Protection Motivation Theory and Adolescents' Perceptions of Exercise1

Coping strategies endorsed by adolescents in dealing with a potential threat to their health were assessed in a study which investigated components of protection motivation theory. Year 9 and 10 high school students were presented with information about cardiovascular disease risk and the role of exercise in maintaining cardiorespiratory fitness. Three components specified by the theory were manipulated: response efficacy (effectiveness of exercise in preventing cardiovascular disease), response costs (costs associated with taking up a regular program of exercise) and self-efficacy (belief in ability to carry out a program of exercise) in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design with two levels (high vs. low) of each variable. It was hypothesized that such information would affect participants' perceptions of response efficacy, response costs, self-efficacy, and their selection of coping strategies. Six dependent variables were investigated: two adaptive coping strategies (behavioral intention to exercise, rational problem solving) and four maladaptive strategies (avoidance, wishful thinking, hopelessness, arid fatalism). Manipulation checks found significant differences between the high and low conditions of each independent variable. Adaptive strategies were strongly endorsed, whereas endorsement of the maladaptive strategies ranged from minimal to complete disagreement. Participants in the high self-efficacy condition indicated stronger intentions to exercise. Students in the low response efficacy condition demonstrated more endorsement of hopelessness and fatalism than did students in the high response efficacy condition. When exercising status was included as a fourth independent variable, it was found that active adolescents endorsed the adaptive coping strategies more strongly than did inactive adolescents. The cognitive coping strategies adopted by adolescents when dealing with perceived threats to their health may be influenced by information on the efficacy of relevant behavior, by perceptions of their ability to perform such behavior, and by their actual involvement with the behavior of concern.

[1]  A. Bauman,et al.  Recent trends and socio-demographic determinants of exercise participation in Australia. , 2010, Community health studies.

[2]  M. Hovell,et al.  Determinants of Exercise Behavior , 1990, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[3]  R S Paffenbarger,et al.  Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. , 1989, JAMA.

[4]  N. Owen,et al.  Development of Behaviorally-Based Policy Guidelines for the Promotion of Exercise , 1989, Journal of public health policy.

[5]  M. Adeyanju,et al.  The relationship among attitudes, behaviors, and biomedical measures of adolescents "at risk" for cardiovascular disease. , 1987, The Journal of school health.

[6]  C. Caspersen,et al.  Physical activity and the incidence of coronary heart disease. , 1987, Annual review of public health.

[7]  S. K. Wurtele,et al.  Relative contributions of protection motivation theory components in predicting exercise intentions and behavior. , 1987, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[8]  Cal D. Stoltenberg,et al.  Self-efficacy expectancy, outcome expectancy, and outcome value: Relative effects on behavioral intentions. , 1986 .

[9]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Protection Motivation Theory and preventive health: beyond the Health Belief Model , 1986 .

[10]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Protection Motivation Theory: Prediction of Intentions to Engage in Anti‐Nuclear War Behaviors1 , 1986 .

[11]  J. E. Maddux,et al.  Developmental issues in child health psychology. , 1986, The American psychologist.

[12]  J. Sallis,et al.  The determinants of physical activity and exercise. , 1985, Public health reports.

[13]  D. Jacobs,et al.  A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity. , 1985, Public health reports.

[14]  Kenneth H. Beck,et al.  The effects of risk probability, outcome severity, efficacy of protection and access to protection on decision making: A further test of protection motivation theory , 1984 .

[15]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change , 1983 .

[16]  Ronald W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of threatening and reassuring components of fear appeals on physiological and verbal measures of emotion and attitudes , 1979 .

[17]  Rodger W. Griffeth,et al.  Effects of Fear-Arousing Components of Driver Education on Students' Safety Attitudes and Simulator Performance. , 1976 .

[18]  Ronald W. Rogers,et al.  Coping with the energy crisis: Effects of fear appeals upon attitudes toward energy consumption. , 1975 .

[19]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.