Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia

Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is built by a communitya community of Wikipedians who are expected to "assume good faith" when interacting with one another. In Good Faith Collaboration, Joseph Reagle examines this unique collaborative culture. Wikipedia, says Reagle, is not the first effort to create a freely shared, universal encyclopedia; its early twentieth-century ancestors include Paul Otlet's Universal Repository and H. G. Wells's proposal for a World Brain. Both these projects, like Wikipedia, were fuelled by new technologywhich at the time included index cards and microfilm. What distinguishes Wikipedia from these and other more recent ventures is Wikipedia's good-faith collaborative culture, as seen not only in the writing and editing of articles but also in their discussion pages and edit histories. Keeping an open perspective on both knowledge claims and other contributors, Reagle argues, creates an extraordinary collaborative potential. Wikipedia is famously an encyclopedia "anyone can edit," and Reagle examines Wikipedia's openness and several challenges to it: technical features that limit vandalism to articles; private actions to mitigate potential legal problems; and Wikipedia's own internal bureaucratization. He explores Wikipedia's process of consensus (reviewing a dispute over naming articles on television shows) and examines the way leadership and authority work in an open-content community. Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been imitated, analyzed, and satirized. Despite the social unease over its implications for individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the character (and quality) of cultural products, Wikipedia's good-faith collaborative culture has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the century-old pursuit of a universal encyclopedia.

[1]  J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[2]  Derek Lackaff,et al.  An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  M. Kingwell A civil tongue : justice, dialogue, and the politics of pluralism , 1995 .

[4]  N. Carr Is Google Making Us Stupid? , 2008, The Best Technology Writing 2009.

[5]  Mark Fischetti,et al.  Weaving the web - the original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor , 1999 .

[6]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[7]  Nelson,et al.  Literary machines : the report on, and of, project Xanadu concerning word processing, electronic publishing, hypertext, thinkertoys, tomorrow's intellectual revolution, and certain other topics including knowledge, education and freedom , 1981 .

[8]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Wikipedia risks , 2005, CACM.

[9]  Henry Jenkins Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture , 1992 .

[10]  Richard M. Stallman The free universal encyclopedia and learning resource , 2000 .

[11]  Clay Shirkey Newspapers and thinking the unthinkable : digital developments , 2009 .

[12]  G. Bragues,et al.  Wiki-Philosophizing in a Marketplace of Ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia's Entries on Seven Great Minds , 2007 .

[13]  Herb Brody Great expectations: why predictions go awry , 1993 .

[14]  E. Torres-Guerra [We are in the web]. , 2012, Investigacion clinica.

[15]  Foster Stockwell A History of Information Storage and Retrieval , 2000 .

[16]  William Wells,et al.  We are the web , 2000, Genome Biology.

[17]  Brewster Kahle Universal Access to All Knowledge , 2007 .

[18]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[19]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia , 2007, CHI.

[20]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 1989 .

[21]  Gary Wolf The Curse of Xanadu , 2009 .

[22]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[23]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .