and Elevated Microsatellite Alterations at Selected Tetranucleotide Repeats (EMAST) Might Be a More Promising Immune Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer. , 2019, The oncologist.

[4]  V. Moreno,et al.  NTHL1 biallelic mutations seldom cause colorectal cancer, serrated polyposis or a multi-tumor phenotype, in absence of colorectal adenomas , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Beryl B. Cummings,et al.  Landscape of multi-nucleotide variants in 125,748 human exomes and 15,708 genomes , 2019, bioRxiv.

[6]  W. Foulkes,et al.  Mutational Signature Analysis Reveals NTHL1 Deficiency to Cause a Multi-tumor Phenotype. , 2019, Cancer cell.

[7]  Ryan L. Collins,et al.  The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans , 2020, Nature.

[8]  F. Fostira,et al.  Extending the clinical phenotype associated with biallelic NTHL1 germline mutations , 2018, Clinical genetics.

[9]  K. Offit,et al.  A counseling framework for moderate-penetrance colorectal cancer susceptibility genes , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[10]  S. Nik-Zainal,et al.  Use of CRISPR-modified human stem cell organoids to study the origin of mutational signatures in cancer , 2017, Science.

[11]  Ahmet Zehir,et al.  Reliable Pan-Cancer Microsatellite Instability Assessment by Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Data. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[12]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing , 2017, JAMA.

[13]  Donavan T. Cheng,et al.  Mutational Landscape of Metastatic Cancer Revealed from Prospective Clinical Sequencing of 10,000 Patients , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[14]  S. Beck,et al.  Validation of the MethylationEPIC BeadChip for fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours , 2017, Clinical Epigenetics.

[15]  V. Moreno,et al.  Delineating the Phenotypic Spectrum of the NTHL1‐Associated Polyposis , 2017, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[16]  W. Chung,et al.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics , 2016, Genetics in Medicine.

[17]  Timothy J. Peters,et al.  Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling , 2016, Genome Biology.

[18]  Aung Ko Win,et al.  Risk of extracolonic cancers for people with biallelic and monoallelic mutations in MUTYH , 2016, International journal of cancer.

[19]  M. Nöthen,et al.  Exome Sequencing Identifies Biallelic MSH3 Germline Mutations as a Recessive Subtype of Colorectal Adenomatous Polyposis. , 2016, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  P. Broderick,et al.  Rare disruptive mutations and their contribution to the heritable risk of colorectal cancer , 2016, Nature Communications.

[21]  V. Seshan,et al.  FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  J. Shendure,et al.  A germline homozygous mutation in the base-excision repair gene NTHL1 causes adenomatous polyposis and colorectal cancer , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[23]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  EMAST Is Associated with a Poor Prognosis in Microsatellite Instable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  J. Carethers,et al.  EMAST is a Form of Microsatellite Instability That is Initiated by Inflammation and Modulates Colorectal Cancer Progression , 2015, Genes.

[25]  A. Hartmann,et al.  Comprehensive screening for mutations associated with colorectal cancer in unselected cases reveals penetrant and nonpenetrant mutations , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[26]  Aung Ko Win,et al.  Risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of mutations in MUTYH, with and without a family history of cancer. , 2014, Gastroenterology.

[27]  Kai Ye,et al.  MSIsensor: microsatellite instability detection using paired tumor-normal sequence data , 2014, Bioinform..

[28]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[29]  W. Zheng,et al.  Genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence , 2013, Gut.

[30]  L. Lipton,et al.  Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Alison L. Livingston,et al.  Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C→T:A mutations in colorectal tumors , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[32]  Biallelic NTHL1 Mutations in a Woman with Multiple Primary Tumors. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.