SŌTO: An Android Platform with a Masculine Appearance for Social Touch Interaction

In this paper, we report an android platform with a masculine appearance. In the human-human interaction research field, several studies reported the effects of gender in the social touch context. However, in the human-robot interaction research field, gender effects are mainly focused on human genders, i.e., a robot's perceived gender is less focused. The purpose of developing the android is to investigate gender effects in social touch in the context of the human-robot interaction, comparing to existing android platforms with feminine appearances. For this purpose, we prepared a nonexistent face design in order to avoid appearance effects and fabric-based capacitance type upper-body touch sensors.

[1]  Takashi Minato,et al.  Does a Robot's Subtle Pause in Reaction Time to People's Touch Contribute to Positive Influences? * , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[2]  Tatsuya Kawahara,et al.  ERICA: The ERATO Intelligent Conversational Android , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[3]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  An Interaction Design Framework for Social Robots , 2011, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[4]  Christine Williams,et al.  Effects of Touch on Gratuities Received in Same‐Gender and Cross‐Gender Dyads1 , 2003 .

[5]  Joan A Evans,et al.  Cautious caregivers: gender stereotypes and the sexualization of men nurses' touch. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  At the Theater—Possibilities of Androids as Poetry-Reciting Agents , 2018 .

[7]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Gender Differences in Touch: An Empirical and Theoretical Review , 1984 .

[8]  Takashi Minato,et al.  What Kinds of Robot's Touch Will Match Expressed Emotions? , 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[9]  Takashi Minato,et al.  Subtle Reaction and Response Time Effects in Human-Robot Touch Interaction , 2017, ICSR.

[10]  Daisuke Sakamoto,et al.  GEMINOID: REMOTE-CONTROLLED ANDROID SYSTEM FOR STUDYING HUMAN PRESENCE , 2009 .

[11]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Android as a telecommunication medium with a human-like presence , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  How people perceive different robot types: A direct comparison of an android, humanoid, and non-biomimetic robot , 2016, 2016 8th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST).

[13]  Takashi Minato,et al.  How Should a Robot React Before People's Touch?: Modeling a Pre-Touch Reaction Distance for a Robot's Face , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[14]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[15]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  At the Department Store—Can Androids Be Salespeople in the Real World? , 2018 .