Behavioral speed contagion: Automatic modulation of movement timing by observation of body movements

To coordinate our actions with those of others, it is crucial to not only choose an appropriate category of action but also to execute it at an appropriate timing. It is widely documented that people tend to unconsciously mimic others' behavior. The present study show that people also tend to modify their movement timing according to others' movements even when the observed and the to-be-executed movements are unrelated. Observers viewed either point-light biological motion, scrambled biological motion, or solid object motion. The stimulus sequence was presented at three different (half, normal, and double) rates. After a 300-2400-ms blank period, the observers performed a simple choice reaction-time task that was unrelated to the presented stimulus sequence. The observation of the biological motion produced a negative correlation between reaction time and stimulus speed, whereas no such trend was observed with the scrambled or solid object motion. Furthermore, speed-dependent modulation occurred only when the task was imposed within approximately 1s after the offset of the biological motion. These results suggest that behavioral tempo may be contagious; the speed of others' movements may automatically influence the timing of movement execution by the observer.

[1]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  P Bertelson,et al.  The Time Course of Preparation* , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[7]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  Primary motor cortex activation during action observation revealed by wavelet analysis of the EEG , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  The Social Nature of Perception and Action , 2006 .

[10]  R. Hari,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of sensorimotor neuromagnetic rhythms related to thumb movement , 1994, Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[12]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[16]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[17]  L. Craighero,et al.  Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[19]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[20]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor , 2005, Vision Research.

[22]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Q. Vuong,et al.  Incidental Processing of Biological Motion , 2004, Current Biology.

[25]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Human Cortical Electroencephalography (EEG) Rhythms during the Observation of Simple Aimless Movements: A High-Resolution EEG Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  C. Heyes,et al.  Experience modulates automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  M. Giese,et al.  Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception , 2006, Current Biology.

[29]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  U. Castiello Understanding other people's actions: intention and attention. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[39]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  K. Verfaillie Perceiving Human Locomotion: Priming Effects in Direction Discrimination , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  M. Goodale,et al.  An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.