Online Student Support Services: A Case Based on Quality Frameworks

Expansion of online teaching and learning has fostered the creation of numerous standards and frameworks to evaluate and promote quality in online instruction and learning. Review of these standards showed that there is consistency in indicators of quality for online programs. One indicator, student support, was selected for study. Quality frameworks were reviewed to determine if student support was included among the indicators. Then, to examine the inclusion of student support services within a realworld context, a case was selected for observation and illustration. Examination of the case showed that faculty and administrators had designed and were delivering critical student support services. Both new and existing support systems were needed and provided. This case indicated a primary need and provisions for student support in the following areas: admissions and registration, advising, orientation, learning support, scholarships and awards, library resources, computing and technology resources, articulation with other institutions, career placement, and communication.

[1]  I. Jung.  The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective , 2011 .

[2]  U. Ehlers.  Quality in e-Learning from a Learner’s Perspective , 2004, Distances et médiations des savoirs.

[3]  Salih Usun.  Learner Support Services in Distance Education System (A Case Study of Turkey) , 2004 .

[4]  Nancy Parker.  The QualiTy dilemma in online educaTion reViSiTed , 2011 .

[5]  Sibongile Simelane.  Success indicators in implementing technology-enhanced courses during a professional development programme , 2009 .

[6]  K. R. McKinnon,et al.  Benchmarking: a manual for Australian universities , 2000 .

[7]  B. Fraser,et al.  Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES) , 2005 .

[8]  Tim Hand,et al.  Enhancing Quality in Online Learning: Scaffolding Planning and Design Through Proactive Evaluation , 2002 .

[9]  Alistair Inglis,et al.  Delivering Digitally: Managing the Transition to the New Knowledge Media , 2002 .

[10]  Vincent Tinto.  Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research , 1975 .

[11]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[13]  Insung Jung,et al.  Asian Learners' Perception of Quality in Distance Education and Gender Differences. , 2012 .

[14]  Susan L. Miertschin,et al.  Online Tutoring Support Service For Stem , 2010 .

[15]  Barbara L. Stewart,et al.  Case study: collaborative creation of an on‐line degree program , 2006 .

[16]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Quality assurance in online education: The Universitas 21 Global approach , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Alistair Inglis,et al.  Approaches to the validation of quality frameworks for e‐learning , 2008 .

[18]  Sandra Frieden,et al.  Support services for distance education , 1999, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[19]  Susan K. Soy.  The Case Study as a Research Method , 2015 .

[20]  Susan L. Miertschin,et al.  Comprehensive Program Assessment: The Whys And Wherefores , 2004 .

[21]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[22]  Ronald A. Phipps,et al.  Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education. , 2000 .

[23]  Barbara L. Stewart,et al.  ON-LINE DELIVERY OF COURSES: WHAT COMPONENTS ARE IMPORTANT TO STUDENTS? , 2012 .

[24]  Janet C. Moore,et al.  The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework And The Five Pillars , 2005 .

[25]  Qi Wang,et al.  Quality Assurance – Best Practices for Assessing Online Programs , 2006 .