Bilateral Teleoperation of Groups of UAVs with Decentralized Connectivity Maintenance

In this paper, we present a decentralized passivity-based control strategy for the bilateral teleoperation of a group of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The human operator at the master side can command the group motion and receive suitable force cues informative about the remote environment. By properly controlling the energy exchanged within the slave side (the UAV group), we guarantee that the connectivity of the group is preserved and we prevent inter-agent and obstacle collisions. At the same time, we allow the behavior of the UAVs to be as flexible as possible with arbitrary split and join maneuvers. The results of the paper are validated by means of human/hardwarein- the-loop (HHIL) simulations.

[1]  Dongjun Lee,et al.  Passive-Set-Position-Modulation Framework for Interactive Robotic Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[2]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Control of Interactive Robotic Interfaces: A Port-Hamiltonian Approach (Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics) , 2007 .

[3]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Distributed Coordination Control of Multiagent Systems While Preserving Connectedness , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Stability and performance tradeoffs in bi-lateral telemanipulation , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Tarek Hamel,et al.  Control Laws For The Tele Operation Of An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Known As An X4-flyer , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Potential Fields for Maintaining Connectivity of Mobile Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[7]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Telemanipulation with Time Delays , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  A novel approach to haptic tele-operation of aerial robot vehicles , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Recent Research in Cooperative Control of Multivehicle Systems , 2007 .

[10]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Modeling and control of cooperative teleoperation systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Dusan M. Stipanovic,et al.  Bilateral Teleoperation of Multiple Mobile Agents: Coordinated Motion and Collision Avoidance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[12]  Yongcan Cao,et al.  Distributed coordinated tracking via a variable structure approach - part I: Consensus tracking , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[13]  Giuseppe Notarstefano,et al.  Maintaining limited-range connectivity among second-order agents , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[14]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  A passivity-based decentralized approach for the bilateral teleoperation of a group of UAVs with switching topology , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Virtual leaders, artificial potentials and coordinated control of groups , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[16]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Position Drift Compensation in Port-Hamiltonian Based Telemanipulation , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Experiments of passivity-based bilateral aerial teleoperation of a group of UAVs with decentralized velocity synchronization , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Decentralized estimation and control of graph connectivity in mobile sensor networks , 2008, ACC.