A new approach for modelling variability in residential construction projects

The construction industry is plagued by long cycle times caused by variability in the supply chain. Variations or undesirable situations are the result of factors such as non-standard practices, work site accidents, inclement weather conditions and faults in design. This paper uses a new approach for modelling variability in construction by linking relative variability indicators to processes. Mass homebuilding sector was chosen as the scope of the analysis because data is readily available. Numerous simulation experiments were designed by varying size of capacity buffers in front of trade contractors, availability of trade contractors, and level of variability in homebuilding processes. The measurements were shown to lead to an accurate determination of relationships between these factors and production parameters. The variability indicator was found to dramatically affect the tangible performance measures such as home completion rates. This study provides for future analysis of the production homebuilding sector, which may lead to improvements in performance and a faster product delivery to homebuyers.

[1]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Improving construction productivity: implications of even flow production principles , 2013 .

[2]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Project understanding, planning, flexibility of management action and construction time performance: two Australian case studies , 2002 .

[3]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Valuing the contribution of knowledge-oriented workers to projects: a merit based approach in the construction industry , 2012 .

[4]  P. Moyal.  The queue with impatience: construction of the stationary workload under FIFO , 2010, Journal of Applied Probability.

[5]  Fah Choy Chia,et al.  An analysis of construction productivity in Malaysia , 2012 .

[6]  Robert W. Veryzer.  The Roles of Marketing and Industrial Design in Discontinuous New Product Development , 2005 .

[7]  Howard H. Bashford,et al.  Impact of Inspected Buffers on Production Parameters of Construction Processes , 2009 .

[8]  Makarand Hastak,et al.  Internal relationship modeling and production planning optimization for the manufactured housing , 2011 .

[9]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  A collaborative perspective in green construction risk management , 2012 .

[10]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Is production outside management? , 2012 .

[11]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Site Management of Work-in-Process Buffers to Enhance Project Performance Using the Reliable Commitment Model: Case Study , 2011 .

[12]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Implications of Even Flow Production Methodology for U.S. Housing Industry , 2003 .

[13]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  MULTIPLE DEVICE COLLABORATIVE AND REAL TIME ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN CIVIL ENGINEERING , 2002 .

[14]  Uskali Mäki.  The Methodology of Positive Economics , 2009 .

[15]  M. Friedman,et al.  The Methodology of Positive Economics , 2010 .

[16]  Howard H. Bashford,et al.  Production Equations for Unsteady-State Construction Processes , 2007 .

[17]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Improved subcontractor selection employing partnering principles , 2000 .

[18]  James A. Powell,et al.  AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON THE APPLICABILITY OF PROCESS TRANSPARENCY IN CONSTRUCTION SITES , 2002 .

[19]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Introduction to "Little's Law as Viewed on Its 50th Anniversary" , 2011, Oper. Res..

[20]  Ehsan Eshtehardian,et al.  Multi-mode resource-constrained discrete time–cost-resource optimization in project scheduling using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm , 2013 .

[21]  Daniel W. Halpin,et al.  Design of construction and process operations , 1976 .

[22]  D. Greenwood.  Subcontract procurement: are relationships changing? , 2001 .

[23]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  Optimizing construction planning schedules by virtual prototyping enabled resource analysis , 2009 .

[24]  Julio C. Martinez.  Methodology for Conducting Discrete-Event Simulation Studies in Construction Engineering and Management , 2010 .

[25]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Visualisation in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) , 2005 .

[26]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question? , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[27]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Mitigating the Impact of Disruptions in Supply Chains , 2011 .

[28]  Tony Dalton.  Australian suburban house building: industry organisation, practices and constraints - final report , 2011 .

[29]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Role of simulation in construction processes - Harmony in capturing resources , 2012 .

[30]  Lars Stehn,et al.  Applicability of lean principles and practices in industrialized housing production , 2008 .

[31]  Eric Henry.  Quality management standardization in the French construction industry: singularities and internationalization prospects , 2000 .

[32]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Gaining the best value from HR in construction companies , 2010 .

[33]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Cost of Risk Transfer: Pricing Agreements in Residential Supply Chains , 2004 .

[34]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Production System Loading-Cycle Time Relationship in Residential Construction , 2005 .

[35]  Vineet R. Kamat,et al.  Software mechanisms for extensible and scalable 3D visualization of construction operations , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[36]  Ron Wakefield,et al.  Concrete prefabricated housing via advances in systems technologies: development of a technology roadmap , 2010 .