Facial Attractiveness: Visual Impact of Symmetry Increases Significantly Towards the Midline

Symmetry is thought to be a major prerequisite for an attractive face. Many faces are not symmetric, yet are still regarded as beautiful. What role, then, does asymmetry play in the perception of beauty? We studied the assessment of computer-manipulated images by independent judges (n = 200–250): part A: nevi located at different positions; part B: standardized changes of the orbital region. The results showed that slight lateral orbital and facial asymmetry does not impair attractiveness at all and that asymmetries close to the midline are significantly less attractive than those affecting the lateral aspect of the face (P < 0.001). A single nevus which is located laterally on the face is significantly more attractive than a nevus close to the midline (P < 0.001). Faces with a completely symmetric bilateral pair of nevi in the same lateral positions (perceived as attractive when alone), received the worst ratings (P < 0.001). Symmetry is a characteristic of the attractive face, but there are exceptions to the rule. Under certain conditions symmetry can be completely unattractive. The visual impact of symmetry on the perception of beauty increases significantly when approaching the midline.

[1]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[2]  R. Johnstone Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.

[3]  D. Zaidel,et al.  THE FACE, BEAUTY, AND SYMMETRY: PERCEIVING ASYMMETRY IN BEAUTIFUL FACES , 2005, The International journal of neuroscience.

[4]  F.A.C.S. Henry A. Mentz III M.D,et al.  Facelift: Measurement of Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System Advancement With and Without Zygomaticus Major Muscle Release , 2005, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[5]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[6]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[7]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Xiancheng Wang,et al.  Free Anterolateral Thigh Adipofascial Flap for Hemifacial Atrophy , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  A. Hauschild,et al.  The sebaceous nevus as part of the Schimmelpenning–Feuerstein–Mims Syndrome – an obvious phacomatosis first documented in 1927 , 2003, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[10]  J. Britto,et al.  Remodelling the upper eyelid in the management of orbitopalpebral neurofibromatosis. , 2005, British journal of plastic surgery.

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[12]  M. Weissman,et al.  Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. , 1996, JAMA.

[13]  Linda Jeffery,et al.  Are Average and Symmetric Faces Attractive to Infants? Discrimination and Looking Preferences , 2002, Perception.

[14]  Stefan Wolfart,et al.  Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.

[15]  R. Morris,et al.  The mathematical basis of sexual attraction. , 2002, Medical hypotheses.

[16]  L A Whitaker,et al.  Evaluation of facial skeletal aesthetics and surgical planning. , 1991, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[17]  Keith Grochow,et al.  Dance reveals symmetry especially in young men , 2005, Nature.

[18]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  O. Ramirez,et al.  The beautiful eye. , 2005, Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America.

[21]  W. Shaw,et al.  The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[22]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches , 1994, Nature.

[23]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[25]  D. Sarwer,et al.  Physical appearance and cosmetic medical treatments: physiological and socio‐cultural influences , 2003, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[26]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Periorbital Reconstruction with Adjacent‐Tissue Skin Grafts , 2005, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[27]  V. Lucas Psychological Aspects of Reconstructive and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: Clinical, Empirical, and Ethical Perspectives , 2006 .

[28]  M. Kern,et al.  Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor angulation. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[29]  D. Soutar,et al.  A Comparison of Temporalis Transfer and Free Latissimus Dorsi Transfer in Lower Facial Reanimation Following Unilateral Longstanding Facial Palsy , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[30]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  M. Cheng,et al.  Strategies for a successful corrective Asian blepharoplasty after previously failed revisions. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[32]  C. Patronella,et al.  Facelift: Measurement of Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System Advancement With and Without Zygomaticus Major Muscle Release , 2005, Aesthetic plastic surgery.

[33]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[35]  A. Little,et al.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.