Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system

Abstract. Ratio-dependent predator–prey models are favored by many animal ecologists recently as more suitable ones for predator–prey interactions where predation involves searching process. However, such models are not well studied in the sense that most results are local stability related. In this paper, we consider the global behaviors of solutions of a ratio-dependent predator–prey systems. Specifically, we shall show that ratio dependent predator–prey models are rich in boundary dynamics, and most importantly, we shall show that if the positive steady state of the so-called Michaelis–Menten ratio-dependent predator–prey system is locally asymptotically stable, then the system has no nontrivial positive periodic solutions. We also give sufficient conditions for each of the possible three steady states to be globally asymptotically stable. We note that for ratio-dependent systems, in general, local asymptotic stability of the positive steady state does not even guarantee the so-called persistence of the system, and therefore does not imply global asymptotic stability. To show that the system has no nontrivial positive periodic solutions. we employ the so-called divergency criterion for the stability of limit cycles in planar systems and some critical transformations.

[1]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Uniqueness of limit cycles in Gause-type models of predator-prey systems , 1988 .

[2]  Alan A. Berryman,et al.  The Orgins and Evolution of Predator‐Prey Theory , 1992 .

[3]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  Global Stability for a Class of Predator-Prey Systems , 1995, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[4]  R. Arditi,et al.  Functional responses and heterogeneities: an experimental test with cladocerans , 1991 .

[5]  R. Arditi,et al.  Empirical Evidence of the Role of Heterogeneity in Ratio‐Dependent Consumption , 1993 .

[6]  M. Rosenzweig Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[7]  Y. Kuang Nonuniqueness of Limit Cycles of Gause-Type Predator-Prey Systems , 1988 .

[8]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Consequences of Ratio‐Dependent Predation for Steady‐State Properties of Ecosystems , 1992 .

[9]  R Arditi,et al.  The biological control paradox. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Convergence Results in a Well-Known Delayed Predator-Prey System , 1996 .

[11]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  Coexistence of competing predators in a chemostat , 1983 .

[12]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Population Dynamics: a per capita Resource Approach , 1984 .

[13]  H. I. Freedman Deterministic mathematical models in population ecology , 1982 .

[14]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Global Stability in Delay Differential Systems without Dominating Instantaneous Negative Feedbacks , 1995 .

[16]  S. Jørgensen Models in Ecology , 1975 .

[17]  Robert M. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  Robert F. Luck,et al.  Evaluation of natural enemies for biological control: A behavioral approach , 1990 .

[19]  R. Arditi,et al.  Variation in Plankton Densities Among Lakes: A Case for Ratio-Dependent Predation Models , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Y. Kuang,et al.  Global analyses in some delayed ratio-dependent predator-prey systems , 1998 .

[21]  R. Arditi,et al.  Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .

[22]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Global stability of Gause-type predator-prey systems , 1990 .