Diel migration dynamics of an island-associated sound-scattering layer

The Hawaiian mesopelagic boundary community, consisting ofisland-associated, midwater sound-scattering layers, undergoes diel migrations with both vertical and horizontal components. To understand the dynamics ofthe community’s migration at fine temporal scales, we utilized a bottom-mounted, 200-kHz active-acoustic mooring that transmitted 10 signals every 15 min, from dusk until dawn for 5 days. Five moorings were deployed 1.0–3.0 km from the leeward coast ofOahu in 0.5 km intervals. Two layers within the boundary community were observed to undergo simultaneous diel vertical and horizontal migration. The shallow layer came within 10 m ofthe surface and 1 km ofthe shoreline. The deeper layer remained 90 m from the surface and 2.5 km of the shoreline. Vertical migration rates were measured at 0–1.7 m min –1 while the horizontal rate averaged 1.7 km h –1 , swamping the vertical movement. The turning point ofthe migration pattern was observed 45 min bef ore the midpoint between sunset and sunrise. Until the migration’s turning point, scattering strength increased relatively constantly as the animals migrated towards shore, with the highest scattering densities found in the shallowest areas at midnight. Total scattering strength measured at the leading and trailing edge ofthe layer support the hypothesis that increased animal densities nearshore are related to packing as mesopelagic animals avoid the surface and the bottom. We observed high levels of biomass moving rapidly, over a great distance, into shallow waters very close to shore providing insight into the significant link the mesopelagic boundary community provides between nearshore and oceanic systems. r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Richard Webster,et al.  Automatic soil-boundary location from transect data , 1973 .

[2]  J. Ringelberg.  Changes in Light Intensity and Diel Vertical Migration: a Comparison of Marine and Freshwater Environments , 1995, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[3]  Richard Young.  Oceanic bioluminescence: an overview of general functions , 1983 .

[4]  B. Würsig,et al.  The Hawaiian Spinner Dolphin , 1994 .

[5]  D. Cushing,et al.  The ecology of the seas , 1978 .

[6]  D. Cowles.  Swimming Speed and Metabolic Rate during Routine Swimming and Simulated Diel Vertical Migration of Sergestes similis in the Laboratory , 2001 .

[7]  Xi He,et al.  Cluster analysis of longline sets and fishing strategies within the Hawaii-based fishery , 1997 .

[8]  Whitlow W. L. Au,et al.  Target strength measurements of Hawaiian mesopelagic boundary community animals , 2001 .

[9]  W. Pearcy,et al.  Acoustical patchiness of mesopelagic micronekton , 1985 .

[10]  W. Au,et al.  Energy: converting from acoustic to biological resource units. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  W. Au,et al.  Diel horizontal migration of the Hawaiian mesopelagic boundary community observed acoustically , 2001 .

[12]  K. S. Norris,et al.  Behavior of the Hawaiian Spinner Dolphin 'Stenella longirostris' (Schlegel, 1841). , 1979 .

[13]  Madoka Sasaki.  OBSERVATIONS ON HOTARU-IKA WATASENIA SCINTILLANS , 1914 .

[14]  J. Hirota,et al.  Mesopelagic-boundary community in Hawaii: Micronekton at the interface between neritic and oceanic ecosystems , 1991 .

[15]  J. Isaacs,et al.  Migrant Sound Scatterers: Interaction with the Sea Floor , 1965, Science.

[16]  N. Merrett,et al.  Midwater fishes in the eastern North Atlantic—I. Vertical distribution and associated biology in 30°N, 23°W, with developmental notes on certain myctophids , 1976 .

[17]  T. Lamb,et al.  Biomass of zooplankton and micronekton in the southern bluefin tuna fishing grounds off eastern Tasmania, Australia , 1996 .

[18]  William G. Pearcy,et al.  Vertical distribution and migration of oceanic micronekton off Oregon , 1977 .

[19]  V. C. Sambilay,et al.  Interrelationships between swimming speed, caudal fin aspect ratio and body length of fishes , 1990 .

[20]  W. Au,et al.  Prey dynamics affect foraging by a pelagic predator (Stenella longirostris) over a range of spatial and temporal scales , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  Dag L. Aksnes,et al.  Winter distribution and migration of the sound scattering layers, zooplankton and micronekton in Masfjorden, western Norway , 1993 .

[22]  R. Bainbridge,et al.  Light As an Ecological Factor, II: The 16th Symposium of the British Ecological Society, 26-28 March, 1974 , 1976 .

[23]  J. Koslow,et al.  Species composition, biomass and vertical distribution of micronekton over the mid-slope region off southern Tasmania, Australia , 1997 .

[24]  Jakob Gj∅saeter.  Mesopelagic fish, a large potential resource in the Arabian Sea , 1984 .

[25]  G. Brooke Farquhar,et al.  Proceedings of an International Symposium on Biological Sound Scattering in the Ocean. Held at Airlie House Conference Center, Warrenton, Virginia on March 31-April 2, 1970, , 1970 .

[26]  J. Giske,et al.  Life-history parameters and vertical distribution of Maurolicus muelleri in Masfjorden in summer , 1994 .

[27]  S. Ohta,et al.  The use of underwater camera in studies of vertical distribution and swimming behaviour of a sergestid shrimp, Sergia lucens , 1981 .

[28]  Neil R. Andersen,et al.  Oceanic sound scattering prediction , 1977 .