Blocking and nonsimultaneous compounds: Comparison of responding during compound conditioning and testing

Three blocking experiments were run using a conditional emotional response procedure with rats as subjects. In each experiment, following initial conditioning to a light stimulus, blocking rats were conditioned to a compound in which a short-duration (30-second) noise was superimposed on the terminal portion of the longer-duration light. In Experiment 1, the light was always three minutes in duration; in Experiment 2, the light was switched from a constant (three-minute) to a variable (0.5–5.0 minute) duration at the start of compound conditioning; in Experiment 3, the light was variable in duration throughout conditioning. Control rats received the same compound conditioning experiences as the blocking rats but did not receive prior conditioning to the light by itself. These temporal manipulations had strong and systematic influence on the rats’ pattern of responding during compound conditioning. Most notably, experience with a constantduration light resulted in both blocking and compound animals showing little conditional suppression to the early conditional stimulus portion of light by itself, followed by strong conditional suppression to the terminal 30 seconds of light plus noise. When testing was done with the noise in isolation subsequent to compound conditioning, however, an equally strong blocking effect was obtained across all the temporal manipulations. In all cases, the blocking animals showed much less conditional suppression to the noise than did the compound control animals. This lack of correspondence between the rats’ responding during compound conditioning and their response to the noise by itself is theoretically puzzling. The confounding effect of inhibition of delay may provide at least a partial explanation of this pattern of results.