Communication, concepts and grounding

This article discusses the relation between communication and conceptual grounding. In the brain, neurons, circuits and brain areas are involved in the representation of a concept, grounding it in perception and action. In terms of grounding we can distinguish between communication within the brain and communication between humans or between humans and machines. In the first form of communication, a concept is activated by sensory input. Due to grounding, the information provided by this communication is not just determined by the sensory input but also by the outgoing connection structure of the conceptual representation, which is based on previous experiences and actions. The second form of communication, that between humans or between humans and machines, is influenced by the first form. In particular, a more successful interpersonal communication might require forms of situated cognition and interaction in which the entire representations of grounded concepts are involved.

[1]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[2]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science , 1984 .

[4]  F. Velde,et al.  Compositional connectionist structures based on in situ grounded representations , 2011, Connect. Sci..

[5]  Les Carr,et al.  Offloading Cognition onto the Web , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[6]  S. Scott,et al.  The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  L. Squire,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  R. Quiroga Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  V. Braitenberg Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[10]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Listening to Action-related Sentences Activates Fronto-parietal Motor Circuits , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind , 1998 .

[12]  Stephen Potter,et al.  I-Room: A Virtual Space for Intelligent Interaction , 2010, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[13]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. , 1991, Science.

[14]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Computational Grounded Cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[15]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[16]  F. van der Velde,et al.  Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition , 2006, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Murray Shanahan,et al.  Embodiment and the inner lifeCognition and Consciousness in the Space of Possible Minds , 2010 .

[18]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Walking or Talking?: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing , 2001, Brain and Language.

[19]  Sandra Blakeslee,et al.  Phantoms in the Brain , 1998 .

[20]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[21]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from Neuropsychology , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[22]  Frank van der Velde,et al.  Learning of control in a neural architecture of grounded language processing , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[23]  Stevan Harnad The Symbol Grounding Problem , 1999, ArXiv.