Quantifying the Performance of Micro-Compartmentalized Directed Evolution Protocols

High-throughput, in vitro approaches for the evolution of enzymes rely on a random micro-encapsulation to link phenotypes to genotypes, followed by screening or selection steps. In order to optimise these approaches, or compare one to another, one needs a measure of their performance at extracting the best variants of a library. Here, we introduce a new metric, the Selection Quality Index (SQI), which can be computed from a simple mock experiment, performed with a known initial fraction of active variants. In contrast to previous approaches, our index integrates the effect of random co-encapsulation, and comes with a straightforward experimental interpretation. We further show how this new metric can be used to extract general protocol efficiency trends or reveal hidden selection mechanisms such as a counterintuitive form of beneficial poisoning in the compartmentalized self-replication protocol.

[1]  Hiroyuki Fujita,et al.  Microfabricated arrays of femtoliter chambers allow single molecule enzymology , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  L. Gold,et al.  Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. , 1990, Science.

[3]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  A S Zadorin,et al.  Natural selection in compartmentalized environment with reshuffling. , 2019, Journal of mathematical biology.

[5]  A. deMello,et al.  The Poisson distribution and beyond: methods for microfluidic droplet production and single cell encapsulation. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[6]  A. van den Berg,et al.  High-yield cell ordering and deterministic cell-in-droplet encapsulation using Dean flow in a curved microchannel. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[7]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Skirgaila,et al.  In vitro evolution of phi29 DNA polymerase using isothermal compartmentalized self replication technique. , 2016, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[9]  F. Arnold,et al.  Tuning the activity of an enzyme for unusual environments: sequential random mutagenesis of subtilisin E for catalysis in dimethylformamide. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Tetsuya Yomo,et al.  Evolvability of random polypeptides through functional selection within a small library. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[11]  John C. Chaput,et al.  Synthetic Genetic Polymers Capable of Heredity and Evolution , 2012, Science.

[12]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  Directed Evolution: Bringing New Chemistry to Life , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  Andrew D. Ellington,et al.  Directed evolution of genetic parts and circuits by compartmentalized partnered replication , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Yannick Rondelez,et al.  Selection strategies for randomly partitioned genetic replicators. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[15]  Andrew D Griffiths,et al.  CotA laccase: high-throughput manipulation and analysis of recombinant enzyme libraries expressed in E. coli using droplet-based microfluidics. , 2014, The Analyst.

[16]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Directed enzyme evolution : screening and selection methods , 2003 .

[17]  J. Szostak,et al.  In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands , 1990, Nature.

[18]  Andrew D Griffiths,et al.  A completely in vitro ultrahigh-throughput droplet-based microfluidic screening system for protein engineering and directed evolution. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[19]  Cathleen Zeymer,et al.  Directed Evolution of Protein Catalysts. , 2018, Annual review of biochemistry.

[20]  Babatunde A. Ogunnaike,et al.  Statistics of droplet sizes generated by a microfluidic device , 2016 .

[21]  Jennifer L. Ong,et al.  Directed evolution of polymerase function by compartmentalized self-replication , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Fabienne Courtois,et al.  Picoliter cell lysate assays in microfluidic droplet compartments for directed enzyme evolution. , 2012, Chemistry & biology.

[23]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Controlled encapsulation of single-cells into monodisperse picolitre drops. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[24]  M. Kermekchiev,et al.  Mutants of Taq DNA polymerase resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  D. Weitz,et al.  Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[26]  A. Abate,et al.  Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics for directed evolution , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Florian Hollfelder,et al.  Enzyme engineering in biomimetic compartments. , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[28]  H Klenow,et al.  Selective elimination of the exonuclease activity of the deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase from Escherichia coli B by limited proteolysis. , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Directed evolution of an extremely fast phosphotriesterase by in vitro compartmentalization , 2003, The EMBO journal.