Mega-Enhancer Bodies Organize Neuronal Long Genes in the Cerebellum

Dynamic regulation of gene expression plays a key role in establishing the diverse neuronal cell types in the brain. Recent findings in genome biology suggest that three-dimensional (3D) genome organization has important, but mechanistically poorly understood functions in gene transcription. Beyond local genomic interactions between promoters and enhancers, we find that cerebellar granule neurons undergoing differentiation in vivo exhibit striking increases in long-distance genomic interactions between transcriptionally active genomic loci, which are separated by tens of megabases within a chromosome or located on different chromosomes. Among these interactions, we identify a nuclear subcompartment enriched for near-megabase long enhancers and their associated neuronal long genes encoding synaptic or signaling proteins. Neuronal long genes are differentially recruited to this enhancer-dense subcompartment to help shape the transcriptional identities of granule neuron subtypes in the cerebellum. SPRITE analyses of higher-order genomic interactions, together with IGM-based 3D genome modeling and imaging approaches, reveal that the enhancer-dense subcompartment forms prominent nuclear structures, which we term mega-enhancer bodies. These novel nuclear bodies reside in the nuclear periphery, away from other transcriptionally active structures, including nuclear speckles located in the nuclear interior. Together, our findings define additional layers of higher-order 3D genome organization closely linked to neuronal maturation and identity in the brain.

[1]  M. Guttman,et al.  3D genome organization around nuclear speckles drives mRNA splicing efficiency , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  J. Broach,et al.  Subtype-specific 3D genome alteration in acute myeloid leukaemia , 2022, Nature.

[3]  Mariano Barbieri,et al.  Enhancer–promoter contact formation requires RNAPII and antagonizes loop extrusion , 2022, bioRxiv.

[4]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  BRD2 Compartmentalizes the Accessible Genome , 2022, Nature Genetics.

[5]  Wenyuan Li,et al.  Population-based structure modeling reveals key roles of nuclear microenviroment in gene functions , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  Aleksandra A. Kolodziejczyk,et al.  Cell-type specialization is encoded by specific chromatin topologies , 2021, Nature.

[7]  D. Gifford,et al.  An expansion of the non-coding genome and its regulatory potential underlies vertebrate neuronal diversity , 2021, Neuron.

[8]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Peer Review File Manuscript Title: A transcriptomic atlas of mouse cerebellar cortex reveals novel cell types Editorial Notes: Reviewer Comments & Author Rebuttals , 2020 .

[9]  L. Cai,et al.  Single-cell nuclear architecture across cell types in the mouse brain , 2021, Science.

[10]  X. Zhou,et al.  Integrative genome modeling platform reveals essentiality of rare contact events in 3D genome organizations , 2021, Nature Methods.

[11]  C. Sette,et al.  Transcriptome programs involved in the development and structure of the cerebellum , 2021, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[12]  A. Pombo,et al.  Comparison of the Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE methods using polymer models of chromatin , 2021, Nature Methods.

[13]  X. Xie,et al.  Changes in genome architecture and transcriptional dynamics progress independently of sensory experience during post-natal brain development , 2021, Cell.

[14]  M. Guttman,et al.  Integrated spatial genomics reveals global architecture of single nuclei , 2020, Nature.

[15]  D. Higgs,et al.  The relationship between genome structure and function , 2020, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  Raphael Gottardo,et al.  Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data , 2020, Cell.

[17]  Jesse M. Platt,et al.  MeCP2 links heterochromatin condensates and neurodevelopmental disease , 2020, Nature.

[18]  Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins,et al.  Three-dimensional genome restructuring across timescales of activity-induced neuronal gene expression , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  L. Mirny,et al.  Spatial organization of transcribed eukaryotic genes , 2020, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  Jian Ma,et al.  Probing multi-way chromatin interaction with hypergraph representation learning , 2020, bioRxiv.

[21]  Liqun Luo,et al.  Neocortex–Cerebellum Circuits for Cognitive Processing , 2019, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  A. West,et al.  Neurobiological functions of transcriptional enhancers , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Ivry,et al.  Functional boundaries in the human cerebellum revealed by a multi-domain task battery , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  T. Holy,et al.  Sensory Experience Remodels Genome Architecture in Neural Circuit to Drive Motor Learning , 2019, Nature.

[25]  J. Saylor,et al.  Characterizing sediment sources by non-negative matrix factorization of detrital geochronological data , 2019, Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

[26]  X. Xie,et al.  Three-dimensional genome structures of single sensory neurons in mouse visual and olfactory systems , 2019, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[27]  Andrew J. Hill,et al.  The single cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis , 2019, Nature.

[28]  S. Lomvardas,et al.  LHX2- and LDB1-mediated trans interactions regulate olfactory receptor choice , 2019, Nature.

[29]  N. Hannett,et al.  Transcription Factors Activate Genes through the Phase-Separation Capacity of Their Activation Domains , 2018, Cell.

[30]  Michael E. Greenberg,et al.  Activity-Regulated Transcription: Bridging the Gap between Neural Activity and Behavior , 2018, Neuron.

[31]  Daniel S. Day,et al.  Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control , 2018, Science.

[32]  B. Tabak,et al.  Higher-Order Inter-chromosomal Hubs Shape 3D Genome Organization in the Nucleus , 2018, Cell.

[33]  Nan Hua,et al.  Producing genome structure populations with the dynamic and automated PGS software , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[34]  A. Tanay,et al.  Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development , 2017, Cell.

[35]  Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al.  Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains , 2017, Cell.

[36]  W. Krzyzosiak,et al.  SURVEY AND SUMMARY Nuclear speckles: molecular organization, biological function and role in disease , 2017 .

[37]  Stavros Lomvardas,et al.  Cooperative interactions enable singular olfactory receptor expression in mouse olfactory neurons , 2017, bioRxiv.

[38]  S. Q. Xie,et al.  Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM) , 2017, Nature.

[39]  Frank Alber,et al.  Comprehensive characterization of neutrophil genome topology , 2017, bioRxiv.

[40]  R. W. Turner,et al.  Long-Term Potentiation at the Mossy Fiber–Granule Cell Relay Invokes Postsynaptic Second-Messenger Regulation of Kv4 Channels , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Shane A. Heiney,et al.  Chromatin remodeling inactivates activity genes and regulates neural coding , 2016, Science.

[42]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  Juicer Provides a One-Click System for Analyzing Loop-Resolution Hi-C Experiments. , 2016, Cell systems.

[43]  Charles H. Yoon,et al.  Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq , 2016, Science.

[44]  M. L. Le Gros,et al.  Population-based 3D genome structure analysis reveals driving forces in spatial genome organization , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Jean-Philippe Vert,et al.  HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing , 2015, Genome Biology.

[46]  D. Geschwind,et al.  Gene hunting in autism spectrum disorder: on the path to precision medicine , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[47]  Chris I De Zeeuw,et al.  Regional functionality of the cerebellum , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[48]  Nathan C. Sheffield,et al.  ChIPmentation: fast, robust, low-input ChIP-seq for histones and transcription factors , 2015, Nature Methods.

[49]  Jae-Ran Lee Protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPRT as a regulator of synaptic formation and neuronal development , 2015, BMB reports.

[50]  J. Simon,et al.  Gene Length Matters in Neurons , 2015, Neuron.

[51]  C. D. De Zeeuw,et al.  In Vivo Differences in Inputs and Spiking Between Neurons in Lobules VI/VII of Neocerebellum and Lobule X of Archaeocerebellum , 2015, The Cerebellum.

[52]  Harrison W. Gabel,et al.  Disruption of DNA methylation-dependent long gene repression in Rett syndrome , 2015, Nature.

[53]  Nenad Sestan,et al.  From trans to cis: transcriptional regulatory networks in neocortical development. , 2015, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[54]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[55]  W. Regehr,et al.  Promoter Decommissioning by the NuRD Chromatin Remodeling Complex Triggers Synaptic Connectivity in the Mammalian Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[56]  R. W. Turner,et al.  The Expression Pattern of a Cav3–Kv4 Complex Differentially Regulates Spike Output in Cerebellar Granule Cells , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Ty C. Voss,et al.  Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[58]  R. Young,et al.  Super-Enhancers in the Control of Cell Identity and Disease , 2013, Cell.

[59]  Christel Krueger,et al.  Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[60]  T. Owen-Hughes,et al.  Mechanisms and Functions of ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling Enzymes , 2013, Cell.

[61]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.

[62]  L. Mirny,et al.  Iterative Correction of Hi-C Data Reveals Hallmarks of Chromosome Organization , 2012, Nature Methods.

[63]  Vikki M. Weake,et al.  Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[64]  Davis J. McCarthy,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[65]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[66]  Richard Axel,et al.  Interchromosomal Interactions and Olfactory Receptor Choice , 2006, Cell.

[67]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[68]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.