Hyperintense Plaque on Intracranial Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Artery-to-Artery Embolic Infarction

Background and Purpose— The aim of the present study was to investigate atherosclerotic plaque characteristics in patients with artery-to-artery (A-to-A) embolic infarction by whole-brain high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Methods— Seventy-four patients (mean age, 54.7±12.1 years; 59 men) with recent stroke in the territory of middle cerebral artery because of intracranial atherosclerotic disease were prospectively enrolled. Whole-brain high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all the patients both precontrast and postcontrast administration by using a 3-dimensional T1-weighted vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging technique known as inversion-recovery prepared sampling perfection with application-optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions. Patients were divided into A-to-A embolic infarction and non–A-to-A embolic infarction groups based on diffusion-weighted imaging findings. The characteristics of the intracranial atherosclerotic plaques were compared between groups. Results— A total of 74 intracranial atherosclerotic plaques were analyzed (36 in A-to-A embolism group and 38 in non–A-to-A embolism group). Hyperintense plaques (HIPs) were more frequently observed in A-to-A embolism group (75.0% versus 21.1%; P<0.001). Eighteen of the 27 HIPs (66.7%) demonstrated hyperintense spots or areas located adjacent to the lumen versus 9 HIPs (33.3%) located within the plaque in A-to-A embolism group. Furthermore, a higher prevalence of plaque surface irregularity was also observed in A-to-A embolism group (41.7% versus 18.4%; P=0.029). Logistic regression analysis showed that HIP was the most powerful independent predictor of A-to-A embolic infarction (P<0.001), with the odds ratio of 11.2 (95% confidence interval, 3.5–36.2). Conclusions— A-to-A embolic infarction has distinct vulnerable plaque characteristics compared with non–A-to-A embolic infarction. HIP and plaque surface irregularity may predict A-to-A embolic infarction.

[1]  Y. Xing,et al.  Compensatory remodeling in symptomatic middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis: a high-resolution MRI and microemboli monitoring study , 2012, Neurological research.

[2]  O. Bang.  Intracranial Atherosclerosis: Current Understanding and Perspectives , 2014, Journal of stroke.

[3]  P. Börnert,et al.  Joint blood and cerebrospinal fluid suppression for intracranial vessel wall MRI , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Debiao Li,et al.  Whole‐brain intracranial vessel wall imaging at 3 Tesla using cerebrospinal fluid–attenuated T1‐weighted 3D turbo spin echo , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Multiple acute stroke syndrome , 2000, Neurology.

[6]  Peter R Luijten,et al.  Imaging Intracranial Vessel Wall Pathology With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Prospects and Future Directions , 2014, Circulation.

[7]  D. Mikulis,et al.  Vessel Wall MRI to Differentiate Between Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome and Central Nervous System Vasculitis: Preliminary Results , 2012, Stroke.

[8]  Debiao Li,et al.  Whole‐brain vessel wall MRI: A parameter tune‐up solution to improve the scan efficiency of three‐dimensional variable flip‐angle turbo spin‐echo , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Zheng-yu Jin,et al.  In vivo high-resolution MR imaging of symptomatic and asymptomatic middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis. , 2010, Atherosclerosis.

[10]  W S Kerwin,et al.  Differentiation of Intraplaque Versus Juxtaluminal Hemorrhage/Thrombus in Advanced Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Lesions by In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Circulation.

[11]  Eccentric narrowing and enhancement of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenoses in patients with recent ischemic stroke. , 2011, Archives of neurology.

[12]  David Saloner,et al.  Major carotid plaque surface irregularities correlate with neurologic symptoms. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  C. Sohn,et al.  Middle cerebral artery plaque and prediction of the infarction pattern. , 2012, Archives of neurology.

[14]  Ji Hoe Heo,et al.  Middle cerebral artery stenosis is a major clinical determinant in striatocapsular small, deep infarction. , 2002, Archives of neurology.

[15]  Gong Yong Jin,et al.  High resolution MR imaging in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[16]  J. Cha,et al.  Differential Vascular Pathophysiologic Types of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stroke: A High-Resolution Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2015, Stroke.

[17]  S. Kwon,et al.  Lesion Patterns and Stroke Mechanism in Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Disease: Early Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Study , 2005, Stroke.

[18]  E. Feldmann,et al.  Chinese‐white differences in the distribution of occlusive cerebrovascular disease , 1990, Neurology.

[19]  Ye Qiao,et al.  Intracranial plaque enhancement in patients with cerebrovascular events on high-spatial-resolution MR images. , 2014, Radiology.

[20]  G. Adam,et al.  Multicontrast-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla: ex-vivo comparison with histopathologic correlation , 2006, European Radiology.

[21]  K. Furie,et al.  An evidence‐based causative classification system for acute ischemic stroke , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[22]  K. Node,et al.  High-intensity signals in coronary plaques on noncontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a novel determinant of coronary events. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  F. Moll,et al.  Cerebral Ischemic Disease and Morphometric Analyses of Carotid Plaques , 1999, Annals of vascular surgery.

[24]  Michael Schär,et al.  Intracranial arterial wall imaging using three‐dimensional high isotropic resolution black blood MRI at 3.0 Tesla , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  Ming Yang,et al.  Wall characteristics and mechanisms of ischaemic stroke in patients with atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery stenosis: a high-resolution MRI study , 2016, Neurological research.

[26]  D J Mikulis,et al.  Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI: Principles and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[27]  Young-Jun Lee,et al.  The advantage of high-resolution MRI in evaluating basilar plaques: a comparison study with MRA. , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[28]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Mechanisms of acute cerebral infarctions in patients with middle cerebral artery stenosis: A diffusion‐weighted imaging and microemboli monitoring study , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[29]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Carotid plaque morphology and clinical events. , 1997, Stroke.

[30]  Aloke V. Finn,et al.  Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression and Vulnerability to Rupture: Angiogenesis as a Source of Intraplaque Hemorrhage , 2005, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[31]  Zheng-yu Jin,et al.  Middle cerebral artery intraplaque hemorrhage: Prevalence and Clinical Relevance , 2012, Annals of neurology.

[32]  P. Morgan,et al.  Intraplaque Hemorrhage in Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease , 2011, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.