Fitting multichannel-compression hearing aids.

Multichannel hearing aids have been introduced recently in clinical practice. In this paper, some advantages and disadvantages of multichannel hearing aids are discussed. The advantages include an improved use of compression. However, the number of settings will be larger in multichannel hearing aids and exact knowledge of the goal to be pursued by compression is more necessary than ever. Inexactness of the definitions of these goals may have been a reason for the contradictory results in the studies on multichannel compression. A number of requirements must be fulfilled for a successful application of multichannel compression. One of these is detailed knowledge about the perception of suprathreshold signals. For that reason, an extension of the battery of tests commonly used in rehabilitative audiology is necessary. Another requirement is that the fitting strategy is determined by the purpose of applying compression. The objectives will be different for compression limiting and syllabic compression. A fitting procedure used in clinical practice has to take into account some limitations in the fitting time available. A number of possible fitting tools are discussed. Two strongly different fitting strategies for the same commercially available three-channel compression aid illustrate fundamental differences in fitting philosophy.

[1]  E Villchur Multichannel compression processing for profound deafness. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  I V Nábĕlek Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[4]  L D Braida,et al.  Principal-component amplitude compression for the hearing impaired. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D Byrne,et al.  The effects of multichannel compression/expansion amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. , 1988, British journal of audiology.

[7]  C M Reed,et al.  Hearing aids--a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. , 1979, ASHA monographs.

[8]  Edgar Villchur Comments on ‘‘The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation‐transfer function’’ [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 2322–2327 (1988)] , 1989 .

[9]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B C Moore,et al.  Design and evaluation of a two-channel compression hearing aid. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  E W Yund,et al.  Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Amplitude compression and profound hearing loss. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  J Kiessling,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a programmable three-channel automatic gain control amplification system. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  B E Walden,et al.  Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking? , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  B C Moore,et al.  Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. , 1991, British journal of audiology.

[16]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[17]  Braida Ld,et al.  Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987 .

[18]  F K Kuk,et al.  Consonant recognition and quality judgments of noise-reduction hearing aids. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[19]  A A Montgomery,et al.  Evaluation of two speech enhancement techniques to improve intelligibility for hearing-impaired adults. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  R. Lippmann,et al.  Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  The temporal resolution factor with and without background noise. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[22]  B C Moore How much do we gain by gain control in hearing aids? , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.